Databases · head to head
ArangoDB vs Neon

ArangoDB
Databases
Multi-model database for graph, document, and search
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: ArangoDB the company has repositioned around a wider platform, so ArangoDB is now described as the foundation inside Arango rather than the product itself; Neon compute pricing at $0.106-$0.222/CU-hour means costs scale directly with workload, unlike fixed-price alternatives
- They diverge on capability: ArangoDB covers Multi-model Support, Neon covers Serverless PostgreSQL.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which ArangoDB and Neon actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in ArangoDB
- Multi-model Support
- AQL Query Language
- Graph Traversals
- Full-text Search
- ACID Transactions
- SmartGraphs
- Satellite Collections
- Foxx Microservices
Only in Neon
- Serverless PostgreSQL
- Database Branching
- Autoscaling
- Bottomless Storage
- Point-in-time Recovery
- Connection Pooling
- Read Replicas
- Instant Cloning
Both cover
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
ArangoDB
- Graph, document and key-value data in one databasenot Neon
- Vector and full-text search alongside graph traversalnot Neon
- Avoiding separate stores for related and unstructured datanot Neon
- Backing AI applications needing both graph context and vectorsnot Neon
Neon
- Serverless applicationsnot ArangoDB
- Development databasesnot ArangoDB
- Preview environmentsnot ArangoDB
- Testingnot ArangoDB
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
ArangoDB
- The company has repositioned around a wider platform, so ArangoDB is now described as the foundation inside Arango rather than the product itself
- Neither the community licence terms nor cloud pricing are stated on the main site
- arangodb.com redirects to arango.ai
Neon
- Compute pricing at $0.106-$0.222/CU-hour means costs scale directly with workload, unlike fixed-price alternatives
- Separation of compute and storage may add complexity to cost prediction compared to all-in-one plans
Pricing, plan by plan
ArangoDB
Free- CommunityFree
- All data models
- AQL queries
- Full-text search
- ArangoGraph$99/month
- Managed service
- Graph analytics
- Enterprise support
Neon
Free- FreeFree
- 100 CU-hours/month
- 0.5 GB storage
- 1 project
- Launch$15/month
- Pay-as-you-go compute
- $0.35/GB storage
- Multiple projects
- Scale$31/month
- Higher compute rates
- 99.95% SLA
- HIPAA compliance
Which should you pick?
Choose ArangoDB if
- You need multi-model support.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, Mac, Docker, Web.
- You also want aql query language.
Choose Neon if
- You need serverless postgresql.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud.
- You also want database branching.
Questions people ask
- Is ArangoDB or Neon better?
- Neither clearly leads. ArangoDB starts at Free and Neon at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, ArangoDB or Neon?
- ArangoDB starts at Free and Neon at Free.
- Does ArangoDB or Neon run on more platforms?
- ArangoDB runs on Linux, Windows, Mac, Docker, Web. Neon runs on Cloud.
- Can I use ArangoDB for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is ArangoDB best used for?
- ArangoDB is most often used for graph, document and key-value data in one database, vector and full-text search alongside graph traversal, avoiding separate stores for related and unstructured data, backing ai applications needing both graph context and vectors. Of those, graph, document and key-value data in one database and vector and full-text search alongside graph traversal are not what Neon is typically brought in for.
- What can ArangoDB do that Neon cannot?
- ArangoDB covers Multi-model Support, AQL Query Language, Graph Traversals, Full-text Search. Neon covers Serverless PostgreSQL, Database Branching, Autoscaling, Bottomless Storage. Both handle Web support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
ArangoDB: How is ArangoDB priced?
ArangoDB offers Community Edition (free) and Enterprise Edition. Pricing is customized based on deployment model (self-managed, managed cloud AWS/GCP, or OEM/embedded) and customer requirements. Contact Arango for a quote.
SourceNeon: What is Neon and what makes it different?
Neon is a serverless PostgreSQL database that separates compute and storage, enabling automatic scaling and instant database branching. After acquisition by Databricks in May 2025, pricing has been significantly reduced.
SourceArangoDB: What deployment options does ArangoDB offer?
ArangoDB can be deployed self-managed on customer infrastructure, as managed cloud (Arango Managed Platform on AWS/GCP), or as OEM/embedded solutions.
SourceNeon: Does Neon offer a free tier?
Yes, Neon's free tier includes 100 compute units per month and 0.5 GB of storage. This is suitable for development and small projects.
SourceNeon: What are the paid plans and pricing for Neon?
Neon offers consumption-based pricing on Launch ($0.106/CU-hour, approximately $15/month) and Scale ($0.222/CU-hour, approximately $31/month) plans with separate storage billing at $0.35/GB-month. No monthly minimum required.
SourceNeon: What features does Neon provide?
Neon includes git-like branching for database copies, point-in-time recovery, data anonymization for testing, managed authentication, serverless functions, and object storage that branches with projects.
SourceNeon: What compliance and reliability guarantees does Neon provide?
Neon's Scale tier offers 99.95% uptime SLA, HIPAA compliance, SOC2 certification, and private networking via PrivateLink at no extra cost.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- ArangoDB vs Cockroach Labs
- ArangoDB vs Airtable
- ArangoDB vs PostgreSQL
- ArangoDB vs Amazon Aurora
- ArangoDB vs RavenDB
- ArangoDB vs CouchDB
- ArangoDB vs Neo4j
- ArangoDB vs Dgraph
- ArangoDB vs Couchbase
- ArangoDB vs CosmosDB
- ArangoDB vs Elasticsearch
- ArangoDB vs Firebolt
- ArangoDB vs Google Cloud SQL
- ArangoDB vs QuestDB
- ArangoDB vs Vitess
- ArangoDB vs Aiven
- ArangoDB vs DynamoDB
- ArangoDB vs Microsoft SQL Server
- ArangoDB vs Upstash
- ArangoDB vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- ArangoDB vs DigitalOcean
- ArangoDB vs Render
- ArangoDB vs Oracle Cloud
- ArangoDB vs Fly.io
- ArangoDB vs Railway
- ArangoDB vs Scaleway
- ArangoDB vs Proxmox VE
- ArangoDB vs Vultr
- ArangoDB vs Tencent Cloud
- ArangoDB vs Lambda
- ArangoDB vs Linode
- ArangoDB vs Longhorn
- ArangoDB vs Northflank
- ArangoDB vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- ArangoDB vs minikube
- ArangoDB vs OpenTelemetry
- Neon vs Cockroach Labs
- Neon vs Airtable
- Neon vs PostgreSQL
- Neon vs Amazon Aurora
- Neon vs RavenDB
- Neon vs CouchDB
- Neon vs Neo4j
- Neon vs Dgraph
- Neon vs Couchbase
- Neon vs CosmosDB
- Neon vs Elasticsearch
- Neon vs Firebolt
- Neon vs Google Cloud SQL
- Neon vs QuestDB
- Neon vs Vitess
- Neon vs Aiven
- Neon vs DynamoDB
- Neon vs Microsoft SQL Server
- Neon vs Upstash
- Neon vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Neon vs DigitalOcean
- Neon vs Render
- Neon vs Oracle Cloud
- Neon vs Fly.io
- Neon vs Railway
- Neon vs Scaleway
- Neon vs Proxmox VE
- Neon vs Vultr
- Neon vs Tencent Cloud
- Neon vs Lambda
- Neon vs Linode
- Neon vs Longhorn
- Neon vs Northflank
- Neon vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Neon vs minikube
- Neon vs OpenTelemetry

