Software · head to head
Asyncapi vs Kong Gateway
Asyncapi
Software
Specification and tools for defining asynchronous APIs
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
Kong Gateway
Software
Open-source and cloud API gateway for managing microservices traffic
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Asyncapi complex to implement and debug asynchronous operations due to their non-linear and concurrent nature; Kong Gateway the free open-source gateway lacks the analytics, portals, and support of the paid Konnect tiers.
- They diverge on capability: Asyncapi covers API Specification, Kong Gateway covers API request routing.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Asyncapi and Kong Gateway actually diverge.
| Attribute | Asyncapi | Kong Gateway |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | open-source | freemium |
| Platforms | Web, CLI, IDE Extensions | web, linux, api |
| Founded | 2019 | 2017 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Asyncapi
- API Specification
- Code generation
- Documentation
- Multiple messaging protocols
- Code generators
- Specification support
- Tools support
- CLI support
Only in Kong Gateway
- API request routing
- Plugin ecosystem
- Developer portals
- AI Gateway
- Analytics and observability
- SSO and audit logs
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Asyncapi
- API Developmentnot Kong Gateway
- API Gatewaynot Kong Gateway
- API Testingnot Kong Gateway
- API Documentationnot Kong Gateway
- Microservicesnot Kong Gateway
Kong Gateway
- Routing and securing traffic across microservicesnot Asyncapi
- Publishing internal or external developer portalsnot Asyncapi
- Managing rate limits and authentication at the API edgenot Asyncapi
- Gateway-level routing to multiple LLM providersnot Asyncapi
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Asyncapi
- Complex to implement and debug asynchronous operations due to their non-linear and concurrent nature
- Keeping AsyncAPI documents up to date is challenging as systems evolve
- Tracing and debugging asynchronous operations is more difficult than synchronous request-response patterns
Kong Gateway
- The free open-source gateway lacks the analytics, portals, and support of the paid Konnect tiers.
- Plus tier caps API requests at 1M/month before incurring per-million overage charges.
- Enterprise pricing is custom and not published, making budgeting harder without sales contact.
- Configuration and plugin management can require significant operational expertise to run at scale.
Pricing, plan by plan
Asyncapi
Free- Open SourceFree
- AsyncAPI specification
- Tools
- Community support
Kong Gateway
Free- Free TrialFree
- 30-day enterprise functionality trial
- Unlimited gateways
- 30-day analytics retention
- Plus$undefined/month
- Up to 5 serverless, 2 hybrid, 2 dedicated cloud gateways
- 1M API requests/month included
- Up to 2 developer portals
- Enterprise$undefined/month
- Unlimited hybrid and dedicated cloud gateways
- Unlimited developer portals
- SSO and audit logs
Which should you pick?
Choose Asyncapi if
- You need api specification.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, CLI, IDE Extensions.
- You also want code generation.
Choose Kong Gateway if
- You need api request routing.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on web, linux, api.
- You also want plugin ecosystem.
Questions people ask
- Is Asyncapi or Kong Gateway better?
- Neither clearly leads. Asyncapi starts at Free and Kong Gateway at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Asyncapi or Kong Gateway?
- Asyncapi starts at Free and Kong Gateway at Free.
- Does Asyncapi or Kong Gateway run on more platforms?
- Asyncapi runs on Web, CLI, IDE Extensions. Kong Gateway runs on web, linux, api.
- Can I use Asyncapi for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Asyncapi best used for?
- Asyncapi is most often used for api development, api gateway, api testing, api documentation. Of those, api development and api gateway are not what Kong Gateway is typically brought in for.
- What can Asyncapi do that Kong Gateway cannot?
- Asyncapi covers API Specification, Code generation, Documentation, Multiple messaging protocols. Kong Gateway covers API request routing, Plugin ecosystem, Developer portals, AI Gateway.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Asyncapi: What is AsyncAPI used for?
AsyncAPI is an open-source specification for defining and documenting asynchronous APIs, message-driven systems, and event-driven architectures. It serves the same purpose for async APIs as OpenAPI does for REST APIs, providing standardized documentation, code generation, and tooling.
SourceKong Gateway: Is Kong Gateway free?
Kong's core gateway is open source and free to self-host. Kong Konnect, the managed cloud platform, offers a 30-day free trial before moving to paid Plus or custom Enterprise pricing.
SourceAsyncapi: Is AsyncAPI free to use?
Yes, AsyncAPI is completely free and open-source. It is hosted by the Linux Foundation and supported by community contributions and sponsorships from companies like Postman, IBM, IQVIA Technology, and Solace.
SourceKong Gateway: How is usage metered on the Plus plan?
The Plus plan includes 1M API requests per month, with additional usage billed at $200 per extra 1 million requests up to a 10M/month cap, plus per-gateway and per-LLM-model charges.
SourceAsyncapi: What protocols and technologies does AsyncAPI support?
AsyncAPI supports multiple protocols and technologies including Kafka, RabbitMQ, MQTT, Socket.IO, AWS EventBridge, and others. It provides language support for JavaScript/TypeScript, Python, Java, Go, C#/.NET, Kotlin, and PHP.
SourceKong Gateway: What support is included?
Plus includes email support with a 2-business-day SLA, while Enterprise adds dedicated success managers and professional services.
SourceAsyncapi: Does AsyncAPI have IDE support?
Yes, AsyncAPI has IDE extensions available for VSCode and IntelliJ, along with CLI utilities and GitHub Actions integration for developers.
SourceRelated pages
More on Kong Gateway
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Asyncapi vs Appwrite
- Asyncapi vs Hasura
- Asyncapi vs PocketBase
- Asyncapi vs Sanity
- Asyncapi vs Apigee
- Asyncapi vs Ably
- Asyncapi vs Pusher
- Asyncapi vs PubNub
- Asyncapi vs Treblle
- Asyncapi vs Apollo GraphQL
- Asyncapi vs Bruno
- Asyncapi vs KeystoneJS
- Asyncapi vs Moesif
- Asyncapi vs Parse Server
- Asyncapi vs Stainless
- Asyncapi vs Stoplight
- Asyncapi vs Strapi
- Asyncapi vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Kong Gateway vs Appwrite
- Kong Gateway vs Hasura
- Kong Gateway vs PocketBase
- Kong Gateway vs Sanity
- Kong Gateway vs Apigee
- Kong Gateway vs Ably
- Kong Gateway vs Pusher
- Kong Gateway vs PubNub
- Kong Gateway vs Treblle
- Kong Gateway vs Apollo GraphQL
- Kong Gateway vs Bruno
- Kong Gateway vs KeystoneJS
- Kong Gateway vs Moesif
- Kong Gateway vs Parse Server
- Kong Gateway vs Stainless
- Kong Gateway vs Stoplight
- Kong Gateway vs Strapi
- Kong Gateway vs Swagger/OpenAPI