Databases · head to head
Aiven vs Zabbix

Zabbix
Networking
Open source infrastructure and network monitoring with distributed proxies and templating
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Aiven the free plan gives 1 VM with 1 CPU, 1 GB RAM and 1 GB storage, and cannot pick a specific cloud or region; Zabbix the database is the scaling limit, and high frequency polling grows history tables fast enough that untuned installations hit housekeeping stalls and query timeouts within months.
- They diverge on capability: Aiven covers Multi-cloud Support, Zabbix covers Agent and agentless collection.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Aiven and Zabbix actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Aiven
- Multi-cloud Support
- Automated Backups
- Seamless Upgrades
- VPC Peering
- End-to-end Encryption
- Compliance
- Observability
- PostgreSQL
Only in Zabbix
- Agent and agentless collection
- Templates
- Low-level discovery
- Distributed proxies
- Trigger expressions
- Escalation actions
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Aiven
- Running managed open source databases without operating themnot Zabbix
- Multi-cloud deployment across AWS, Google Cloud, Azure, DigitalOcean, OVH and UpCloudnot Zabbix
- Highly available data services with automatic failovernot Zabbix
- Prototyping on a small free instance before scaling upnot Zabbix
Zabbix
- A service provider monitoring thousands of customer devices where per-device commercial licensing is the largest line itemnot Aiven
- Branch or industrial sites with unreliable links that need local collection and bufferingnot Aiven
- Mixed estates where the same tool must poll SNMP switches, Linux hosts, Windows servers and Java applicationsnot Aiven
- Replacing an aging Nagios installation while keeping script-based checks that already existnot Aiven
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Aiven
- The free plan gives 1 VM with 1 CPU, 1 GB RAM and 1 GB storage, and cannot pick a specific cloud or region
- Free and Developer tiers have no integrations and no connection pooling
- Connection pooling, database forks and dynamic disk sizing need the Business or Premium plan
- A 99.99 percent uptime SLA starts at the Startup plan from $75 a month
- High availability with automatic failover starts at Business from $180 a month
Zabbix
- The database is the scaling limit, and high frequency polling grows history tables fast enough that untuned installations hit housekeeping stalls and query timeouts within months.
- Initial configuration is heavy; getting useful alerting rather than noise requires understanding trigger expressions, macros and template inheritance, which is a multi-week learning curve for a team new to it.
- The AGPLv3 change at version 7.0 affects anyone offering Zabbix over a network as part of a commercial service, and that obligation is easy to inherit accidentally during an upgrade.
- The web interface is functional rather than pleasant, and many sites end up running Grafana alongside it purely for presentation, which is a second system to maintain.
- Upgrades between major versions touch the database schema and can take hours on large history tables, so the maintenance window is proportional to how much data you kept.
Pricing, plan by plan
Aiven
Free- Free TrialFree
- $300 credits
- 30 day trial
- All services
- Startup$19/month
- Single node
- Basic support
- Daily backups
Zabbix
Free- ZabbixFree
- No device, node or metric limits
- Full feature set with no paid edition of the software
- AGPLv3 from version 7.0 onward
- Zabbix Technical Support$undefined/year
- Tiered subscriptions with defined response times
- Access to Zabbix engineers for configuration and performance issues
- Bug fix priority and backports
Which should you pick?
Choose Aiven if
- You need multi-cloud support.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Aws, Azure, Gcp, Do.
- You also want automated backups.
Choose Zabbix if
- You need agent and agentless collection.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Web.
- You also want templates.
Questions people ask
- Is Aiven or Zabbix better?
- Neither clearly leads. Aiven starts at Free and Zabbix at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Aiven or Zabbix?
- Aiven starts at Free and Zabbix at Free.
- Does Aiven or Zabbix run on more platforms?
- Aiven runs on Web, Aws, Azure, Gcp, Do. Zabbix runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Web.
- Can I use Aiven for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Aiven best used for?
- Aiven is most often used for running managed open source databases without operating them, multi-cloud deployment across aws, google cloud, azure, digitalocean, ovh and upcloud, highly available data services with automatic failover, prototyping on a small free instance before scaling up. Of those, running managed open source databases without operating them and multi-cloud deployment across aws, google cloud, azure, digitalocean, ovh and upcloud are not what Zabbix is typically brought in for.
- What can Aiven do that Zabbix cannot?
- Aiven covers Multi-cloud Support, Automated Backups, Seamless Upgrades, VPC Peering. Zabbix covers Agent and agentless collection, Templates, Low-level discovery, Distributed proxies.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Aiven: What does Aiven's free tier include and does it have any time limit?
The free tier includes PostgreSQL with 1 VM, 1 CPU, 1 GB RAM, and 1 GB storage with access to limited cloud and region selections. There are no time limitations on the free tier, though Aiven reserves the right to shut down accounts that violate policies or remain unused for extended periods.
SourceZabbix: Is Zabbix genuinely free for commercial use?
The software has no licence fee at any scale. From version 7.0 it is AGPLv3, so offering it as a network service to third parties carries source distribution obligations.
Aiven: How is Aiven billed and what are the monthly costs for each tier?
Aiven bills services by the hour and invoices monthly, charging only for what you actually run. PostgreSQL pricing starts at 5 dollars per month for Developer, 12 dollars per month for Hobbyist, 75 dollars per month for Startup, 180 dollars per month for Business, and 270 dollars per month for Premium. All paid tiers offer hourly billing options as well.
SourceZabbix: What is the real cost of running it?
Database administration and the person who tunes it. Budget for PostgreSQL with TimescaleDB and someone who owns the retention policy.
Aiven: What backup retention periods are included at different Aiven tiers?
Backup retention increases with tier level: Startup tier provides 2 days of backup retention, Business tier offers 14 days, and Premium tier includes 30 days. Point-in-time restore is available on all paid tiers.
SourceZabbix: How does it compare to a commercial per-device tool?
It removes the licence line entirely and adds an operations line. Below a few hundred devices the commercial tool is often cheaper in total; above that Zabbix wins clearly.
Aiven: Is high availability included in Aiven pricing or charged separately?
High availability, backups, and routine maintenance are all included in the tier costs with no separate charges. The Business tier includes 2 VMs with automatic failover, and Premium includes 3 VMs with a second standby node.
SourceAiven: Does Aiven offer a trial period to test premium features?
Aiven offers a 30-day free trial to access premium features beyond what the free plan provides.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Aiven vs PostgreSQL
- Aiven vs Instaclustr
- Aiven vs Amazon Aurora
- Aiven vs Cockroach Labs
- Aiven vs Airtable
- Aiven vs Google Cloud SQL
- Aiven vs Apache Kafka
- Aiven vs RabbitMQ
- Aiven vs Azure SQL
- Aiven vs MariaDB
- Aiven vs LanceDB
- Aiven vs Marqo
- Aiven vs Nile
- Aiven vs Ninox
- Aiven vs Presto
- Aiven vs Privacera
- Aiven vs Amazon RDS
- Aiven vs Apache Flink
- Aiven vs Netdata
- Aiven vs OPNsense
- Aiven vs LibreNMS
- Aiven vs Icinga
- Aiven vs PRTG Network Monitor
- Aiven vs pfSense
- Aiven vs OpenVPN
- Aiven vs ThousandEyes
- Aiven vs Auvik
- Aiven vs Traefik
- Aiven vs Nebula
- Aiven vs Prometheus
- Aiven vs MikroTik RouterOS
- Aiven vs Ubiquiti UniFi
- Aiven vs Domotz
- Aiven vs Headscale
- Aiven vs HiveMQ
- Zabbix vs PostgreSQL
- Zabbix vs Instaclustr
- Zabbix vs Amazon Aurora
- Zabbix vs Cockroach Labs
- Zabbix vs Airtable
- Zabbix vs Google Cloud SQL
- Zabbix vs Apache Kafka
- Zabbix vs RabbitMQ
- Zabbix vs Azure SQL
- Zabbix vs MariaDB
- Zabbix vs LanceDB
- Zabbix vs Marqo
- Zabbix vs Nile
- Zabbix vs Ninox
- Zabbix vs Presto
- Zabbix vs Privacera
- Zabbix vs Amazon RDS
- Zabbix vs Apache Flink
- Zabbix vs Netdata
- Zabbix vs OPNsense
- Zabbix vs LibreNMS
- Zabbix vs Icinga
- Zabbix vs PRTG Network Monitor
- Zabbix vs pfSense
- Zabbix vs OpenVPN
- Zabbix vs ThousandEyes
- Zabbix vs Auvik
- Zabbix vs Traefik
- Zabbix vs Nebula
- Zabbix vs Prometheus
- Zabbix vs MikroTik RouterOS
- Zabbix vs Ubiquiti UniFi
- Zabbix vs Domotz
- Zabbix vs Headscale
- Zabbix vs HiveMQ

