APIs · head to head
Asyncapi vs Basis Theory

Basis Theory
APIs
Developer tokenisation platform that holds card and sensitive data inside a PCI Level 1 environment you do not operate
- From
- $995/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Asyncapi has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Asyncapi complex to implement and debug asynchronous operations due to their non-linear and concurrent nature; Basis Theory the Starter plan is 995 US dollars a month before any volume, which is a real floor for an early stage company and puts the product out of reach of teams tokenising a few thousand records.
- They diverge on capability: Asyncapi covers API Specification, Basis Theory covers Tokenisation API.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Asyncapi and Basis Theory actually diverge.
| Attribute | Asyncapi | Basis Theory |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | $995/month |
| Pricing model | open-source | Per month by token volume |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Web, CLI, IDE Extensions | Web, iOS, Android, Linux |
| Founded | 2019 | Unknown |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (APIs).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Asyncapi
- API Specification
- Code generation
- Documentation
- Multiple messaging protocols
- Code generators
- Specification support
- Tools support
- CLI support
Only in Basis Theory
- Tokenisation API
- Hosted elements
- Outbound proxy
- PCI attestation of compliance
- Processor portability
- Reactors
- Access controls and audit
- PII and PHI options
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Asyncapi
- API Developmentnot Basis Theory
- API Gatewaynot Basis Theory
- API Testingnot Basis Theory
- API Documentationnot Basis Theory
- Microservicesnot Basis Theory
Basis Theory
- A payments company that wants card on file without bringing its own infrastructure into PCI scope and paying for the assessment that followsnot Asyncapi
- A merchant locked into a processor by that processor vault that wants to hold its own tokens and route to more than one acquirernot Asyncapi
- A fintech collecting bank account and identity data that needs it isolated from its application database before an enterprise security reviewnot Asyncapi
- A team that needs to send stored card data to a third party for a one-off integration without that data traversing its own serversnot Asyncapi
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Asyncapi
- Complex to implement and debug asynchronous operations due to their non-linear and concurrent nature
- Keeping AsyncAPI documents up to date is challenging as systems evolve
- Tracing and debugging asynchronous operations is more difficult than synchronous request-response patterns
Basis Theory
- The Starter plan is 995 US dollars a month before any volume, which is a real floor for an early stage company and puts the product out of reach of teams tokenising a few thousand records.
- Starter is limited to the US region, so a company with European data residency requirements is pushed into a quoted Scale or Enterprise agreement immediately.
- Log retention on Starter is 24 hours, which is well below what most security teams expect for a system holding cardholder data and forces an upgrade for reasons unrelated to volume.
- Migrating away means moving card data out of the vault, which requires processor and assessor involvement and is slow, so the portability argument that attracts buyers cuts against them at exit.
- An attestation of compliance covers the vendor environment, not your assessment; your assessor still decides what is in scope, and buyers occasionally discover their integration pattern pulled systems back into scope anyway.
Pricing, plan by plan
Asyncapi
Free- Open SourceFree
- AsyncAPI specification
- Tools
- Community support
Basis Theory
$995/month- Starter$995/month
- 20,000 tokens included
- Production PCI Level 1 environment
- US region only
- Scale$undefined/month
- Quoted
- Higher token volumes
- Additional regions
- Enterprise$undefined/month
- Quoted
- Additional compliance options for PII and PHI
- Responses for 95 percent of PCI SAQ D
Which should you pick?
Choose Asyncapi if
- You need api specification.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, CLI, IDE Extensions.
- You also want code generation.
Choose Basis Theory if
- You need tokenisation api.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, Linux.
- You also want hosted elements.
Questions people ask
- Is Asyncapi or Basis Theory better?
- Neither clearly leads. Asyncapi starts at Free and Basis Theory at $995/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Asyncapi or Basis Theory?
- Asyncapi has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Asyncapi and $995/month for Basis Theory.
- Does Asyncapi or Basis Theory run on more platforms?
- Asyncapi runs on Web, CLI, IDE Extensions. Basis Theory runs on Web, iOS, Android, Linux.
- Can I use Asyncapi for free?
- Yes. Asyncapi has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Basis Theory starts at $995/month.
- What is Asyncapi best used for?
- Asyncapi is most often used for api development, api gateway, api testing, api documentation. Of those, api development and api gateway are not what Basis Theory is typically brought in for.
- What can Asyncapi do that Basis Theory cannot?
- Asyncapi covers API Specification, Code generation, Documentation, Multiple messaging protocols. Basis Theory covers Tokenisation API, Hosted elements, Outbound proxy, PCI attestation of compliance.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Asyncapi: What is AsyncAPI used for?
AsyncAPI is an open-source specification for defining and documenting asynchronous APIs, message-driven systems, and event-driven architectures. It serves the same purpose for async APIs as OpenAPI does for REST APIs, providing standardized documentation, code generation, and tooling.
SourceBasis Theory: Does this make us PCI compliant?
It removes cardholder data from your systems and gives you an AOC plus documented responses for most of a SAQ D. Your assessor still determines your scope, and a careless integration can pull systems back in.
Asyncapi: Is AsyncAPI free to use?
Yes, AsyncAPI is completely free and open-source. It is hosted by the Linux Foundation and supported by community contributions and sponsorships from companies like Postman, IBM, IQVIA Technology, and Solace.
SourceBasis Theory: What does it cost to start?
995 US dollars a month on Starter, including 20,000 tokens, a production PCI Level 1 environment and US hosting. Higher tiers are quoted.
Asyncapi: What protocols and technologies does AsyncAPI support?
AsyncAPI supports multiple protocols and technologies including Kafka, RabbitMQ, MQTT, Socket.IO, AWS EventBridge, and others. It provides language support for JavaScript/TypeScript, Python, Java, Go, C#/.NET, Kotlin, and PHP.
SourceBasis Theory: Can we switch payment processors without re-collecting cards?
Yes, that is the main non-compliance reason to buy it. You hold the tokens and detokenise into whichever processor you route to.
Asyncapi: Does AsyncAPI have IDE support?
Yes, AsyncAPI has IDE extensions available for VSCode and IntelliJ, along with CLI utilities and GitHub Actions integration for developers.
SourceBasis Theory: Is data stored outside the United States?
Not on Starter, which is US only. Other regions require a Scale or Enterprise agreement.
Related pages
More on Basis Theory
Other head to heads
- Asyncapi vs Hasura
- Asyncapi vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Asyncapi vs Gravitee
- Asyncapi vs PocketBase
- Asyncapi vs Janus Gateway
- Asyncapi vs Directus
- Asyncapi vs Appwrite
- Asyncapi vs Bruno
- Asyncapi vs Kong Gateway
- Asyncapi vs Convoy
- Asyncapi vs Parse Server
- Asyncapi vs MuleSoft Anypoint
- Asyncapi vs Neonomics
- Asyncapi vs Payload CMS
- Asyncapi vs Portkey
- Asyncapi vs Prisma
- Asyncapi vs RapidAPI
- Asyncapi vs Kong
- Asyncapi vs Skyflow
- Asyncapi vs Increase
- Asyncapi vs Lithic
- Asyncapi vs Volt
- Asyncapi vs Swan
- Asyncapi vs Moov
- Asyncapi vs Trustly
- Asyncapi vs Vodeno
- Asyncapi vs TrueLayer
- Asyncapi vs Paymentology
- Asyncapi vs Akoya
- Asyncapi vs Sila
- Asyncapi vs Backbase
- Asyncapi vs Enfuce
- Asyncapi vs Griffin
- Asyncapi vs Stoplight
- Basis Theory vs Hasura
- Basis Theory vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Basis Theory vs Gravitee
- Basis Theory vs PocketBase
- Basis Theory vs Janus Gateway
- Basis Theory vs Directus
- Basis Theory vs Appwrite
- Basis Theory vs Bruno
- Basis Theory vs Kong Gateway
- Basis Theory vs Convoy
- Basis Theory vs Parse Server
- Basis Theory vs MuleSoft Anypoint
- Basis Theory vs Neonomics
- Basis Theory vs Payload CMS
- Basis Theory vs Portkey
- Basis Theory vs Prisma
- Basis Theory vs RapidAPI
- Basis Theory vs Kong
- Basis Theory vs Skyflow
- Basis Theory vs Increase
- Basis Theory vs Lithic
- Basis Theory vs Volt
- Basis Theory vs Swan
- Basis Theory vs Moov
- Basis Theory vs Trustly
- Basis Theory vs Vodeno
- Basis Theory vs TrueLayer
- Basis Theory vs Paymentology
- Basis Theory vs Akoya
- Basis Theory vs Sila
- Basis Theory vs Backbase
- Basis Theory vs Enfuce
- Basis Theory vs Griffin
- Basis Theory vs Stoplight

