Cybersecurity · head to head
Arnica vs iubenda

Arnica
Cybersecurity
AI-native application security platform detecting and fixing vulnerabilities across the SDLC
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

iubenda
Legal
Published-price privacy compliance: certified consent banner, privacy policy and cookie policy from under 60 euros a year
- From
- €59.88/year
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Arnica has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Arnica per-identity pricing ($25-$50/person/year) requires tracking active developers; iubenda plans are metered by monthly pageviews, so a single viral article can push a site two tiers up mid-year and the cost is driven by traffic rather than by revenue.
- They diverge on capability: Arnica covers AI SAST, iubenda covers Privacy and cookie policy generator.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Arnica and iubenda actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Arnica
- AI SAST
- Software Composition Analysis
- Secrets detection
- IaC scanning
- Container scanning
- SBOM generation
- Agentic rules
- Pipelineless integration
Only in iubenda
- Privacy and cookie policy generator
- Google-certified CMP
- IAB TCF 2.2
- Consent solution for forms
- Register of processing activities
- Terms and conditions generator
- Accessibility widget
- Multi-language
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Arnica
- Detecting AI-generated vulnerabilities in Copilot and Cursor suggestionsnot iubenda
- Finding hardcoded secrets before they reach productionnot iubenda
- Mapping container vulnerabilities back to source codenot iubenda
- Generating SBOM for supply chain compliance requirementsnot iubenda
- Scanning infrastructure-as-code for misconfiguration risksnot iubenda
iubenda
- A small European publisher that needs Google-certified consent to keep serving Google demand but cannot pay enterprise CMP pricesnot Arnica
- An agency maintaining privacy policies across dozens of client sites that must stay current as services changenot Arnica
- A SaaS company selling into the EU that needs a defensible cookie banner and processing register without hiring a privacy lawyernot Arnica
- An e-commerce store adding third-party marketing tools that keeps having to update its cookie disclosurenot Arnica
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Arnica
- Per-identity pricing ($25-$50/person/year) requires tracking active developers
- Overage identity tracking via 90-day PR activity can be unpredictable
- Free plan limited to weekly updates, requiring upgrade for real-time scanning
- Advanced add-ons (Image Scanning, AI SAST, Agentic Rules Enforcer) pricing not published
- On-premises deployment limited to Enterprise tier
iubenda
- Plans are metered by monthly pageviews, so a single viral article can push a site two tiers up mid-year and the cost is driven by traffic rather than by revenue.
- Generated policies are templates from a clause library, so unusual data processing, complex international transfers or sector-specific rules are not covered and still need a lawyer.
- It addresses the public-facing compliance surface only, with no data discovery, vendor risk assessment or data subject request automation, so a growing company will need a second platform.
- The accessibility product is delivered through a partner and priced separately, and overlay widgets of that kind are contested as an accessibility solution, so buying it does not remove legal exposure.
- Support is largely documentation and ticket based at the lower tiers, which is a poor match for an urgent regulatory query where the answer is needed the same day.
Pricing, plan by plan
Arnica
Free- FreeFree
- No credit card required
- 14-day trial available
- Weekly risk identification updates
- Core Business$360/year
- Monthly billing option at $30/identity/month
- Annual billing at $25/identity/month (17% discount)
- Real-time risk scanning and notifications
- Core Enterprise$720/year
- Monthly billing option at $60/identity/month
- Annual billing at $50/identity/month (17% discount)
- All Core Business features
iubenda
€59.88/year- Essentials$59.88/year
- Up to 25,000 pageviews per month
- Privacy and cookie policy
- Google-certified CMP with Consent Mode
- Advanced$239.88/year
- Up to 50,000 pageviews per month
- Everything in Essentials
- Additional consent and preference features
- Ultimate$959.88/year
- Up to 150,000 pageviews per month
- Everything in Advanced
- Higher volume consent recording
- Accessibility Standard$600/year
- Accessibility widget for 150,000 pageviews per month
- Delivered with a partner
- Separate from the compliance plans
Which should you pick?
Choose Arnica if
- You need ai sast.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, GitHub, IDE.
- You also want software composition analysis.
Choose iubenda if
- You need privacy and cookie policy generator.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, API.
- You also want google-certified cmp.
Questions people ask
- Is Arnica or iubenda better?
- Neither clearly leads. Arnica starts at Free and iubenda at €59.88/year, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Arnica or iubenda?
- Arnica has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Arnica and €59.88/year for iubenda.
- Does Arnica or iubenda run on more platforms?
- Arnica runs on Web, GitHub, IDE. iubenda runs on Web, iOS, Android, API.
- Can I use Arnica for free?
- Yes. Arnica has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. iubenda starts at €59.88/year.
- What is Arnica best used for?
- Arnica is most often used for detecting ai-generated vulnerabilities in copilot and cursor suggestions, finding hardcoded secrets before they reach production, mapping container vulnerabilities back to source code, generating sbom for supply chain compliance requirements. Of those, detecting ai-generated vulnerabilities in copilot and cursor suggestions and finding hardcoded secrets before they reach production are not what iubenda is typically brought in for.
- What can Arnica do that iubenda cannot?
- Arnica covers AI SAST, Software Composition Analysis, Secrets detection, IaC scanning. iubenda covers Privacy and cookie policy generator, Google-certified CMP, IAB TCF 2.2, Consent solution for forms.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Arnica: How are identities defined in Arnica pricing?
Identities are any users and other contributing entities that contributed code and/or had PR activity during the last 90 days. This ensures billing matches active developers.
Sourceiubenda: Is iubenda a certified consent platform?
Yes. It is an IAB-validated CMP supporting TCF 2.2 and a Google-certified CMP partner with Consent Mode built in.
Arnica: What is the annual discount?
Annual prepayment offers approximately 17% savings versus monthly billing. Core Business annual is $300/identity versus $360 for monthly.
Sourceiubenda: What does it cost?
Prices are published: 59.88 euros a year for up to 25,000 monthly pageviews, 239.88 for 50,000 and 959.88 for 150,000.
Arnica: Can I cancel or downgrade Arnica anytime?
Yes. Subscriptions can be cancelled or downgraded at any time. Overage identities receive automatic protection with true-up invoicing.
Sourceiubenda: Do the generated policies make me compliant?
They cover the disclosure obligations for common processing. Unusual processing, international transfers or sector rules still need legal advice.
iubenda: Does it handle data subject access requests?
Not in the way a dedicated privacy platform does. It is focused on policies, consent and processing records.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Arnica vs Semgrep
- Arnica vs Snyk
- Arnica vs Chainguard
- Arnica vs Tenable
- Arnica vs Doppler
- Arnica vs Aikido
- Arnica vs Endor Labs
- Arnica vs Trivy
- Arnica vs Socket
- Arnica vs Infisical
- Arnica vs Bitwarden
- Arnica vs RoboForm
- Arnica vs Sardine
- Arnica vs Semperis
- Arnica vs SentinelOne
- Arnica vs Shufti Pro
- Arnica vs Nessus
- Arnica vs SentinelOne Singularity
- Arnica vs Didomi
- Arnica vs Cookiebot
- Arnica vs Secure Privacy
- Arnica vs Clio
- Arnica vs Everlaw
- Arnica vs NetDocuments
- Arnica vs CosmoLex
- Arnica vs Harvey
- Arnica vs DISCO
- Arnica vs Filevine
- Arnica vs CASEpeer
- Arnica vs Lawmatics
- Arnica vs Westlaw
- Arnica vs Docketwise
- iubenda vs Semgrep
- iubenda vs Snyk
- iubenda vs Chainguard
- iubenda vs Tenable
- iubenda vs Doppler
- iubenda vs Aikido
- iubenda vs Endor Labs
- iubenda vs Trivy
- iubenda vs Socket
- iubenda vs Infisical
- iubenda vs Bitwarden
- iubenda vs RoboForm
- iubenda vs Sardine
- iubenda vs Semperis
- iubenda vs SentinelOne
- iubenda vs Shufti Pro
- iubenda vs Nessus
- iubenda vs SentinelOne Singularity
- iubenda vs Didomi
- iubenda vs Cookiebot
- iubenda vs Secure Privacy
- iubenda vs Clio
- iubenda vs Everlaw
- iubenda vs NetDocuments
- iubenda vs CosmoLex
- iubenda vs Harvey
- iubenda vs DISCO
- iubenda vs Filevine
- iubenda vs CASEpeer
- iubenda vs Lawmatics
- iubenda vs Westlaw
- iubenda vs Docketwise
