Cybersecurity · head to head
Aikido vs Cody

Aikido
Cybersecurity
Unified security platform automating vulnerability detection and fixing across development
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Aikido free plan includes fair-usage limits on repos and container images; Cody sourcegraph now publishes a single Enterprise plan starting at $16K, with no free or individual Pro tier listed on the pricing page
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Aikido and Cody actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Aikido
- Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
- Software Composition Analysis (SCA)
- AutoFix
- Secrets detection
- Cloud Security Posture Management
- AI-powered penetration testing
- Device protection
- False positive reduction
Only in Cody
Nothing recorded that Aikido does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Aikido
- Developer-friendly security integrated into PR workflowsnot Cody
- Automated vulnerability remediation with context-aware alertsnot Cody
- Consolidation of fragmented security tools across development lifecyclenot Cody
- Cloud infrastructure security posture monitoringnot Cody
- Supply chain attack prevention and malware detectionnot Cody
Cody
- Code completion and intelligent autocomplete in IDEsnot Aikido
- Developer chat with codebase context awarenessnot Aikido
- Automated debugging and error identificationnot Aikido
- Customizable prompts for workflow automationnot Aikido
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Aikido
- Free plan includes fair-usage limits on repos and container images
- Pricing increases significantly with user and repository scale
- Advanced features like penetration testing and VM scanning limited to higher tiers
- Device protection limited to Development environments only
- Requires multiple plan tiers for full platform coverage
Cody
- Sourcegraph now publishes a single Enterprise plan starting at $16K, with no free or individual Pro tier listed on the pricing page
- sourcegraph.com/cody redirects to the documentation rather than a Cody product or pricing page
- AI features are metered as credits included per user, and exceeding the allocation requires buying a higher volume bucket
- Volume credit buckets are sold as an add-on rather than included
- A customer success manager and premium support are optional paid extras on top of the Enterprise plan
- Standard support is 24x5 rather than 24x7, with round-the-clock coverage sold as an upgrade
- The published $16K figure is a starting price that scales with team size, so the actual cost is quoted rather than listed
Pricing, plan by plan
Aikido
Free- DeveloperFree
- Up to 2 users
- Dependency scanning (SCA)
- SAST and AI SAST
- Pro$600/month
- Up to 10 users
- All Basic features
- On-premise scanning
- Advanced$600/month
- Up to 10 users
- All Pro features
- Broker for internal apps
- Enterprise$null/custom
- Custom pricing for tailored modules
- Dedicated account management
- Custom SLAs
Cody
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Cody review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Aikido if
- You need static application security testing (sast).
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, CI/CD, IDE.
- You also want software composition analysis (sca).
Questions people ask
- Is Aikido or Cody better?
- Neither clearly leads. Aikido starts at Free and Cody at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Aikido or Cody?
- Aikido starts at Free and Cody at Free.
- Does Aikido or Cody run on more platforms?
- Aikido runs on Web, CI/CD, IDE. Cody runs on Web.
- Can I use Aikido for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Aikido best used for?
- Aikido is most often used for developer-friendly security integrated into pr workflows, automated vulnerability remediation with context-aware alerts, consolidation of fragmented security tools across development lifecycle, cloud infrastructure security posture monitoring. Of those, developer-friendly security integrated into pr workflows and automated vulnerability remediation with context-aware alerts are not what Cody is typically brought in for.
- What can Aikido do that Cody cannot?
- Aikido covers Static Application Security Testing (SAST), Software Composition Analysis (SCA), AutoFix, Secrets detection.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Aikido: What is included in Aikido's free Developer plan?
The free Developer plan includes up to 2 users with SAST, SCA, secrets detection, cloud scanning, and license risk detection. Fair-usage limits apply: 10 repos, 2 container images, 1 domain, and 1 cloud account.
SourceCody: Is Cody free?
Cody offers a free tier for individual developers via VS Code, JetBrains, Visual Studio, and the web app. Unlimited free usage is available for solo developers.
SourceAikido: What is AutoFix and how does it work?
AutoFix is Aikido's automated vulnerability remediation feature that identifies vulnerabilities and suggests or applies specific code fixes automatically, reducing manual remediation effort.
SourceCody: What does Cody Enterprise cost?
Cody Enterprise pricing is custom and requires contacting Sourcegraph sales. It is available for Sourcegraph Enterprise customers and must be quoted based on your deployment and usage needs.
SourceAikido: How many false positives does Aikido reduce?
Aikido reduces false positives by 99%, using AI-powered context awareness to filter noise and focus on vulnerabilities that present real business risk.
SourceCody: What LLMs does Cody use?
Cody uses the latest large language models for code completions, chat, and debugging. It leverages Sourcegraph's advanced Search API to pull codebase context from local and remote repositories.
SourceAikido: What integrations does Aikido support?
Aikido integrates with Jira, Linear, Slack, Teams, GitHub, GitLab, and other popular development tools to fit into existing workflows.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Aikido vs Snyk
- Aikido vs Veracode
- Aikido vs Tenable
- Aikido vs Legit Security
- Aikido vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- Aikido vs Qualys VMDR
- Aikido vs Arnica
- Aikido vs Sysdig
- Aikido vs Akeyless
- Aikido vs Infisical
- Aikido vs Tanium
- Aikido vs Doppler
- Aikido vs Passbolt
- Aikido vs Ping Identity
- Aikido vs Proofpoint
- Aikido vs Rapid7 InsightVM
- Aikido vs Recorded Future
- Aikido vs Turborepo
- Aikido vs Visual Studio Code
- Aikido vs ESLint
- Aikido vs pnpm
- Aikido vs Sourcegraph
- Aikido vs Sweep
- Aikido vs Deep Code
- Aikido vs GitHub Copilot
- Aikido vs Bazel
- Aikido vs Fig
- Aikido vs GoLand
- Aikido vs Steampipe
- Aikido vs Tilt
- Aikido vs WarpBuild
- Aikido vs Webpack
- Aikido vs Avo
- Aikido vs Azure DevOps
- Aikido vs PhpStorm
- Cody vs Snyk
- Cody vs Veracode
- Cody vs Tenable
- Cody vs Legit Security
- Cody vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- Cody vs Qualys VMDR
- Cody vs Arnica
- Cody vs Sysdig
- Cody vs Akeyless
- Cody vs Infisical
- Cody vs Tanium
- Cody vs Doppler
- Cody vs Passbolt
- Cody vs Ping Identity
- Cody vs Proofpoint
- Cody vs Rapid7 InsightVM
- Cody vs Recorded Future
- Cody vs Turborepo
- Cody vs Visual Studio Code
- Cody vs ESLint
- Cody vs pnpm
- Cody vs Sourcegraph
- Cody vs Sweep
- Cody vs Deep Code
- Cody vs GitHub Copilot
- Cody vs Bazel
- Cody vs Fig
- Cody vs GoLand
- Cody vs Steampipe
- Cody vs Tilt
- Cody vs WarpBuild
- Cody vs Webpack
- Cody vs Avo
- Cody vs Azure DevOps
- Cody vs PhpStorm

