Music · head to head
Ardour vs Cubase

Ardour
Music
GPL workstation whose source is free and whose prebuilt binaries are paid
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Cubase
Music
Steinberg workstation with the strongest score editor of any DAW, now licensed without a USB dongle
- From
- $99.99/one-time
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Ardour has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Ardour almost no instruments or sample content ship with it, so a working music production setup needs third-party plugins that in practice cost more than a commercial workstation licence would have.; Cubase steinberg Licensing ties activations to an account across up to three machines, so an isolated or air-gapped studio computer needs the offline activation procedure rather than a carried dongle, and that procedure must be repeated whenever the hardware is rebuilt.
- They diverge on capability: Ardour covers Unlimited tracks and buses, Cubase covers Score editor.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Ardour and Cubase actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Music).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Ardour
- Unlimited tracks and buses
- VCA masters
- Video timeline
- Lua scripting
- JACK and native audio backends
- No activation or phone home
- Broad plugin support
- Source availability
Only in Cubase
- Score editor
- Expression maps
- VariAudio
- Chord Track and Chord Pads
- Logical Editor
- Video track
- Steinberg Licensing
- MixConsole
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Ardour
- Linux studios and broadcast facilities where the commercial workstations do not run at allnot Cubase
- Institutions deploying a workstation across many machines without per-seat licences, by compiling and distributing their own buildnot Cubase
- Post-production and dubbing against a video reference, with Lua scripts automating repetitive editsnot Cubase
- Archival work where a session must open in ten years with no activation server involvednot Cubase
Cubase
- Writing to picture where the deliverable includes printed parts as well as a mix, because the score comes from the same project rather than a MIDI exportnot Ardour
- Driving large orchestral sample libraries, where expression maps turn articulation switching into notation instead of hidden keyswitch lanesnot Ardour
- Studios standardised on Steinberg or Yamaha hardware, where control surface integration is already builtnot Ardour
- Replacing a dongle based Cubase installation, where the reason to upgrade is removing the USB key as a single point of failurenot Ardour
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Ardour
- Almost no instruments or sample content ship with it, so a working music production setup needs third-party plugins that in practice cost more than a commercial workstation licence would have.
- ARA is not supported, so Melodyne and similar pitch tools run as offline transfers, and the MIDI editor is behind Cubase, Live and Logic for anything past basic sequencing.
- Support is community forums and a mailing list; there is no vendor with a response commitment, so a facility needing contractual support has to employ that expertise itself.
- Plugin behaviour on Linux is fragmented across LV2, VST2 and VST3 with inconsistent GUI toolkit support, so a plugin working on one distribution is no evidence it will work on another.
- The interface is dense and assumes you already understand signal routing, and the documentation lags the current release, so the first hours are slower than with a commercial workstation.
Cubase
- Steinberg Licensing ties activations to an account across up to three machines, so an isolated or air-gapped studio computer needs the offline activation procedure rather than a carried dongle, and that procedure must be repeated whenever the hardware is rebuilt.
- Elements and Artist withhold features most buyers eventually need, including the top VariAudio tier and full surround work, so the realistic price is the Pro edition rather than the entry figure.
- Projects saved in a newer version cannot be opened in an older one, so studios collaborating with clients on mixed versions have to standardise, and paid upgrades arrive roughly once a year.
- There is no Linux build and no stated plan for one, so the platform choice is Windows or macOS only and a Linux studio is excluded outright.
- The interface carries three decades of accumulated windows and dialogs spread across the Project window, MixConsole, Key Editor and Score Editor, so the learning curve is considerably longer than Live or Logic for a new user.
Pricing, plan by plan
Ardour
Free- Source codeFree
- GPL licensed
- Compile it yourself at no cost
- Redistribution permitted, including internally
- Subscription$1/month
- Prebuilt installers for all three platforms
- All updates while the subscription runs
- Higher voluntary tiers available
- Single payment$45/one-time
- Prebuilt installer
- Updates until the next major version
- No recurring charge
Cubase
$99.99/one-time- Cubase Elements$99.99/one-time
- Perpetual licence
- Capped audio, MIDI and instrument track counts
- Reduced editing and mixing tool set
- Cubase Artist$329.99/one-time
- Perpetual licence
- Higher track limits than Elements
- Score editor included
- Cubase Pro$579.99/one-time
- Perpetual licence
- Unlimited tracks
- Full score editor, expression maps and surround
Which should you pick?
Choose Ardour if
- You need unlimited tracks and buses.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows.
- You also want vca masters.
Choose Cubase if
- You need score editor.
- You work on Windows, macOS.
- You also want expression maps.
Questions people ask
- Is Ardour or Cubase better?
- Neither clearly leads. Ardour starts at Free and Cubase at $99.99/one-time, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Ardour or Cubase?
- Ardour has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Ardour and $99.99/one-time for Cubase.
- Does Ardour or Cubase run on more platforms?
- Ardour runs on Linux, macOS, Windows. Cubase runs on Windows, macOS.
- Can I use Ardour for free?
- Yes. Ardour has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Cubase starts at $99.99/one-time.
- What is Ardour best used for?
- Ardour is most often used for linux studios and broadcast facilities where the commercial workstations do not run at all, institutions deploying a workstation across many machines without per-seat licences, by compiling and distributing their own build, post-production and dubbing against a video reference, with lua scripts automating repetitive edits, archival work where a session must open in ten years with no activation server involved. Of those, linux studios and broadcast facilities where the commercial workstations do not run at all and institutions deploying a workstation across many machines without per-seat licences, by compiling and distributing their own build are not what Cubase is typically brought in for.
- What can Ardour do that Cubase cannot?
- Ardour covers Unlimited tracks and buses, VCA masters, Video timeline, Lua scripting. Cubase covers Score editor, Expression maps, VariAudio, Chord Track and Chord Pads.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Ardour: Is Ardour free?
The source is free and GPL licensed. The prebuilt installers are paid, from a small monthly subscription or a single payment of at least 45 US dollars. You can compile it yourself at no cost and legally redistribute the result.
Cubase: Does Cubase still need a USB dongle?
No. From Cubase 12 onwards Steinberg Licensing replaced the eLicenser. Activation runs through the Steinberg Activation Manager on up to three computers.
Ardour: What does the single payment include?
A ready-to-run installer plus updates until the next major version. After that you pay again if you want the new major release as a prebuilt build.
Cubase: Can I run Cubase on a computer with no internet access?
Yes, but through the offline activation path in the Activation Manager rather than a normal sign in, and you repeat it if the machine is rebuilt. Test it before committing an isolated scoring rig.
Ardour: Can an organisation deploy it on many machines without paying per seat?
Yes. The GPL permits compiling and distributing your own build internally, so there is no per-seat cost. What you give up is the tested official installer and the funding you would otherwise contribute.
Cubase: Is Cubase a subscription?
No. Editions are bought outright and keep working. Steinberg charges separately for version upgrades, which appear roughly once a year.
Ardour: Is Linux the primary platform?
Yes. The macOS and Windows builds are real and supported, but Linux is where the project is developed and tested first.
Cubase: Which edition do I need for scoring work?
Pro. Artist includes a score editor, but Pro is the edition with the full engraving, expression map and surround feature set that media work assumes.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Ardour vs Audacity
- Ardour vs REAPER
- Ardour vs Logic Pro
- Ardour vs Studio One
- Ardour vs Pro Tools
- Ardour vs Bitwig Studio
- Ardour vs Renoise
- Ardour vs MuseScore
- Ardour vs BandLab
- Ardour vs Soundtrap
- Ardour vs rekordbox
- Ardour vs Serato DJ
- Ardour vs Traktor Pro
- Ardour vs Amazon Music
- Ardour vs GarageBand
- Ardour vs Sibelius
- Ardour vs Ableton Live
- Ardour vs Splice
- Ardour vs LANDR
- Ardour vs Shazam
- Cubase vs Audacity
- Cubase vs REAPER
- Cubase vs Logic Pro
- Cubase vs Studio One
- Cubase vs Pro Tools
- Cubase vs Bitwig Studio
- Cubase vs Renoise
- Cubase vs MuseScore
- Cubase vs BandLab
- Cubase vs Soundtrap
- Cubase vs rekordbox
- Cubase vs Serato DJ
- Cubase vs Traktor Pro
- Cubase vs Amazon Music
- Cubase vs GarageBand
- Cubase vs Sibelius
- Cubase vs Ableton Live
- Cubase vs Splice
- Cubase vs LANDR
- Cubase vs Shazam
