Customer Support · head to head
Assembled vs Scratchpad

Assembled
Customer Support
Workforce management and AI agents for support teams that run on Zendesk, Salesforce or Intercom
- From
- $25/month
- Free plan
- No

Scratchpad
CRM
Faster workspace over Salesforce for sales reps to update pipeline, take notes and manage deals
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Only Scratchpad has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Assembled the published per-agent rate is not the whole bill, because a separate platform fee sits on top and is not published, so the headline 25 USD figure understates the real cost and you still need a quote to know the total.; Scratchpad scratchpad works with Salesforce and nothing else, with no HubSpot support, so it is off the shortlist entirely for any company on a different CRM regardless of how good the interface is.
- They diverge on capability: Assembled covers Volume forecasting, Scratchpad covers Spreadsheet pipeline views.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Assembled and Scratchpad actually diverge.
| Attribute | Assembled | Scratchpad |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $25/month | Free |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Web, API | Web, Chrome extension |
| Category | Customer Support | CRM |
Identical on both: pricing model (Per user per month), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Assembled
- Volume forecasting
- Schedule generation
- Real-time adherence
- Agent self-service
- Intraday reporting
- AI Copilot
- AI Agents
- BPO management
Only in Scratchpad
- Spreadsheet pipeline views
- Call recorder and notetaker
- AI field updates
- Deal and account agent
- Hygiene monitor
- Notes linked to records
- Custom prompts
- Kanban and forecast views
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Assembled
- A 200-agent software support team that has outgrown spreadsheet rostering and wants forecast-driven schedules tied to Zendesk ticket historynot Scratchpad
- A support operations lead who needs to model in-house agents and two BPO vendors in a single capacity plan before the next peak seasonnot Scratchpad
- A subscription business that wants to measure whether an AI deflection layer actually reduces required headcount, using the same forecasting tool that sizes the human teamnot Scratchpad
- A finance team that needs a defensible per-agent cost line for support tooling before a board budget review, without a three-week vendor quoting cyclenot Scratchpad
Scratchpad
- A 60-rep Salesforce team whose forecast is unreliable because opportunity fields are updated once a week in a panic before the pipeline callnot Assembled
- A rep who wants to update twenty opportunities in a grid rather than opening twenty Salesforce recordsnot Assembled
- A sales manager wanting stale and incomplete pipeline records flagged automatically instead of chased by emailnot Assembled
- A revenue operations lead trialling AI notetaking that writes back to CRM fields before committing budget, using the free tiernot Assembled
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Assembled
- The published per-agent rate is not the whole bill, because a separate platform fee sits on top and is not published, so the headline 25 USD figure understates the real cost and you still need a quote to know the total.
- Pricing AI Agents per resolved conversation while pricing workforce management per seat means the two products pull in opposite directions financially: successful deflection shrinks the seat count you are billed for and grows the consumption charge, making year-two budgeting unpredictable.
- Long-range capacity planning and what-if scenario modelling are thinner than in NICE or Verint, so organisations doing annual headcount planning across multiple sites often end up exporting to a spreadsheet anyway.
- There is no quality management or agent evaluation module, so a support organisation that wants WFM and QA from one vendor has to buy a second tool and reconcile two sets of agent records.
- The product assumes a modern ticketing system as the source of truth; teams running a legacy ACD or a homegrown queue face custom integration work that the standard connectors do not cover, and forecast accuracy suffers until that data is clean.
- There is no native mobile application, so agents check schedules, request time off and swap shifts through a mobile browser, which is a persistent friction point for hourly and contact centre workforces who do not sit at a desk.
Scratchpad
- Scratchpad works with Salesforce and nothing else, with no HubSpot support, so it is off the shortlist entirely for any company on a different CRM regardless of how good the interface is.
- AI credits are metered per user per month at 400 on Solo and 800 on Team, which means heavy notetaking use pushes teams towards Enterprise for capacity rather than for features.
- There is no proper native mobile application, so representatives who wanted to update records from a car park between meetings are back in a mobile browser.
- Sync with Salesforce and call processing can lag, and a pipeline view showing yesterday state during a forecast call undermines the exact meeting the tool was bought to improve.
- It creates a second notes surface alongside native Salesforce notes, so organisations end up with deal history split across two places unless they explicitly ban one of them.
Pricing, plan by plan
Assembled
$25/month- Core$25/month
- Forecasting
- Scheduling
- Real-time adherence
- Pro$45/month
- Everything in Core
- Advanced forecasting models
- BPO and vendor management
- Enterprise$75/month
- Everything in Pro
- SSO and SCIM
- Advanced security review
- AI Copilot$35/month
- Reply drafting
- Knowledge retrieval
- Agent workspace embed
Scratchpad
Free- FreeFree
- Workspace limited to 3 views
- 10 hours a month of call recording and notetaking
- AI field updates
- Solo$19/month
- Unlimited views with sheets and notes
- Call recorder and notetaker
- AI field updates
- Team$49/month
- Everything in Solo
- 800 AI credits per user per month
- Gong integration
- Enterprise$undefined/month
- Unlimited AI credits
- White-glove agent services included
- Enterprise security and administration
Which should you pick?
Choose Assembled if
- You need volume forecasting.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want schedule generation.
Choose Scratchpad if
- You need spreadsheet pipeline views.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Chrome extension.
- You also want call recorder and notetaker.
Questions people ask
- Is Assembled or Scratchpad better?
- Neither clearly leads. Assembled starts at $25/month and Scratchpad at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Assembled or Scratchpad?
- Scratchpad has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $25/month for Assembled and Free for Scratchpad.
- Does Assembled or Scratchpad run on more platforms?
- Assembled runs on Web, API. Scratchpad runs on Web, Chrome extension.
- Can I use Scratchpad for free?
- Yes. Scratchpad has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Assembled starts at $25/month.
- What is Assembled best used for?
- Assembled is most often used for a 200-agent software support team that has outgrown spreadsheet rostering and wants forecast-driven schedules tied to zendesk ticket history, a support operations lead who needs to model in-house agents and two bpo vendors in a single capacity plan before the next peak season, a subscription business that wants to measure whether an ai deflection layer actually reduces required headcount, using the same forecasting tool that sizes the human team, a finance team that needs a defensible per-agent cost line for support tooling before a board budget review, without a three-week vendor quoting cycle. Of those, a 200-agent software support team that has outgrown spreadsheet rostering and wants forecast-driven schedules tied to zendesk ticket history and a support operations lead who needs to model in-house agents and two bpo vendors in a single capacity plan before the next peak season are not what Scratchpad is typically brought in for.
- What can Assembled do that Scratchpad cannot?
- Assembled covers Volume forecasting, Schedule generation, Real-time adherence, Agent self-service. Scratchpad covers Spreadsheet pipeline views, Call recorder and notetaker, AI field updates, Deal and account agent.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Assembled: Does Assembled publish its real total cost?
It publishes per-agent tier rates of 25, 45 and 75 USD per month but adds an unpublished platform fee, so budget for the seat rate plus a fixed annual platform charge that you must ask for.
Scratchpad: Does Scratchpad work with HubSpot?
No. It is Salesforce-only.
Assembled: Can I buy the AI agents without buying workforce management?
Yes. Assembled sells WFM, AI Copilot and AI Agents as separately purchasable products, and AI Agents are billed at 0.65 USD per resolved conversation rather than per seat.
Scratchpad: Is the free plan usable in production?
Yes for an individual: full workspace with three views, 10 hours of recording and 100 AI credits a month. Teams outgrow it on views and credits.
Assembled: Is it suitable for a voice-first call centre?
Less so. The forecasting and scheduling are built around omnichannel ticketing volume, and voice-heavy operations running a legacy ACD will find the integration and intraday voice controls weaker than a traditional WFM suite.
Scratchpad: Does it replace Salesforce licences?
No. Every user still needs their own Salesforce licence; Scratchpad is an interface on top.
Assembled: How long does implementation take?
Assembled states typically one month or less, which is realistic when your helpdesk is Zendesk or Salesforce and historical data is clean.
Scratchpad: What are AI credits spent on?
Notetaking, summarisation, field update suggestions and agent queries. Enterprise removes the cap.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Assembled vs Zendesk
- Assembled vs Calabrio ONE
- Assembled vs Cresta
- Assembled vs Kapture CX
- Assembled vs HelpCrunch
- Assembled vs Document360
- Assembled vs Helpjuice
- Assembled vs Balto
- Assembled vs Forethought
- Assembled vs Dialpad Contact Center
- Assembled vs Level AI
- Assembled vs UJET
- Assembled vs BMC Helix
- Assembled vs Chatwoot
- Assembled vs Customerly
- Assembled vs Clari
- Assembled vs Gong
- Assembled vs Salesforce
- Assembled vs HubSpot
- Assembled vs Folk
- Assembled vs Streak
- Assembled vs Pipedrive
- Assembled vs Seismic
- Assembled vs Freshsales
- Assembled vs Agile CRM
- Assembled vs Capsule
- Assembled vs Capsule CRM
- Assembled vs Nimble
- Assembled vs OnePageCRM
- Assembled vs Ontraport
- Assembled vs Really Simple Systems
- Assembled vs Salesflare
- Assembled vs Seamless.AI
- Scratchpad vs Zendesk
- Scratchpad vs Calabrio ONE
- Scratchpad vs Cresta
- Scratchpad vs Kapture CX
- Scratchpad vs HelpCrunch
- Scratchpad vs Document360
- Scratchpad vs Helpjuice
- Scratchpad vs Balto
- Scratchpad vs Forethought
- Scratchpad vs Dialpad Contact Center
- Scratchpad vs Level AI
- Scratchpad vs UJET
- Scratchpad vs BMC Helix
- Scratchpad vs Chatwoot
- Scratchpad vs Customerly
- Scratchpad vs Clari
- Scratchpad vs Gong
- Scratchpad vs Salesforce
- Scratchpad vs HubSpot
- Scratchpad vs Folk
- Scratchpad vs Streak
- Scratchpad vs Pipedrive
- Scratchpad vs Seismic
- Scratchpad vs Freshsales
- Scratchpad vs Agile CRM
- Scratchpad vs Capsule
- Scratchpad vs Capsule CRM
- Scratchpad vs Nimble
- Scratchpad vs OnePageCRM
- Scratchpad vs Ontraport
- Scratchpad vs Really Simple Systems
- Scratchpad vs Salesflare
- Scratchpad vs Seamless.AI
