APIs · head to head
Apollo GraphQL vs Thunder Client

Apollo GraphQL
APIs
GraphQL platform and API orchestration layer for building unified graphs
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Thunder Client
APIs
Lightweight REST API client built as VSCode extension
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Apollo GraphQL pricing beyond the Developer tier requires contacting sales, making cost comparison harder for mid-size teams.; Thunder Client paid plans are billed annually only: Starter is $3 per user per month and capped at a maximum of 10 seats, Business is $7 per user per month with 500 monthly collection runs per user, and Enterprise is $16 per user per month for unlimited runs
- They diverge on capability: Apollo GraphQL covers Apollo Connectors, Thunder Client covers REST Client.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Apollo GraphQL and Thunder Client actually diverge.
| Attribute | Apollo GraphQL | Thunder Client |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | web, api | VSCode extension, Web |
| Founded | Unknown | 2021 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (freemium), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (APIs).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Apollo GraphQL
- Apollo Connectors
- GraphOS Router
- Schema registry
- Schema checks
- Response caching
- Audit logging
Only in Thunder Client
- REST Client
- Environment variables
- Response testing
- VSCode
- GitHub
- Webhook support
- VSCode extension support
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Apollo GraphQL
- Federating multiple backend services into one GraphQL APInot Thunder Client
- Wrapping legacy REST APIs for frontend consumptionnot Thunder Client
- Enterprise API governance with schema checks and audit logsnot Thunder Client
- Reducing frontend over-fetching and under-fetching of datanot Thunder Client
Thunder Client
- API Developmentnot Apollo GraphQL
- API Gatewaynot Apollo GraphQL
- API Testingnot Apollo GraphQL
- API Documentationnot Apollo GraphQL
- Microservicesnot Apollo GraphQL
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Apollo GraphQL
- Pricing beyond the Developer tier requires contacting sales, making cost comparison harder for mid-size teams.
- Adopting GraphOS effectively requires buy-in to the GraphQL paradigm, which is a larger architectural shift than adding a REST gateway.
- The free plan's 1-day data retention and 60 req/min self-hosted router limit make it unsuitable for production use.
- Volume-based per-request pricing can become expensive at very high request volumes compared to flat-rate API gateways.
Thunder Client
- Paid plans are billed annually only: Starter is $3 per user per month and capped at a maximum of 10 seats, Business is $7 per user per month with 500 monthly collection runs per user, and Enterprise is $16 per user per month for unlimited runs
Pricing, plan by plan
Apollo GraphQL
Free- FreeFree
- Up to 3 developers
- 1-day data retention
- Community support
- Developer$5/month
- $5 per million requests with volume discounts
- $50 usage credit for new signups
- Up to 10 developers
- Standard$undefined/month
- Up to 30 developers
- 90-day data retention
- Standard support with SLA
- Enterprise$undefined/month
- Unlimited developers
- 18-month data retention
- 24x7x365 support with SLA
Thunder Client
Free- FreeFree
- REST client
- Collection management
- Local testing
- Pro$8/monthly
- Cloud sync
- Team collaboration
- Advanced features
Which should you pick?
Choose Apollo GraphQL if
- You need apollo connectors.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on web, api.
- You also want graphos router.
Choose Thunder Client if
- You need rest client.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on VSCode extension, Web.
- You also want environment variables.
Questions people ask
- Is Apollo GraphQL or Thunder Client better?
- Neither clearly leads. Apollo GraphQL starts at Free and Thunder Client at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Apollo GraphQL or Thunder Client?
- Apollo GraphQL starts at Free and Thunder Client at Free.
- Does Apollo GraphQL or Thunder Client run on more platforms?
- Apollo GraphQL runs on web, api. Thunder Client runs on VSCode extension, Web.
- Can I use Apollo GraphQL for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Apollo GraphQL best used for?
- Apollo GraphQL is most often used for federating multiple backend services into one graphql api, wrapping legacy rest apis for frontend consumption, enterprise api governance with schema checks and audit logs, reducing frontend over-fetching and under-fetching of data. Of those, federating multiple backend services into one graphql api and wrapping legacy rest apis for frontend consumption are not what Thunder Client is typically brought in for.
- What can Apollo GraphQL do that Thunder Client cannot?
- Apollo GraphQL covers Apollo Connectors, GraphOS Router, Schema registry, Schema checks. Thunder Client covers REST Client, Environment variables, Response testing, VSCode.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Apollo GraphQL: What does Apollo GraphQL cost?
The Free plan supports up to 3 developers at no cost. Developer plan starts at $5 per million requests with a $50 signup credit, while Standard and Enterprise require contacting sales for custom pricing.
SourceThunder Client: How much does Thunder Client cost?
Thunder Client publishes a free plan at no cost, then Starter at $3, Business at $7 and Enterprise at $16, all priced annually.
SourceApollo GraphQL: Is there a free plan and what are its limits?
Yes, the Free 'Forever Free' plan supports up to 3 developers, 1-day data retention for checks and insights, and a self-hosted router capped at 60 requests per minute.
SourceThunder Client: Is Thunder Client free?
Yes, there is a free plan. It is used through the Thunder Client extension for VS Code, available from the marketplace, with limits applied compared with the paid tiers.
SourceApollo GraphQL: How is usage metered on paid plans?
Standard requests are billed per million operations with tiered volume discounts, starting at $5.00/million for the first 250M and dropping to $3.00/million beyond 5B, with similar tiered pricing for subscription update events.
SourceRelated pages
More on Apollo GraphQL
More on Thunder Client
Other head to heads
- Apollo GraphQL vs Liveblocks
- Apollo GraphQL vs GraphQL Playground
- Apollo GraphQL vs Hasura
- Apollo GraphQL vs Pusher
- Apollo GraphQL vs Ozone API
- Apollo GraphQL vs WSO2 API Manager
- Apollo GraphQL vs Boomi API Management
- Apollo GraphQL vs MuleSoft Anypoint
- Apollo GraphQL vs Ably
- Apollo GraphQL vs Apigee
- Apollo GraphQL vs Lithic
- Apollo GraphQL vs Swan
- Apollo GraphQL vs Method Financial
- Apollo GraphQL vs Neonomics
- Apollo GraphQL vs Payload CMS
- Apollo GraphQL vs Portkey
- Apollo GraphQL vs Prisma
- Apollo GraphQL vs REST Client VSCode
- Apollo GraphQL vs PocketBase
- Apollo GraphQL vs Appwrite
- Apollo GraphQL vs Sanity
- Apollo GraphQL vs Bruno
- Apollo GraphQL vs Paw
- Apollo GraphQL vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Apollo GraphQL vs HTTPie
- Apollo GraphQL vs RapidAPI
- Apollo GraphQL vs 10x Banking
- Apollo GraphQL vs Brite Payments
- Apollo GraphQL vs Bud Financial
- Apollo GraphQL vs Episode Six
- Apollo GraphQL vs Kong Gateway
- Apollo GraphQL vs Swagger
- Thunder Client vs Liveblocks
- Thunder Client vs GraphQL Playground
- Thunder Client vs Hasura
- Thunder Client vs Pusher
- Thunder Client vs Ozone API
- Thunder Client vs WSO2 API Manager
- Thunder Client vs Boomi API Management
- Thunder Client vs MuleSoft Anypoint
- Thunder Client vs Ably
- Thunder Client vs Apigee
- Thunder Client vs Lithic
- Thunder Client vs Swan
- Thunder Client vs Method Financial
- Thunder Client vs Neonomics
- Thunder Client vs Payload CMS
- Thunder Client vs Portkey
- Thunder Client vs Prisma
- Thunder Client vs REST Client VSCode
- Thunder Client vs PocketBase
- Thunder Client vs Appwrite
- Thunder Client vs Sanity
- Thunder Client vs Bruno
- Thunder Client vs Paw
- Thunder Client vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Thunder Client vs HTTPie
- Thunder Client vs RapidAPI
- Thunder Client vs 10x Banking
- Thunder Client vs Brite Payments
- Thunder Client vs Bud Financial
- Thunder Client vs Episode Six
- Thunder Client vs Kong Gateway
- Thunder Client vs Swagger
