Databases · head to head
Aiven vs VerneMQ

VerneMQ
Databases
Erlang MQTT broker whose source is Apache 2.0 but whose official binaries need a paid subscription
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Aiven the free plan gives 1 VM with 1 CPU, 1 GB RAM and 1 GB storage, and cannot pick a specific cloud or region; VerneMQ the official binaries and Docker images are not Apache 2.0 but sit under a EULA requiring a yearly commercial subscription, a distinction easy to miss and awkward to discover during a licence audit.
- They diverge on capability: Aiven covers Multi-cloud Support, VerneMQ covers Erlang/OTP clustering.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Aiven and VerneMQ actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Databases).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Aiven
- Multi-cloud Support
- Automated Backups
- Seamless Upgrades
- VPC Peering
- End-to-end Encryption
- Compliance
- Observability
- PostgreSQL
Only in VerneMQ
- Erlang/OTP clustering
- MQTT 5.0 support
- Plugin system
- Backpressure handling
- Bridge support
- Metrics export
- MQTT over WebSockets
- Pluggable auth backends
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Aiven
- Running managed open source databases without operating themnot VerneMQ
- Multi-cloud deployment across AWS, Google Cloud, Azure, DigitalOcean, OVH and UpCloudnot VerneMQ
- Highly available data services with automatic failovernot VerneMQ
- Prototyping on a small free instance before scaling upnot VerneMQ
VerneMQ
- An industrial operator that wants an MQTT broker with predictable memory behaviour and no data integration features it will not usenot Aiven
- A team building from source to stay strictly under Apache 2.0 terms with no vendor licence entanglementnot Aiven
- A deployment needing custom authentication logic implemented as a plugin in Lua or over a webhooknot Aiven
- An organisation that wants a broker maintained by a small European company rather than by a vendor that keeps changing licencesnot Aiven
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Aiven
- The free plan gives 1 VM with 1 CPU, 1 GB RAM and 1 GB storage, and cannot pick a specific cloud or region
- Free and Developer tiers have no integrations and no connection pooling
- Connection pooling, database forks and dynamic disk sizing need the Business or Premium plan
- A 99.99 percent uptime SLA starts at the Startup plan from $75 a month
- High availability with automatic failover starts at Business from $180 a month
VerneMQ
- The official binaries and Docker images are not Apache 2.0 but sit under a EULA requiring a yearly commercial subscription, a distinction easy to miss and awkward to discover during a licence audit.
- Octavo Labs is a very small company, so support depth, response times and the bus factor on the codebase are materially thinner than at HiveMQ or EMQ.
- There is no data integration or rule engine layer, so routing messages into a database means writing and operating your own consumer service.
- Operating an Erlang cluster requires runtime knowledge that most teams do not have and will use for nothing else in their stack.
- There is no vendor-managed cloud offering, so every deployment is self-operated with the infrastructure and on-call cost that implies.
Pricing, plan by plan
Aiven
Free- Free TrialFree
- $300 credits
- 30 day trial
- All services
- Startup$19/month
- Single node
- Basic support
- Daily backups
VerneMQ
Free- Source buildFree
- Apache 2.0 licensed source from GitHub
- Full clustering and plugin capability
- You compile and package it yourself
- Binary packages and Docker images$undefined/year
- Covered by the VerneMQ EULA, not Apache 2.0
- Yearly usage subscription expected for commercial use
- Official builds and Docker images
- Commercial support$undefined/year
- Evaluation, customisation and operations assistance
- Custom development
- Long-term maintenance agreements
Which should you pick?
Choose Aiven if
- You need multi-cloud support.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Aws, Azure, Gcp, Do.
- You also want automated backups.
Choose VerneMQ if
- You need erlang/otp clustering.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, macOS, Kubernetes.
- You also want mqtt 5.0 support.
Questions people ask
- Is Aiven or VerneMQ better?
- Neither clearly leads. Aiven starts at Free and VerneMQ at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Aiven or VerneMQ?
- Aiven starts at Free and VerneMQ at Free.
- Does Aiven or VerneMQ run on more platforms?
- Aiven runs on Web, Aws, Azure, Gcp, Do. VerneMQ runs on Linux, Docker, macOS, Kubernetes.
- Can I use Aiven for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Aiven best used for?
- Aiven is most often used for running managed open source databases without operating them, multi-cloud deployment across aws, google cloud, azure, digitalocean, ovh and upcloud, highly available data services with automatic failover, prototyping on a small free instance before scaling up. Of those, running managed open source databases without operating them and multi-cloud deployment across aws, google cloud, azure, digitalocean, ovh and upcloud are not what VerneMQ is typically brought in for.
- What can Aiven do that VerneMQ cannot?
- Aiven covers Multi-cloud Support, Automated Backups, Seamless Upgrades, VPC Peering. VerneMQ covers Erlang/OTP clustering, MQTT 5.0 support, Plugin system, Backpressure handling.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Aiven: What does Aiven's free tier include and does it have any time limit?
The free tier includes PostgreSQL with 1 VM, 1 CPU, 1 GB RAM, and 1 GB storage with access to limited cloud and region selections. There are no time limitations on the free tier, though Aiven reserves the right to shut down accounts that violate policies or remain unused for extended periods.
SourceVerneMQ: Is VerneMQ free?
The source is Apache 2.0 and free. The official binary packages and Docker images are covered by a separate EULA that expects a yearly fee for commercial use.
Aiven: How is Aiven billed and what are the monthly costs for each tier?
Aiven bills services by the hour and invoices monthly, charging only for what you actually run. PostgreSQL pricing starts at 5 dollars per month for Developer, 12 dollars per month for Hobbyist, 75 dollars per month for Startup, 180 dollars per month for Business, and 270 dollars per month for Premium. All paid tiers offer hourly billing options as well.
SourceVerneMQ: Is the project still maintained?
Yes. Octavo Labs AG in Zurich continues to publish 2.x releases, most recently in 2026.
Aiven: What backup retention periods are included at different Aiven tiers?
Backup retention increases with tier level: Startup tier provides 2 days of backup retention, Business tier offers 14 days, and Premium tier includes 30 days. Point-in-time restore is available on all paid tiers.
SourceVerneMQ: Does it have a managed cloud?
No. Every deployment is self-hosted, with commercial support available from Octavo Labs.
Aiven: Is high availability included in Aiven pricing or charged separately?
High availability, backups, and routine maintenance are all included in the tier costs with no separate charges. The Business tier includes 2 VMs with automatic failover, and Premium includes 3 VMs with a second standby node.
SourceVerneMQ: How does it compare to EMQX?
Narrower in features and without a rule engine, but with a simpler licence story for source builds after EMQX moved to BSL.
Aiven: Does Aiven offer a trial period to test premium features?
Aiven offers a 30-day free trial to access premium features beyond what the free plan provides.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Aiven vs PostgreSQL
- Aiven vs Instaclustr
- Aiven vs Amazon Aurora
- Aiven vs Cockroach Labs
- Aiven vs Airtable
- Aiven vs Google Cloud SQL
- Aiven vs Apache Kafka
- Aiven vs RabbitMQ
- Aiven vs Azure SQL
- Aiven vs MariaDB
- Aiven vs LanceDB
- Aiven vs Marqo
- Aiven vs Nile
- Aiven vs Ninox
- Aiven vs Presto
- Aiven vs Privacera
- Aiven vs Amazon RDS
- Aiven vs Apache Flink
- Aiven vs EMQX
- Aiven vs NATS
- Aiven vs TIBCO Enterprise Message Service
- Aiven vs Canary Labs
- Aiven vs Solace PubSub+
- Aiven vs TimescaleDB
- Aiven vs Apache Pulsar
- Aiven vs StarRocks
- Aiven vs Timeplus
- Aiven vs Chroma
- Aiven vs Cloudinary
- Aiven vs Convex
- Aiven vs Dgraph
- Aiven vs Dragonfly
- Aiven vs Dremio
- VerneMQ vs PostgreSQL
- VerneMQ vs Instaclustr
- VerneMQ vs Amazon Aurora
- VerneMQ vs Cockroach Labs
- VerneMQ vs Airtable
- VerneMQ vs Google Cloud SQL
- VerneMQ vs Apache Kafka
- VerneMQ vs RabbitMQ
- VerneMQ vs Azure SQL
- VerneMQ vs MariaDB
- VerneMQ vs LanceDB
- VerneMQ vs Marqo
- VerneMQ vs Nile
- VerneMQ vs Ninox
- VerneMQ vs Presto
- VerneMQ vs Privacera
- VerneMQ vs Amazon RDS
- VerneMQ vs Apache Flink
- VerneMQ vs EMQX
- VerneMQ vs NATS
- VerneMQ vs TIBCO Enterprise Message Service
- VerneMQ vs Canary Labs
- VerneMQ vs Solace PubSub+
- VerneMQ vs TimescaleDB
- VerneMQ vs Apache Pulsar
- VerneMQ vs StarRocks
- VerneMQ vs Timeplus
- VerneMQ vs Chroma
- VerneMQ vs Cloudinary
- VerneMQ vs Convex
- VerneMQ vs Dgraph
- VerneMQ vs Dragonfly
- VerneMQ vs Dremio

