Softwr

Cybersecurity · head to head

Legit Security vs Sourcegraph

Legit Security logo

Legit Security

Cybersecurity

AI-native ASPM platform securing AI-generated code before deployment

From
On request
Free plan
No
Sourcegraph logo

Sourcegraph

Developer Tools

Code search and intelligence platform for large codebases with Cody AI assistant

From
$16000/year
Free plan
No

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Legit Security pricing requires contacting sales, making cost comparison difficult; Sourcegraph enterprise pricing starting at $16k annually creates significant barrier for small teams
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Legit Security and Sourcegraph actually diverge.

Attributes where Legit Security and Sourcegraph differ
AttributeLegit SecuritySourcegraph
Starting priceOn request$16000/year
Pricing modelContact sales for custom pricingsubscription
PlatformsWeb, IDE, CI/CDCloud, Self-hosted
CategoryCybersecurityDeveloper Tools

Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Legit Security

  • VibeGuard AI code scanning
  • Unified vulnerability remediation
  • Code Security (SAST/SCA)
  • Secrets detection and prevention
  • Software Supply Chain Security
  • Code change detection
  • AI-powered remediation
  • Risk scoring

Only in Sourcegraph

Nothing recorded that Legit Security does not also cover.

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Legit Security

  • Securing AI-generated code from GitHub Copilot and IDE assistantsnot Sourcegraph
  • Consolidating vulnerability findings from multiple AppSec toolsnot Sourcegraph
  • Preventing credential leaks across development workspacesnot Sourcegraph
  • Automating remediation workflows with AI-powered suggestionsnot Sourcegraph
  • Compliance automation with SBOM generation and enforcementnot Sourcegraph

Sourcegraph

  • Large-scale code migrations across hundreds of repositoriesnot Legit Security
  • Enterprise governance and code ownership trackingnot Legit Security
  • AI-assisted bug hunting and security pattern detectionnot Legit Security
  • Onboarding engineers into large unfamiliar codebasesnot Legit Security
  • Regulatory compliance and code audit trailsnot Legit Security

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Legit Security

  • Pricing requires contacting sales, making cost comparison difficult
  • No published pricing tiers or free tier available
  • Requires integration with existing SAST and SCA tools for full capability
  • Focused primarily on code security within development lifecycle
  • Newer entrant with less market presence than established competitors

Sourcegraph

  • Enterprise pricing starting at $16k annually creates significant barrier for small teams
  • No free tier or standard plan published; all options require custom sales engagement
  • Complex enterprise-only positioning limits adoption compared to GitHub Copilot's pervasiveness
  • Requires indexing entire codebase; not suitable for small or ephemeral projects

Pricing, plan by plan

Legit Security

On request

No published plan breakdown. See the Legit Security review.

Sourcegraph

$16000/year
  • Enterprise$16000/year
    • Scales with team size
    • Credits for AI features per user
    • Deep Search

Which should you pick?

Choose Legit Security if

  • You need vibeguard ai code scanning.
  • You work on Web, IDE, CI/CD.
  • You also want unified vulnerability remediation.

Choose Sourcegraph if

  • You work on Cloud, Self-hosted.

Questions people ask

Is Legit Security or Sourcegraph better?
Neither clearly leads. Legit Security starts at On request and Sourcegraph at $16000/year, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Legit Security or Sourcegraph?
Legit Security starts at On request and Sourcegraph at $16000/year.
Does Legit Security or Sourcegraph run on more platforms?
Legit Security runs on Web, IDE, CI/CD. Sourcegraph runs on Cloud, Self-hosted.
What is Legit Security best used for?
Legit Security is most often used for securing ai-generated code from github copilot and ide assistants, consolidating vulnerability findings from multiple appsec tools, preventing credential leaks across development workspaces, automating remediation workflows with ai-powered suggestions. Of those, securing ai-generated code from github copilot and ide assistants and consolidating vulnerability findings from multiple appsec tools are not what Sourcegraph is typically brought in for.
What can Legit Security do that Sourcegraph cannot?
Legit Security covers VibeGuard AI code scanning, Unified vulnerability remediation, Code Security (SAST/SCA), Secrets detection and prevention.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Legit Security: What is VibeGuard and how does it work?

VibeGuard is Legit Security's core feature that scans AI-generated code directly within IDEs like GitHub Copilot and Cursor, identifying vulnerabilities before code leaves the developer's editor.

Source
Legit Security: What AI code assistants does Legit Security support?

Legit Security integrates with GitHub Copilot, Cursor, and Claude to scan AI-generated code for vulnerabilities.

Source
Legit Security: How does Legit Security's AI remediation feature work?

The platform uses AI to suggest specific code fixes for identified vulnerabilities and can automatically create tickets in Jira with full context for developers to review and apply.

Source
Legit Security: Does Legit Security support compliance reporting?

Yes, Legit Security automates compliance automation with SBOM generation and can generate compliance reports for security and regulatory requirements.

Source
Share

Related pages

Other head to heads