Cybersecurity · head to head
Acunetix vs Namespace

Acunetix
Cybersecurity
Web application security testing made easy
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No

Namespace
Developer Tools
The dev platform for the next 100 billion commits
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Only Namespace has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Acunetix pricing available by quote only; no transparent pricing published online; Namespace developer plan is pay-as-you-go only; minimum usage unclear
- They diverge on capability: Acunetix covers DAST scanning, Namespace covers Devboxes.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Acunetix and Namespace actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Acunetix
- DAST scanning
- IAST technology
- AcuSensor
- JavaScript security
- SQL injection testing
- XSS detection
- OWASP Top 10
- API security testing
Only in Namespace
- Devboxes
- GitHub Actions runners
- Docker builds
- Cross-invocation caching
- NVMe storage
- High-speed networking
- Multiple OS support
- Bazel and Turborepo support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Acunetix
- Scanning web applications for security vulnerabilitiesnot Namespace
- Testing APIs for exploitable weaknesses and threatsnot Namespace
- Automating dynamic application security testing (DAST)not Namespace
- Finding and validating security issues in production environmentsnot Namespace
Namespace
- Providing AI coding agents with cloud-based development environmentsnot Acunetix
- Accelerating CI builds with faster GitHub Actions runnersnot Acunetix
- Distributing builds across teams with managed infrastructurenot Acunetix
- Scaling development velocity for monorepo organizationsnot Acunetix
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Acunetix
- Pricing available by quote only; no transparent pricing published online
- Requires per-application licenses for comprehensive coverage
- Scanning speed and feature depth depend on subscription tier
- Advanced features like API security testing may require higher-tier plans
Namespace
- Developer plan is pay-as-you-go only; minimum usage unclear
- Team plan $100/mo is competitive but usage limits may be tight
- Devbox pricing separate at $0.004/minute could add up quickly
- Enterprise plan requires custom sales conversation
Pricing, plan by plan
Acunetix
On request- StandardFree
- Single user
- 5 targets
- Scheduled scans
- PremiumFree
- Multiple users
- Unlimited targets
- CI/CD integration
- Acunetix 360Free
- Enterprise features
- SDLC integration
- Custom workflows
Namespace
Free- DeveloperFree
- Pay-as-you-go
- On-demand compute
- Docker builds
- Team$100/month
- 100,000 unit minutes
- 1,000 Docker builds
- Everything in Developer
- Business$250/month
- 250,000 unit minutes
- 2,500 Docker builds
- Everything in Team
- Enterprise$undefined/custom
- Custom compute/Docker build limits
- Audit log export
- Enterprise SSO
Which should you pick?
Choose Acunetix if
- You need dast scanning.
- You work on Desktop, Web, Api.
- You also want iast technology.
Choose Namespace if
- You need devboxes.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud, Mac, Windows, Linux.
- You also want github actions runners.
Questions people ask
- Is Acunetix or Namespace better?
- Neither clearly leads. Acunetix starts at On request and Namespace at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Acunetix or Namespace?
- Namespace has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Acunetix and Free for Namespace.
- Does Acunetix or Namespace run on more platforms?
- Acunetix runs on Desktop, Web, Api. Namespace runs on Cloud, Mac, Windows, Linux.
- Can I use Namespace for free?
- Yes. Namespace has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Acunetix starts at On request.
- What is Acunetix best used for?
- Acunetix is most often used for scanning web applications for security vulnerabilities, testing apis for exploitable weaknesses and threats, automating dynamic application security testing (dast), finding and validating security issues in production environments. Of those, scanning web applications for security vulnerabilities and testing apis for exploitable weaknesses and threats are not what Namespace is typically brought in for.
- What can Acunetix do that Namespace cannot?
- Acunetix covers DAST scanning, IAST technology, AcuSensor, JavaScript security. Namespace covers Devboxes, GitHub Actions runners, Docker builds, Cross-invocation caching.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Acunetix: How much does Invicti (formerly Acunetix) cost?
Invicti pricing is available by quote based on your organization's needs, application count, and required features. The platform offers 8x faster scanning compared to competitors and detects 99.98% of exploitable vulnerabilities. Contact Invicti sales for a custom pricing proposal.
SourceNamespace: How is compute usage metered on the Developer plan?
Developer plan uses pay-as-you-go billing. Devboxes bill at $0.004 per minute. Storage and caching services have separate usage-based fees. A 30-day free trial is available to test usage patterns.
SourceNamespace: What is the difference between Team and Business plans?
Team ($100/mo) includes 100,000 unit minutes and 1,000 Docker builds with email support. Business ($250/mo) includes 250,000 unit minutes, 2,500 Docker builds, and high concurrency with a dedicated Slack channel.
SourceNamespace: Can Namespace support AI coding agents?
Yes, Namespace Devboxes are specifically designed as feature-rich development environments for AI coding agents, with full tooling and performance optimization.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Acunetix vs Norton 360
- Acunetix vs 1Password
- Acunetix vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Acunetix vs LastPass
- Acunetix vs Burp Suite
- Acunetix vs Veracode
- Acunetix vs Nessus
- Acunetix vs OWASP ZAP
- Acunetix vs Arnica
- Acunetix vs Doppler
- Acunetix vs Aikido
- Acunetix vs NordPass
- Acunetix vs One Identity
- Acunetix vs Ory Kratos
- Acunetix vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- Acunetix vs Tenable Nessus
- Acunetix vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Acunetix vs CodeSandbox
- Acunetix vs WarpBuild
- Acunetix vs Depot
- Acunetix vs Blacksmith
- Acunetix vs Earthly
- Acunetix vs Daytona
- Acunetix vs Ansible
- Acunetix vs Garden
- Acunetix vs ConfigCat
- Acunetix vs Nix
- Acunetix vs OpsLevel
- Acunetix vs StackBlitz
- Acunetix vs Steampipe
- Acunetix vs Tilt
- Acunetix vs Webpack
- Acunetix vs Avo
- Namespace vs Norton 360
- Namespace vs 1Password
- Namespace vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Namespace vs LastPass
- Namespace vs Burp Suite
- Namespace vs Veracode
- Namespace vs Nessus
- Namespace vs OWASP ZAP
- Namespace vs Arnica
- Namespace vs Doppler
- Namespace vs Aikido
- Namespace vs NordPass
- Namespace vs One Identity
- Namespace vs Ory Kratos
- Namespace vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- Namespace vs Tenable Nessus
- Namespace vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Namespace vs CodeSandbox
- Namespace vs WarpBuild
- Namespace vs Depot
- Namespace vs Blacksmith
- Namespace vs Earthly
- Namespace vs Daytona
- Namespace vs Ansible
- Namespace vs Garden
- Namespace vs ConfigCat
- Namespace vs Nix
- Namespace vs OpsLevel
- Namespace vs StackBlitz
- Namespace vs Steampipe
- Namespace vs Tilt
- Namespace vs Webpack
- Namespace vs Avo
