Databases · head to head
Aiven vs Icinga

Icinga
Networking
Open source infrastructure monitoring, free at its core, with paid support and modules sold separately by Icinga GmbH
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Aiven the free plan gives 1 VM with 1 CPU, 1 GB RAM and 1 GB storage, and cannot pick a specific cloud or region; Icinga the free core has no vendor SLA, so production incidents are supported through community channels unless a paid support subscription is purchased
- They diverge on capability: Aiven covers Multi-cloud Support, Icinga covers Forever Free core.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Aiven and Icinga actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Aiven
- Multi-cloud Support
- Automated Backups
- Seamless Upgrades
- VPC Peering
- End-to-end Encryption
- Compliance
- Observability
- PostgreSQL
Only in Icinga
- Forever Free core
- Clustering and HA
- Icinga Web and API
- Enterprise modules (paid)
- Integration ecosystem
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Aiven
- Running managed open source databases without operating themnot Icinga
- Multi-cloud deployment across AWS, Google Cloud, Azure, DigitalOcean, OVH and UpCloudnot Icinga
- Highly available data services with automatic failovernot Icinga
- Prototyping on a small free instance before scaling upnot Icinga
Icinga
- An IT team wanting unlimited-scale open source monitoring with no per-host licence fee, running standard Linux distributionsnot Aiven
- An organisation on RHEL or SLES that wants officially packaged Icinga builds via the repository subscription rather than building from sourcenot Aiven
- A team wanting an SLA-backed vendor support relationship rather than relying on community forums for a production monitoring systemnot Aiven
- A company already invested in Prometheus and Grafana wanting to add host and service-level alerting from a compatible open source toolnot Aiven
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Aiven
- The free plan gives 1 VM with 1 CPU, 1 GB RAM and 1 GB storage, and cannot pick a specific cloud or region
- Free and Developer tiers have no integrations and no connection pooling
- Connection pooling, database forks and dynamic disk sizing need the Business or Premium plan
- A 99.99 percent uptime SLA starts at the Startup plan from $75 a month
- High availability with automatic failover starts at Business from $180 a month
Icinga
- The free core has no vendor SLA, so production incidents are supported through community channels unless a paid support subscription is purchased
- Repository access for enterprise Linux distributions like RHEL and SLES is not free, so organisations standardised on those distributions face a real recurring cost most open source monitoring buyers do not expect
- Enterprise modules are gated behind a separate module subscription, so some functionality demonstrated in marketing material is not part of the free core
- Self-hosting and operating Icinga requires real Linux and monitoring expertise that a commercial SaaS tool would otherwise absorb, so total cost of ownership includes staff time not captured in the licence price
- Pricing for the paid subscriptions varies by geographic region and is not published as a single global rate card, complicating budgeting for multinational organisations
- The web interface and configuration language, while capable, are less immediately polished than a fully commercial tool like PRTG, and initial setup takes longer to reach a usable state
Pricing, plan by plan
Aiven
Free- Free TrialFree
- $300 credits
- 30 day trial
- All services
- Startup$19/month
- Single node
- Basic support
- Daily backups
Icinga
Free- IcingaFree
- Unlimited hosts and services
- Clustering and API
- Community support
- Support Subscription$undefined/year
- Professional support (8x5 or 24/7)
- Includes module and repository subscriptions
Which should you pick?
Choose Aiven if
- You need multi-cloud support.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Aws, Azure, Gcp, Do.
- You also want automated backups.
Choose Icinga if
- You need forever free core.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Web.
- You also want clustering and ha.
Questions people ask
- Is Aiven or Icinga better?
- Neither clearly leads. Aiven starts at Free and Icinga at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Aiven or Icinga?
- Aiven starts at Free and Icinga at Free.
- Does Aiven or Icinga run on more platforms?
- Aiven runs on Web, Aws, Azure, Gcp, Do. Icinga runs on Linux, Web.
- Can I use Aiven for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Aiven best used for?
- Aiven is most often used for running managed open source databases without operating them, multi-cloud deployment across aws, google cloud, azure, digitalocean, ovh and upcloud, highly available data services with automatic failover, prototyping on a small free instance before scaling up. Of those, running managed open source databases without operating them and multi-cloud deployment across aws, google cloud, azure, digitalocean, ovh and upcloud are not what Icinga is typically brought in for.
- What can Aiven do that Icinga cannot?
- Aiven covers Multi-cloud Support, Automated Backups, Seamless Upgrades, VPC Peering. Icinga covers Forever Free core, Clustering and HA, Icinga Web and API, Enterprise modules (paid).
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Aiven: What does Aiven's free tier include and does it have any time limit?
The free tier includes PostgreSQL with 1 VM, 1 CPU, 1 GB RAM, and 1 GB storage with access to limited cloud and region selections. There are no time limitations on the free tier, though Aiven reserves the right to shut down accounts that violate policies or remain unused for extended periods.
SourceIcinga: Is Icinga free to run in production?
Yes, the core platform has no licence fee and no limit on hosts or services monitored.
Aiven: How is Aiven billed and what are the monthly costs for each tier?
Aiven bills services by the hour and invoices monthly, charging only for what you actually run. PostgreSQL pricing starts at 5 dollars per month for Developer, 12 dollars per month for Hobbyist, 75 dollars per month for Startup, 180 dollars per month for Business, and 270 dollars per month for Premium. All paid tiers offer hourly billing options as well.
SourceIcinga: What do the paid subscriptions actually add?
A repository subscription provides packages for certain enterprise Linux distributions, a module subscription unlocks enterprise-only add-on modules, and a support subscription bundles both with professional support.
Aiven: What backup retention periods are included at different Aiven tiers?
Backup retention increases with tier level: Startup tier provides 2 days of backup retention, Business tier offers 14 days, and Premium tier includes 30 days. Point-in-time restore is available on all paid tiers.
SourceIcinga: Is Icinga related to Nagios?
Yes, it originated as a fork of Nagios but has since diverged into an independently developed platform.
Aiven: Is high availability included in Aiven pricing or charged separately?
High availability, backups, and routine maintenance are all included in the tier costs with no separate charges. The Business tier includes 2 VMs with automatic failover, and Premium includes 3 VMs with a second standby node.
SourceAiven: Does Aiven offer a trial period to test premium features?
Aiven offers a 30-day free trial to access premium features beyond what the free plan provides.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Aiven vs PostgreSQL
- Aiven vs Instaclustr
- Aiven vs Amazon Aurora
- Aiven vs Cockroach Labs
- Aiven vs Airtable
- Aiven vs Google Cloud SQL
- Aiven vs Apache Kafka
- Aiven vs RabbitMQ
- Aiven vs Azure SQL
- Aiven vs MariaDB
- Aiven vs LanceDB
- Aiven vs Marqo
- Aiven vs Nile
- Aiven vs Ninox
- Aiven vs Presto
- Aiven vs Privacera
- Aiven vs Amazon RDS
- Aiven vs Apache Flink
- Aiven vs LibreNMS
- Aiven vs PRTG Network Monitor
- Aiven vs Zabbix
- Aiven vs pfSense
- Aiven vs OpenVPN
- Aiven vs Traefik
- Aiven vs Eclipse Mosquitto
- Aiven vs Nebula
- Aiven vs Consul
- Aiven vs Auvik
- Aiven vs Domotz
- Aiven vs ThousandEyes
- Aiven vs Headscale
- Aiven vs HiveMQ
- Aiven vs Netdata
- Aiven vs OPNsense
- Icinga vs PostgreSQL
- Icinga vs Instaclustr
- Icinga vs Amazon Aurora
- Icinga vs Cockroach Labs
- Icinga vs Airtable
- Icinga vs Google Cloud SQL
- Icinga vs Apache Kafka
- Icinga vs RabbitMQ
- Icinga vs Azure SQL
- Icinga vs MariaDB
- Icinga vs LanceDB
- Icinga vs Marqo
- Icinga vs Nile
- Icinga vs Ninox
- Icinga vs Presto
- Icinga vs Privacera
- Icinga vs Amazon RDS
- Icinga vs Apache Flink
- Icinga vs LibreNMS
- Icinga vs PRTG Network Monitor
- Icinga vs Zabbix
- Icinga vs pfSense
- Icinga vs OpenVPN
- Icinga vs Traefik
- Icinga vs Eclipse Mosquitto
- Icinga vs Nebula
- Icinga vs Consul
- Icinga vs Auvik
- Icinga vs Domotz
- Icinga vs ThousandEyes
- Icinga vs Headscale
- Icinga vs HiveMQ
- Icinga vs Netdata
- Icinga vs OPNsense

