Software · head to head
Apollo GraphQL vs Backendless

Apollo GraphQL
Software
GraphQL platform and API orchestration layer for building unified graphs
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Backendless
Software
Visual app development platform with REST APIs and cloud backend
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Apollo GraphQL pricing beyond the Developer tier requires contacting sales, making cost comparison harder for mid-size teams.; Backendless free tier limited to 50 API requests per minute and 20 database tables
- They diverge on capability: Apollo GraphQL covers Apollo Connectors, Backendless covers REST API.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Apollo GraphQL and Backendless actually diverge.
| Attribute | Apollo GraphQL | Backendless |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | freemium | Unknown |
| Platforms | web, api | Cloud, Visual builder |
| Founded | Unknown | 2012 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Apollo GraphQL
- Apollo Connectors
- GraphOS Router
- Schema registry
- Schema checks
- Response caching
- Audit logging
Only in Backendless
- REST API
- Real-time database
- Cloud code
- Custom integrations
- Webhooks
- Cloud functions
- Cloud support
- Visual builder support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Apollo GraphQL
- Federating multiple backend services into one GraphQL APInot Backendless
- Wrapping legacy REST APIs for frontend consumptionnot Backendless
- Enterprise API governance with schema checks and audit logsnot Backendless
- Reducing frontend over-fetching and under-fetching of datanot Backendless
Backendless
- API Developmentnot Apollo GraphQL
- API Gatewaynot Apollo GraphQL
- API Testingnot Apollo GraphQL
- API Documentationnot Apollo GraphQL
- Microservicesnot Apollo GraphQL
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Apollo GraphQL
- Pricing beyond the Developer tier requires contacting sales, making cost comparison harder for mid-size teams.
- Adopting GraphOS effectively requires buy-in to the GraphQL paradigm, which is a larger architectural shift than adding a REST gateway.
- The free plan's 1-day data retention and 60 req/min self-hosted router limit make it unsuitable for production use.
- Volume-based per-request pricing can become expensive at very high request volumes compared to flat-rate API gateways.
Backendless
- Free tier limited to 50 API requests per minute and 20 database tables
- Smaller community and integration ecosystem compared to Firebase or AWS
- Customization beyond codeless tools requires developer expertise
- Limited documentation for advanced use cases and edge cases
Pricing, plan by plan
Apollo GraphQL
Free- FreeFree
- Up to 3 developers
- 1-day data retention
- Community support
- Developer$5/month
- $5 per million requests with volume discounts
- $50 usage credit for new signups
- Up to 10 developers
- Standard$undefined/month
- Up to 30 developers
- 90-day data retention
- Standard support with SLA
- Enterprise$undefined/month
- Unlimited developers
- 18-month data retention
- 24x7x365 support with SLA
Backendless
Free- FreeFree
- 50 API requests/minute
- 20 database tables
- 1 GB file storage
- Scale Variable$15/month
- Unlimited API requests/month
- 100 database tables
- 10 GB file storage
- Scale Fixed$15/month
- Same as Scale Variable
- Fixed monthly pricing
Which should you pick?
Choose Apollo GraphQL if
- You need apollo connectors.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on web, api.
- You also want graphos router.
Choose Backendless if
- You need rest api.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud, Visual builder.
- You also want real-time database.
Questions people ask
- Is Apollo GraphQL or Backendless better?
- Neither clearly leads. Apollo GraphQL starts at Free and Backendless at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Apollo GraphQL or Backendless?
- Apollo GraphQL starts at Free and Backendless at Free.
- Does Apollo GraphQL or Backendless run on more platforms?
- Apollo GraphQL runs on web, api. Backendless runs on Cloud, Visual builder.
- Can I use Apollo GraphQL for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Apollo GraphQL best used for?
- Apollo GraphQL is most often used for federating multiple backend services into one graphql api, wrapping legacy rest apis for frontend consumption, enterprise api governance with schema checks and audit logs, reducing frontend over-fetching and under-fetching of data. Of those, federating multiple backend services into one graphql api and wrapping legacy rest apis for frontend consumption are not what Backendless is typically brought in for.
- What can Apollo GraphQL do that Backendless cannot?
- Apollo GraphQL covers Apollo Connectors, GraphOS Router, Schema registry, Schema checks. Backendless covers REST API, Real-time database, Cloud code, Custom integrations.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Apollo GraphQL: What does Apollo GraphQL cost?
The Free plan supports up to 3 developers at no cost. Developer plan starts at $5 per million requests with a $50 signup credit, while Standard and Enterprise require contacting sales for custom pricing.
SourceBackendless: Does Backendless have a free tier?
Backendless Free plan ($0/month) includes 50 API requests per minute, 20 database tables, 1 GB file storage, 1 visualization, 2 security roles, and basic cloud code capabilities.
SourceApollo GraphQL: Is there a free plan and what are its limits?
Yes, the Free 'Forever Free' plan supports up to 3 developers, 1-day data retention for checks and insights, and a self-hosted router capped at 60 requests per minute.
SourceBackendless: What features does the Scale plan include?
Scale plan ($15+/month) provides unlimited API requests per month, 100 database tables, 10 GB file storage, 5 visualizations, 10 custom API keys, daily backups, free SSL certificates, and 1,000 real-time connections.
SourceApollo GraphQL: How is usage metered on paid plans?
Standard requests are billed per million operations with tiered volume discounts, starting at $5.00/million for the first 250M and dropping to $3.00/million beyond 5B, with similar tiered pricing for subscription update events.
SourceBackendless: Can I add more storage or increase API limits?
Yes, Backendless offers Function Packs ranging from $5-$399/month to increase specific limits such as storage, API requests, or security features.
SourceBackendless: Does Backendless support offline functionality?
Backendless supports real-time sync and offline capabilities for mobile apps, allowing data to sync when connectivity is restored.
SourceBackendless: Is Backendless Pro available for self-hosting?
Yes, Backendless Pro Community Edition is available under free licensing for core functionality. Managed Backendless is a paid option for self-hosted deployments with request-based pricing.
SourceBackendless: What are Backendless's integration limitations?
While Backendless supports many integrations, it has a smaller integration library compared to competitors. Finding solutions to edge cases or complex setups may require more development effort.
SourceRelated pages
More on Apollo GraphQL
More on Backendless
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Apollo GraphQL vs Appwrite
- Apollo GraphQL vs Hasura
- Apollo GraphQL vs PocketBase
- Apollo GraphQL vs Sanity
- Apollo GraphQL vs Apigee
- Apollo GraphQL vs Ably
- Apollo GraphQL vs Pusher
- Apollo GraphQL vs Kong Gateway
- Apollo GraphQL vs PubNub
- Apollo GraphQL vs Treblle
- Apollo GraphQL vs Bruno
- Apollo GraphQL vs KeystoneJS
- Apollo GraphQL vs Moesif
- Apollo GraphQL vs Parse Server
- Apollo GraphQL vs Stainless
- Apollo GraphQL vs Stoplight
- Apollo GraphQL vs Strapi
- Apollo GraphQL vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Backendless vs Appwrite
- Backendless vs Hasura
- Backendless vs PocketBase
- Backendless vs Sanity
- Backendless vs Apigee
- Backendless vs Ably
- Backendless vs Pusher
- Backendless vs Kong Gateway
- Backendless vs PubNub
- Backendless vs Treblle
- Backendless vs Bruno
- Backendless vs KeystoneJS
- Backendless vs Moesif
- Backendless vs Parse Server
- Backendless vs Stainless
- Backendless vs Stoplight
- Backendless vs Strapi
- Backendless vs Swagger/OpenAPI
