Database & Data Management · head to head
Amazon Redshift vs Apollo.io

Amazon Redshift
Database & Data Management
Fast, scalable cloud data warehouse from AWS
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Amazon Redshift on-demand pricing runs up to 75% higher than competitors like Snowflake and BigQuery; Apollo.io everything is metered in credits, and the free Starter plan runs on them too, so prospecting volume is capped rather than the feature set
- They diverge on capability: Amazon Redshift covers Columnar Storage, Apollo.io covers Contact database.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Amazon Redshift and Apollo.io actually diverge.
| Attribute | Amazon Redshift | Apollo.io |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | usage-based | subscription |
| Category | Database & Data Management | Unknown |
| Founded | 2012 | 2020 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), platforms (Web), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Amazon Redshift
- Columnar Storage
- Massively Parallel
- Machine Learning
- AQUA Acceleration
- Data Sharing
- Federated Query
- Concurrency Scaling
- S3
Only in Apollo.io
- Contact database
- Email finder
- Lead search
- Automation
- Engagement tracking
- Reporting
- Salesforce
- HubSpot
Both cover
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Amazon Redshift
- Business intelligencenot Apollo.io
- Data warehousingnot Apollo.io
- Real-time analyticsnot Apollo.io
- Reportingnot Apollo.io
- Machine learningnot Apollo.io
Apollo.io
- Lead generationnot Amazon Redshift
- Prospect researchnot Amazon Redshift
- Sales automationnot Amazon Redshift
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Amazon Redshift
- On-demand pricing runs up to 75% higher than competitors like Snowflake and BigQuery
- Requires significant manual tuning including managing concurrency scaling costs and configuring Workload Management queues
- Performance degrades without proper design of distribution keys and sort keys
- Limited elastic resize options - can only halve or double current cluster size
- AWS lock-in makes it unsuitable for multi-cloud architectures
Apollo.io
- Everything is metered in credits, and the free Starter plan runs on them too, so prospecting volume is capped rather than the feature set
- Plans described as unlimited are capped in the fair use policy at 10,000 credits a month for non-paying accounts
- Connecting a mailbox that is not Gmail or Microsoft requires a paid plan
- How many records can be selected at once varies by tier
- Running out of credits means buying more rather than waiting for a reset
Pricing, plan by plan
Amazon Redshift
Free- Free TrialFree
- 750 DC2.Large hours
- 2 months free
- Full features
- On-Demand$0.25/hour
- Pay per node hour
- All features
- Standard support
Apollo.io
Free- FreeFree
- Basic contact search
- Limited searches
- Starter$49/month
- Everything in Free
- Advanced search
- Email finder
- Professional$149/month
- Everything in Starter
- Automation
- Advanced analytics
Which should you pick?
Choose Amazon Redshift if
- You need columnar storage.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want massively parallel.
Choose Apollo.io if
- You need contact database.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want email finder.
Questions people ask
- Is Amazon Redshift or Apollo.io better?
- Neither clearly leads. Amazon Redshift starts at Free and Apollo.io at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Amazon Redshift or Apollo.io?
- Amazon Redshift starts at Free and Apollo.io at Free.
- Does Amazon Redshift or Apollo.io run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- Can I use Amazon Redshift for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Amazon Redshift best used for?
- Amazon Redshift is most often used for business intelligence, data warehousing, real-time analytics, reporting. Of those, business intelligence and data warehousing are not what Apollo.io is typically brought in for.
- What can Amazon Redshift do that Apollo.io cannot?
- Amazon Redshift covers Columnar Storage, Massively Parallel, Machine Learning, AQUA Acceleration. Apollo.io covers Contact database, Email finder, Lead search, Automation. Both handle Web support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Amazon Redshift: What deployment options does Amazon Redshift offer?
Redshift offers Provisioned Cluster (with RA3 or DC2 nodes) and Serverless options to match varying workloads. The new Redshift RG instance family, powered by Graviton, delivers 2.4x faster performance than RA3 at 30% lower cost per vCPU.
SourceAmazon Redshift: What does Amazon Redshift cost?
Provisioned cluster pricing: RA3 on-demand starts at $1.086/hour for ra3.xlplus. Serverless costs approximately $0.375 per RPU-hour with 4-RPU minimum (roughly $1.50/hour active workload). Managed storage costs $0.024/GB-month.
SourceAmazon Redshift: Does Redshift work with data lakes?
Yes, Redshift's integrated data lake query engine processes workloads on Apache Iceberg tables and other supported formats in Amazon S3, allowing you to run SQL analytics across your data warehouse and data lake from the same engine.
SourceAmazon Redshift: Is there a free tier for Amazon Redshift?
AWS offers a free trial with $300 USD in Serverless credits valid for 90 days, but Redshift is not part of the permanent AWS Free Tier.
SourceRelated pages
More on Amazon Redshift
Other head to heads
- Amazon Redshift vs Cockroach Labs
- Amazon Redshift vs PostgreSQL
- Amazon Redshift vs Airtable
- Amazon Redshift vs Amazon Aurora
- Amazon Redshift vs Elasticsearch
- Amazon Redshift vs PlanetScale
- Amazon Redshift vs Azure SQL
- Amazon Redshift vs ClickHouse
- Amazon Redshift vs Couchbase
- Amazon Redshift vs DuckDB
- Amazon Redshift vs DynamoDB
- Amazon Redshift vs MariaDB
- Amazon Redshift vs Oracle Database
- Amazon Redshift vs Amazon RDS
- Amazon Redshift vs Apache Druid
- Amazon Redshift vs Cassandra
- Amazon Redshift vs CouchDB
- Amazon Redshift vs Firebolt
- Amazon Redshift vs Outreach
- Amazon Redshift vs Gong
- Amazon Redshift vs Seismic
- Amazon Redshift vs Pipedrive
- Amazon Redshift vs HubSpot
- Amazon Redshift vs Salesforce
- Amazon Redshift vs Bitrix24
- Amazon Redshift vs Capsule
- Amazon Redshift vs Clari
- Amazon Redshift vs Freshsales
- Amazon Redshift vs Streak
- Amazon Redshift vs Zoho CRM
- Amazon Redshift vs Affinity
- Amazon Redshift vs Agile CRM
- Amazon Redshift vs Capsule CRM
- Amazon Redshift vs Clay
- Amazon Redshift vs Clearbit
- Amazon Redshift vs Cloze
- Apollo.io vs Cockroach Labs
- Apollo.io vs PostgreSQL
- Apollo.io vs Airtable
- Apollo.io vs Amazon Aurora
- Apollo.io vs Elasticsearch
- Apollo.io vs PlanetScale
- Apollo.io vs Azure SQL
- Apollo.io vs ClickHouse
- Apollo.io vs Couchbase
- Apollo.io vs DuckDB
- Apollo.io vs DynamoDB
- Apollo.io vs MariaDB
- Apollo.io vs Oracle Database
- Apollo.io vs Amazon RDS
- Apollo.io vs Apache Druid
- Apollo.io vs Cassandra
- Apollo.io vs CouchDB
- Apollo.io vs Firebolt
- Apollo.io vs Outreach
- Apollo.io vs Gong
- Apollo.io vs Seismic
- Apollo.io vs Pipedrive
- Apollo.io vs HubSpot
- Apollo.io vs Salesforce
- Apollo.io vs Bitrix24
- Apollo.io vs Capsule
- Apollo.io vs Clari
- Apollo.io vs Freshsales
- Apollo.io vs Streak
- Apollo.io vs Zoho CRM
- Apollo.io vs Affinity
- Apollo.io vs Agile CRM
- Apollo.io vs Capsule CRM
- Apollo.io vs Clay
- Apollo.io vs Clearbit
- Apollo.io vs Cloze

