ERP · head to head
ADempiere vs Ignition

ADempiere
ERP
Community-run open source ERP forked from Compiere, with no vendor behind it
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Ignition
Manufacturing
Industrial automation platform for SCADA, HMI and MES
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only ADempiere has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: ADempiere there is no company behind it, so there is no support contract to buy, no SLA, no escalation path and no roadmap commitment; if your implementation partner leaves the market you own the problem entirely.; Ignition requires real engineering to implement; it is a platform rather than a finished application
- They diverge on capability: ADempiere covers Application dictionary, Ignition covers Unlimited-client licensing.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which ADempiere and Ignition actually diverge.
| Attribute | ADempiere | Ignition |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | Open source, no licence fee | Per-server licensing with published module pricing; unlimited clients and tags |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Web, Windows, macOS, Linux, Self-hosted | Windows, Linux, macOS, Web |
| Category | ERP | Manufacturing |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in ADempiere
- Application dictionary
- Financial accounting
- Order to cash and procure to pay
- Inventory and warehouse
- Manufacturing
- Point of sale
- Workflow engine
- Java and PostgreSQL stack
Only in Ignition
- Unlimited-client licensing
- SCADA and HMI
- Historian
- MES modules
- Web-based clients
- Wide PLC support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
ADempiere
- A manufacturer in Latin America with an existing ADempiere consulting partner that needs localised tax and accounting behaviour a global vendor will not buildnot Ignition
- A company that wants to modify ERP screens and document workflows without a vendor change request, using the application dictionary rather than codenot Ignition
- An organisation with a hard requirement to keep financial data on its own servers under its own control with no cloud dependencynot Ignition
- A systems integrator building a vertical ERP product on a permissive base it can fork and ship without paying a licence feenot Ignition
Ignition
- Plants where per-tag licensing has made expansion a budget conversationnot ADempiere
- Replacing installed operator terminals with browser-based clientsnot ADempiere
- Connecting plant floor data to SQL and business systemsnot ADempiere
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
ADempiere
- There is no company behind it, so there is no support contract to buy, no SLA, no escalation path and no roadmap commitment; if your implementation partner leaves the market you own the problem entirely.
- The official website adempiere.net does not resolve, which strands most of the historic documentation and tutorials that search engines still point at and makes onboarding a new developer considerably harder.
- The last conventional stable release, 3.9.4, is from January 2023, so despite ongoing GitHub activity a buyer evaluating on release cadence sees a project moving slowly.
- iDempiere, a later fork of the same codebase, absorbed much of the developer community, so ADempiere competes for contributors with its own descendant and is the smaller of the two ecosystems.
- The interface and the Java Swing heritage feel dated, and staff coming from a modern cloud ERP will need training and will complain; expect resistance from finance and warehouse users during rollout.
Ignition
- Requires real engineering to implement; it is a platform rather than a finished application
- Steep learning curve, and Inductive Automation runs its own training programme because of it
- Self-hosted and self-supported by default, so plant IT carries the availability burden
- Module-based pricing means the entry figure is rarely the final one
Pricing, plan by plan
ADempiere
Free- Community editionFree
- GPL v2 licensed, no licence fee
- Full ERP, CRM, supply chain and POS modules
- Self-hosted on your own infrastructure
Ignition
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Ignition review.
Which should you pick?
Choose ADempiere if
- You need application dictionary.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Windows, macOS, Linux, Self-hosted.
- You also want financial accounting.
Choose Ignition if
- You need unlimited-client licensing.
- You work on Windows, Linux, macOS, Web.
- You also want scada and hmi.
Questions people ask
- Is ADempiere or Ignition better?
- Neither clearly leads. ADempiere starts at Free and Ignition at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, ADempiere or Ignition?
- ADempiere has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for ADempiere and On request for Ignition.
- Does ADempiere or Ignition run on more platforms?
- ADempiere runs on Web, Windows, macOS, Linux, Self-hosted. Ignition runs on Windows, Linux, macOS, Web.
- Can I use ADempiere for free?
- Yes. ADempiere has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Ignition starts at On request.
- What is ADempiere best used for?
- ADempiere is most often used for a manufacturer in latin america with an existing adempiere consulting partner that needs localised tax and accounting behaviour a global vendor will not build, a company that wants to modify erp screens and document workflows without a vendor change request, using the application dictionary rather than code, an organisation with a hard requirement to keep financial data on its own servers under its own control with no cloud dependency, a systems integrator building a vertical erp product on a permissive base it can fork and ship without paying a licence fee. Of those, a manufacturer in latin america with an existing adempiere consulting partner that needs localised tax and accounting behaviour a global vendor will not build and a company that wants to modify erp screens and document workflows without a vendor change request, using the application dictionary rather than code are not what Ignition is typically brought in for.
- What can ADempiere do that Ignition cannot?
- ADempiere covers Application dictionary, Financial accounting, Order to cash and procure to pay, Inventory and warehouse. Ignition covers Unlimited-client licensing, SCADA and HMI, Historian, MES modules.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
ADempiere: Should I choose ADempiere or iDempiere?
Look at iDempiere first. It is a later fork of the same codebase with a more active community and a modular OSGi architecture. Choose ADempiere if a specific partner or localisation you need only exists there.
Ignition: What does Ignition cost?
It publishes per-server module pricing with unlimited clients, tags and connections, so cost does not scale with how many people use it.
ADempiere: Is ADempiere free?
The software is GPL licensed with no licence fee. The cost is implementation, customisation and permanent in-house maintenance, which for a real deployment is substantial.
Ignition: Why does unlimited-client licensing matter?
Traditional SCADA is licensed per tag or per screen, which turns adding an operator terminal into a purchase. Ignition removes that ceiling.
ADempiere: Is the project still alive?
Development continues on GitHub with commits into 2026, but the official website is down and the last stable release is from January 2023. Treat it as maintained rather than actively advancing.
Ignition: Is it a finished application?
No, it is a platform. Screens, tags and logic are built for the specific plant, which is real engineering work.
ADempiere: What is the application dictionary?
It is the metadata layer inherited from Compiere that stores the definition of every window, field and validation rule as data, so you can change the application without touching source code.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- ADempiere vs Metasfresh
- ADempiere vs Odoo
- ADempiere vs Dolibarr
- ADempiere vs Tryton
- ADempiere vs iDempiere
- ADempiere vs Apache OFBiz
- ADempiere vs Axelor
- ADempiere vs QAD Adaptive ERP
- ADempiere vs SYSPRO
- ADempiere vs DEAR Systems
- ADempiere vs Fishbowl
- ADempiere vs NetSuite
- ADempiere vs Sage X3
- ADempiere vs Aptean
- ADempiere vs QAD
- ADempiere vs AVEVA System Platform
- ADempiere vs GENESIS Version 11
- ADempiere vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- ADempiere vs Siemens WinCC Unified
- ADempiere vs ABB 800xA
- ADempiere vs TrakSYS
- ADempiere vs Yokogawa CENTUM VP
- ADempiere vs COPA-DATA zenon
- ADempiere vs Litmus Edge
- ADempiere vs Kepware Server
- ADempiere vs Oden Technologies
- ADempiere vs PROGNOST Systems
- ADempiere vs 3YOURMIND
- ADempiere vs AMFG
- ADempiere vs Aras Innovator
- ADempiere vs Authentise
- ADempiere vs Arena PLM
- Ignition vs Metasfresh
- Ignition vs Odoo
- Ignition vs Dolibarr
- Ignition vs Tryton
- Ignition vs iDempiere
- Ignition vs Apache OFBiz
- Ignition vs Axelor
- Ignition vs QAD Adaptive ERP
- Ignition vs SYSPRO
- Ignition vs DEAR Systems
- Ignition vs Fishbowl
- Ignition vs NetSuite
- Ignition vs Sage X3
- Ignition vs Aptean
- Ignition vs QAD
- Ignition vs AVEVA System Platform
- Ignition vs GENESIS Version 11
- Ignition vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- Ignition vs Siemens WinCC Unified
- Ignition vs ABB 800xA
- Ignition vs TrakSYS
- Ignition vs Yokogawa CENTUM VP
- Ignition vs COPA-DATA zenon
- Ignition vs Litmus Edge
- Ignition vs Kepware Server
- Ignition vs Oden Technologies
- Ignition vs PROGNOST Systems
- Ignition vs 3YOURMIND
- Ignition vs AMFG
- Ignition vs Aras Innovator
- Ignition vs Authentise
- Ignition vs Arena PLM
