Databases · head to head
Amazon RDS vs RisingWave

Amazon RDS
Databases
Set up, operate, and scale a relational database in the cloud
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

RisingWave
Databases
Streaming database that maintains incremental materialised views in SQL instead of Flink jobs
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Amazon RDS no super-user access or direct host connectivity limits advanced customization; RisingWave anything that does not fit SQL, such as custom windowing, complex event processing or heavy stateful logic, still needs Flink, so RisingWave often adds a system rather than removing one.
- They diverge on capability: Amazon RDS covers Multiple DB Engines, RisingWave covers SQL materialised views.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Amazon RDS and RisingWave actually diverge.
| Attribute | Amazon RDS | RisingWave |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | usage-based | Per RisingWave Unit hour |
| Platforms | AWS Cloud, Multi-AZ, Multi-region | Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud |
| Founded | 2006 | Unknown |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Databases).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Amazon RDS
- Multiple DB Engines
- Automated Backups
- Multi-AZ Deployment
- Read Replicas
- Encryption
- Performance Insights
- Automatic Scaling
- MySQL
Only in RisingWave
- SQL materialised views
- Postgres wire compatibility
- Object storage state
- Source connectors
- Sink connectors
- Iceberg tables
- Watermarks and windowing
- User defined functions
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Amazon RDS
- Transaction processingnot RisingWave
- Data storagenot RisingWave
- Application backendnot RisingWave
- Reportingnot RisingWave
- Data analyticsnot RisingWave
RisingWave
- A team with Kafka topics that needs continuously fresh aggregates for a dashboard without standing up a Flink clusternot Amazon RDS
- A fraud or risk team maintaining rolling counters and joins across event streams expressed as SQL viewsnot Amazon RDS
- A company doing Postgres CDC into a real-time denormalised view for search or servingnot Amazon RDS
- An analytics group that wants streaming results landed directly into Apache Iceberg without a separate writer jobnot Amazon RDS
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Amazon RDS
- No super-user access or direct host connectivity limits advanced customization
- Pricing unpredictable and expensive compared to GCP alternatives with equivalent features
- Limited access to system procedures and tables requiring advanced permissions
- No Oracle RAC (Real Application Clusters) support for high-availability Oracle deployments
RisingWave
- Anything that does not fit SQL, such as custom windowing, complex event processing or heavy stateful logic, still needs Flink, so RisingWave often adds a system rather than removing one.
- The Apache 2.0 community edition excludes premium features behind a licence key, and which capabilities sit on which side of that line moves between releases, so a self-hosted plan can be invalidated by an upgrade.
- Long-running materialised views accumulate state in object storage, and cost and recovery time grow with retention in ways that are hard to forecast before you are in production.
- The Postgres compatibility is protocol level; it is not a transactional Postgres and using it as a general purpose database, with point updates or high write concurrency, goes badly.
- It is a comparatively young venture-funded project competing with Flink, Materialize and warehouse-native streaming, and the ecosystem of connectors, operators and third-party expertise is much thinner.
Pricing, plan by plan
Amazon RDS
Free- On-Demand Instances$undefined/per second
- Reserved Instances$undefined/mo
- Database Savings Plans$undefined/mo
RisingWave
Free- Community EditionFree
- Apache 2.0 licence, self-hosted
- Core streaming engine and connectors
- Premium features excluded and require a licence key
- Cloud Basic$0.227/hour
- Billed per RisingWave Unit hour
- Hosted on AWS, GCP or Azure
- Capped at 64 cores
- Cloud Pro$undefined/year
- No core limit
- Bring your own cloud option
- Premium features included
- Self-managed Enterprise$undefined/year
- On premises or Kubernetes
- Premium features unlocked by licence
- Annual contract with SLA
Which should you pick?
Choose Amazon RDS if
- You need multiple db engines.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on AWS Cloud, Multi-AZ, Multi-region.
- You also want automated backups.
Choose RisingWave if
- You need sql materialised views.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud.
- You also want postgres wire compatibility.
Questions people ask
- Is Amazon RDS or RisingWave better?
- Neither clearly leads. Amazon RDS starts at Free and RisingWave at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Amazon RDS or RisingWave?
- Amazon RDS starts at Free and RisingWave at Free.
- Does Amazon RDS or RisingWave run on more platforms?
- Amazon RDS runs on AWS Cloud, Multi-AZ, Multi-region. RisingWave runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud.
- Can I use Amazon RDS for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Amazon RDS best used for?
- Amazon RDS is most often used for transaction processing, data storage, application backend, reporting. Of those, transaction processing and data storage are not what RisingWave is typically brought in for.
- What can Amazon RDS do that RisingWave cannot?
- Amazon RDS covers Multiple DB Engines, Automated Backups, Multi-AZ Deployment, Read Replicas. RisingWave covers SQL materialised views, Postgres wire compatibility, Object storage state, Source connectors.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Amazon RDS: What is included in the AWS Free Tier for RDS?
For signups before July 15, 2025: 750 hours per month of single-AZ database instance usage (12 months), 20 GB General Purpose SSD storage monthly, 20 GB automated backup storage monthly, available engines include MySQL, MariaDB, PostgreSQL, SQL Server Express Edition. For signups after July 15, 2025: choice between Free Plan or Paid Plan, $100 in credits plus up to $100 additional credits for activating foundational services, credits valid 12 months. Free Tier unavailable in AWS GovCloud (US) and China (Beijing) regions.
SourceRisingWave: Is RisingWave open source?
The community edition is Apache 2.0 and self-hostable, but a set of premium features requires a paid licence key.
Amazon RDS: How is data transfer priced in RDS?
Same Availability Zone (EC2 to RDS) is free. Multi-AZ replication is free. Cross-AZ within same region is 0.01 USD per GB in and out. Cross-region snapshots and backups follow standard data transfer charges.
SourceRisingWave: What does the cloud cost?
It starts at 0.227 US dollars per RisingWave Unit hour on the Basic tier, which is capped at 64 cores.
Amazon RDS: What database engines are supported by RDS?
Aurora, MySQL, PostgreSQL, MariaDB, Oracle, SQL Server, and IBM Db2. Pricing varies by engine.
SourceRisingWave: Does it replace Flink?
For SQL-expressible transformations, often yes. For custom stateful processing and complex event handling, no.
Amazon RDS: What cost components are included in RDS monthly pricing?
DB instance hours (billed in 1-second increments, 10-minute minimum), storage per GB per month, I/O requests (Aurora and magnetic storage only), provisioned IOPS per month, backup storage, and data transfer fees.
SourceRisingWave: Can I query it like Postgres?
Yes over the Postgres wire protocol, but it is an analytical streaming engine, not a transactional database.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Amazon RDS vs Google Cloud SQL
- Amazon RDS vs Azure SQL
- Amazon RDS vs Aiven
- Amazon RDS vs FaunaDB
- Amazon RDS vs Firebolt
- Amazon RDS vs DataStax
- Amazon RDS vs SingleStore
- Amazon RDS vs Nile
- Amazon RDS vs Zilliz
- Amazon RDS vs Cockroach Labs
- Amazon RDS vs ScyllaDB
- Amazon RDS vs Solace PubSub+
- Amazon RDS vs SQLite
- Amazon RDS vs StarRocks
- Amazon RDS vs SurrealDB
- Amazon RDS vs Teradata
- Amazon RDS vs BigQuery
- Amazon RDS vs CosmosDB
- Amazon RDS vs Apache Flink
- Amazon RDS vs Materialize
- Amazon RDS vs Tinybird
- Amazon RDS vs Redpanda
- Amazon RDS vs Timeplus
- Amazon RDS vs Estuary
- Amazon RDS vs Instaclustr
- Amazon RDS vs Fivetran HVR
- Amazon RDS vs TiDB
- Amazon RDS vs Xata
- Amazon RDS vs Amazon Aurora
- Amazon RDS vs TIBCO Enterprise Message Service
- Amazon RDS vs Apache Kafka
- RisingWave vs Google Cloud SQL
- RisingWave vs Azure SQL
- RisingWave vs Aiven
- RisingWave vs FaunaDB
- RisingWave vs Firebolt
- RisingWave vs DataStax
- RisingWave vs SingleStore
- RisingWave vs Nile
- RisingWave vs Zilliz
- RisingWave vs Cockroach Labs
- RisingWave vs ScyllaDB
- RisingWave vs Solace PubSub+
- RisingWave vs SQLite
- RisingWave vs StarRocks
- RisingWave vs SurrealDB
- RisingWave vs Teradata
- RisingWave vs BigQuery
- RisingWave vs CosmosDB
- RisingWave vs Apache Flink
- RisingWave vs Materialize
- RisingWave vs Tinybird
- RisingWave vs Redpanda
- RisingWave vs Timeplus
- RisingWave vs Estuary
- RisingWave vs Instaclustr
- RisingWave vs Fivetran HVR
- RisingWave vs TiDB
- RisingWave vs Xata
- RisingWave vs Amazon Aurora
- RisingWave vs TIBCO Enterprise Message Service
- RisingWave vs Apache Kafka
