Cybersecurity · head to head
Aikido vs Quantexa

Aikido
Cybersecurity
Unified security platform automating vulnerability detection and fixing across development
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Quantexa
Cybersecurity
Entity resolution and network analytics for financial crime investigation
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Aikido has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Aikido free plan includes fair-usage limits on repos and container images; Quantexa pricing is never published and lands in the seven figure range annually for a tier one deployment, so it is out of reach for mid-sized institutions no matter how well the analytics would fit.
- They diverge on capability: Aikido covers Static Application Security Testing (SAST), Quantexa covers Entity resolution.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Aikido and Quantexa actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Aikido
- Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
- Software Composition Analysis (SCA)
- AutoFix
- Secrets detection
- Cloud Security Posture Management
- AI-powered penetration testing
- Device protection
- False positive reduction
Only in Quantexa
- Entity resolution
- Network generation
- Contextual monitoring
- Investigation workspace
- Data fusion
- Deployment on customer cloud
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Aikido
- Developer-friendly security integrated into PR workflowsnot Quantexa
- Automated vulnerability remediation with context-aware alertsnot Quantexa
- Consolidation of fragmented security tools across development lifecyclenot Quantexa
- Cloud infrastructure security posture monitoringnot Quantexa
- Supply chain attack prevention and malware detectionnot Quantexa
Quantexa
- A bank whose AML alert backlog is dominated by false positives and wants network context to close them fasternot Aikido
- Sanctions investigation where the sanctioned party is not the account holder but a connected director or shareholdernot Aikido
- Merging customer records across retail, commercial and wealth divisions after an acquisition to see total exposurenot Aikido
- A tax or benefits agency looking for organised fraud rings rather than individual claimantsnot Aikido
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Aikido
- Free plan includes fair-usage limits on repos and container images
- Pricing increases significantly with user and repository scale
- Advanced features like penetration testing and VM scanning limited to higher tiers
- Device protection limited to Development environments only
- Requires multiple plan tiers for full platform coverage
Quantexa
- Pricing is never published and lands in the seven figure range annually for a tier one deployment, so it is out of reach for mid-sized institutions no matter how well the analytics would fit.
- Output quality is bounded by input data quality, and organisations without governed customer data spend the first phase of the programme fixing feeds rather than catching criminals.
- Implementation typically requires a systems integrator and runs into quarters rather than weeks, so the business case has to survive a long period with no operational benefit.
- The platform augments rather than replaces existing transaction monitoring, so you keep paying for the incumbent system alongside it and total compliance technology spend rises before it falls.
- Skills are scarce; the platform needs people who understand both Spark scale data engineering and financial crime typologies, and those people are hard to recruit and easy to lose.
Pricing, plan by plan
Aikido
Free- DeveloperFree
- Up to 2 users
- Dependency scanning (SCA)
- SAST and AI SAST
- Pro$600/month
- Up to 10 users
- All Basic features
- On-premise scanning
- Advanced$600/month
- Up to 10 users
- All Pro features
- Broker for internal apps
- Enterprise$null/custom
- Custom pricing for tailored modules
- Dedicated account management
- Custom SLAs
Quantexa
On request- Quantexa Platform$undefined/year
- Entity resolution and network generation
- Deployed in customer cloud tenancy
- Priced by data volume and use case count
Which should you pick?
Choose Aikido if
- You need static application security testing (sast).
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, CI/CD, IDE.
- You also want software composition analysis (sca).
Choose Quantexa if
- You need entity resolution.
- You work on Web, Linux.
- You also want network generation.
Questions people ask
- Is Aikido or Quantexa better?
- Neither clearly leads. Aikido starts at Free and Quantexa at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Aikido or Quantexa?
- Aikido has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Aikido and On request for Quantexa.
- Does Aikido or Quantexa run on more platforms?
- Aikido runs on Web, CI/CD, IDE. Quantexa runs on Web, Linux.
- Can I use Aikido for free?
- Yes. Aikido has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Quantexa starts at On request.
- What is Aikido best used for?
- Aikido is most often used for developer-friendly security integrated into pr workflows, automated vulnerability remediation with context-aware alerts, consolidation of fragmented security tools across development lifecycle, cloud infrastructure security posture monitoring. Of those, developer-friendly security integrated into pr workflows and automated vulnerability remediation with context-aware alerts are not what Quantexa is typically brought in for.
- What can Aikido do that Quantexa cannot?
- Aikido covers Static Application Security Testing (SAST), Software Composition Analysis (SCA), AutoFix, Secrets detection. Quantexa covers Entity resolution, Network generation, Contextual monitoring, Investigation workspace.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Aikido: What is included in Aikido's free Developer plan?
The free Developer plan includes up to 2 users with SAST, SCA, secrets detection, cloud scanning, and license risk detection. Fair-usage limits apply: 10 repos, 2 container images, 1 domain, and 1 cloud account.
SourceQuantexa: Does Quantexa replace our transaction monitoring system?
No. It usually sits alongside it, adding network context to the alerts that system generates and to investigations.
Aikido: What is AutoFix and how does it work?
AutoFix is Aikido's automated vulnerability remediation feature that identifies vulnerabilities and suggests or applies specific code fixes automatically, reducing manual remediation effort.
SourceQuantexa: Where does our data go?
Into your own cloud tenancy in the normal deployment model. Quantexa does not require you to send customer data to a shared multi-tenant service.
Aikido: How many false positives does Aikido reduce?
Aikido reduces false positives by 99%, using AI-powered context awareness to filter noise and focus on vulnerabilities that present real business risk.
SourceQuantexa: How is it priced?
Not publicly. Expect an annual subscription scaled by data volume and number of use cases, plus separate implementation cost.
Aikido: What integrations does Aikido support?
Aikido integrates with Jira, Linear, Slack, Teams, GitHub, GitLab, and other popular development tools to fit into existing workflows.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Aikido vs Snyk
- Aikido vs Veracode
- Aikido vs Tenable
- Aikido vs Legit Security
- Aikido vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- Aikido vs Qualys VMDR
- Aikido vs Arnica
- Aikido vs Sysdig
- Aikido vs Akeyless
- Aikido vs Infisical
- Aikido vs Tanium
- Aikido vs Doppler
- Aikido vs Passbolt
- Aikido vs Ping Identity
- Aikido vs Proofpoint
- Aikido vs Rapid7 InsightVM
- Aikido vs Recorded Future
- Aikido vs Silent Eight
- Aikido vs NICE Actimize
- Aikido vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Aikido vs Feedzai
- Aikido vs ThetaRay
- Aikido vs Jumio
- Aikido vs Fenergo
- Aikido vs Sumsub
- Aikido vs iDenfy
- Aikido vs Shufti Pro
- Aikido vs Unit21
- Aikido vs Sardine
- Aikido vs Syft
- Aikido vs Trivy
- Aikido vs Trulioo
- Quantexa vs Snyk
- Quantexa vs Veracode
- Quantexa vs Tenable
- Quantexa vs Legit Security
- Quantexa vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- Quantexa vs Qualys VMDR
- Quantexa vs Arnica
- Quantexa vs Sysdig
- Quantexa vs Akeyless
- Quantexa vs Infisical
- Quantexa vs Tanium
- Quantexa vs Doppler
- Quantexa vs Passbolt
- Quantexa vs Ping Identity
- Quantexa vs Proofpoint
- Quantexa vs Rapid7 InsightVM
- Quantexa vs Recorded Future
- Quantexa vs Silent Eight
- Quantexa vs NICE Actimize
- Quantexa vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Quantexa vs Feedzai
- Quantexa vs ThetaRay
- Quantexa vs Jumio
- Quantexa vs Fenergo
- Quantexa vs Sumsub
- Quantexa vs iDenfy
- Quantexa vs Shufti Pro
- Quantexa vs Unit21
- Quantexa vs Sardine
- Quantexa vs Syft
- Quantexa vs Trivy
- Quantexa vs Trulioo
