Government & Public Sector · head to head
Axon Records vs PublicInput

Axon Records
Government & Public Sector
Digital Evidence and Records Management
- From
- $1500/month
- Rated
- -

PublicInput
Government & Public Sector
Inclusive Community Engagement
- From
- $400/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Axon Records pricing is not published and is arranged per agency; PublicInput all three plans, Listen, Engage and Engage Plus, are listed as Request Pricing with no published rate, minimum or cost driver
- They diverge on capability: Axon Records covers Records Management, PublicInput covers Virtual Public Meetings.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Axon Records and PublicInput actually diverge.
| Attribute | Axon Records | PublicInput |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $1500/month | $400/month |
| Founded | 1993 | 2014 |
Identical on both: pricing model (subscription), free tier (No), platforms (Web, Ios, Android), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Government & Public Sector).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Axon Records
- Records Management
- Digital Evidence
- Body Camera Integration
- Automated Redaction
- Case Management
- Evidence.com
- CAD Systems
- Court Systems
Only in PublicInput
- Virtual Public Meetings
- Online Surveys
- Comment Management
- Multi-language Support
- Engagement Analytics
- Zoom
- Microsoft Teams
- GovDelivery
Both cover
- Web support
- Ios support
- Android support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Axon Records
- Police records management and incident reportingnot PublicInput
- AI-assisted report drafting from body camera footagenot PublicInput
- Linking evidence to case recordsnot PublicInput
- Working alongside an existing CAD systemnot PublicInput
PublicInput
- Running public comment and community engagement programmes for local governmentnot Axon Records
- Collecting resident feedback across surveys, interactive maps and project websitesnot Axon Records
- Compliant public meeting management for transit agencies, DOTs and MPOsnot Axon Records
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Axon Records
- Pricing is not published and is arranged per agency
- Most valuable alongside Axon Evidence, so it draws an agency further into one vendor's ecosystem
- Sold only to law enforcement, so it is not a general records system
PublicInput
- All three plans, Listen, Engage and Engage Plus, are listed as Request Pricing with no published rate, minimum or cost driver
- HTML and CSS customization, custom workflows and approvals, and external system integration with Accela and ESRI are listed as Enterprise Capabilities rather than core platform features
- Public meetings functionality is sold under a separate Meetings plan rather than being included with the Engagement plans
- Getting a plan requires booking a consultation and a tailored demo rather than self serve signup
Pricing, plan by plan
Axon Records
$1500/month- Records & Evidence$1500/month
- RMS
- Evidence.com
- Workflows
PublicInput
$400/month- Enterprise$400/month
- Virtual Meetings
- Surveys
- Comment Management
Which should you pick?
Choose Axon Records if
- You need records management.
- You work on Web, Ios, Android.
- You also want digital evidence.
Choose PublicInput if
- You need virtual public meetings.
- You work on Web, Ios, Android.
- You also want online surveys.
Questions people ask
- Is Axon Records or PublicInput better?
- Neither clearly leads. Axon Records starts at $1500/month and PublicInput at $400/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Axon Records or PublicInput?
- Axon Records starts at $1500/month and PublicInput at $400/month.
- Does Axon Records or PublicInput run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, Ios, Android, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- What is Axon Records best used for?
- Axon Records is most often used for police records management and incident reporting, ai-assisted report drafting from body camera footage, linking evidence to case records, working alongside an existing cad system. Of those, police records management and incident reporting and ai-assisted report drafting from body camera footage are not what PublicInput is typically brought in for.
- What can Axon Records do that PublicInput cannot?
- Axon Records covers Records Management, Digital Evidence, Body Camera Integration, Automated Redaction. PublicInput covers Virtual Public Meetings, Online Surveys, Comment Management, Multi-language Support. Both handle Web support, Ios support, Android support.
Related pages
More on Axon Records
More on PublicInput
Other head to heads
- Axon Records vs Accela
- Axon Records vs CivicPlus
- Axon Records vs Granicus
- Axon Records vs DocuWare
- Axon Records vs Laserfiche
- Axon Records vs Legistar
- Axon Records vs OnBase
- Axon Records vs CentralSquare
- Axon Records vs CityView
- Axon Records vs eCode360
- Axon Records vs Socrata
- Axon Records vs Tyler Technologies
- Axon Records vs American Legal Publishing
- Axon Records vs AWS GovCloud
- Axon Records vs Azure Government
- Axon Records vs Bang the Table
- Axon Records vs Citizen
- PublicInput vs Accela
- PublicInput vs CivicPlus
- PublicInput vs Granicus
- PublicInput vs DocuWare
- PublicInput vs Laserfiche
- PublicInput vs Legistar
- PublicInput vs OnBase
- PublicInput vs CentralSquare
- PublicInput vs CityView
- PublicInput vs eCode360
- PublicInput vs Socrata
- PublicInput vs Tyler Technologies
- PublicInput vs American Legal Publishing
- PublicInput vs AWS GovCloud
- PublicInput vs Azure Government
- PublicInput vs Bang the Table
- PublicInput vs Citizen
