Cybersecurity · head to head
Acunetix vs Depot

Acunetix
Cybersecurity
Web application security testing made easy
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No

Depot
Developer Tools
Cloud-based builds and CI runs 55x faster with less cost
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Only Depot has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Acunetix pricing available by quote only; no transparent pricing published online; Depot developer plan minute limits may be insufficient for active development
- They diverge on capability: Acunetix covers DAST scanning, Depot covers Depot CI.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Acunetix and Depot actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Acunetix
- DAST scanning
- IAST technology
- AcuSensor
- JavaScript security
- SQL injection testing
- XSS detection
- OWASP Top 10
- API security testing
Only in Depot
- Depot CI
- Container builds
- GitHub Actions runners
- Distributed caching
- Build API
- Depot Registry
- Cross-platform builds
- SSH debugging
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Acunetix
- Scanning web applications for security vulnerabilitiesnot Depot
- Testing APIs for exploitable weaknesses and threatsnot Depot
- Automating dynamic application security testing (DAST)not Depot
- Finding and validating security issues in production environmentsnot Depot
Depot
- Accelerating Docker builds for container-based developmentnot Acunetix
- Replacing GitHub Actions runners with faster infrastructurenot Acunetix
- Distributing cache across Monorepo buildsnot Acunetix
- Debugging failed CI builds interactively with SSHnot Acunetix
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Acunetix
- Pricing available by quote only; no transparent pricing published online
- Requires per-application licenses for comprehensive coverage
- Scanning speed and feature depth depend on subscription tier
- Advanced features like API security testing may require higher-tier plans
Depot
- Developer plan minute limits may be insufficient for active development
- Startup plan at $200/mo is expensive for smaller teams
- Business plan requires custom pricing consultation
- macOS M2 runners not available on Developer plan
Pricing, plan by plan
Acunetix
On request- StandardFree
- Single user
- 5 targets
- Scheduled scans
- PremiumFree
- Multiple users
- Unlimited targets
- CI/CD integration
- Acunetix 360Free
- Enterprise features
- SDLC integration
- Custom workflows
Depot
Free- Developer$20/month
- 1 user
- 500 Docker build minutes per month
- 2,000 Depot CI minutes per month
- Startup$200/month
- Unlimited users
- 5,000 Docker build minutes per month
- 20,000 Depot CI minutes per month
- Business$undefined/custom
- Custom pricing
- Unlimited users
- Custom monthly compute
Which should you pick?
Choose Acunetix if
- You need dast scanning.
- You work on Desktop, Web, Api.
- You also want iast technology.
Choose Depot if
- You need depot ci.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud, GitHub, CLI.
- You also want container builds.
Questions people ask
- Is Acunetix or Depot better?
- Neither clearly leads. Acunetix starts at On request and Depot at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Acunetix or Depot?
- Depot has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Acunetix and Free for Depot.
- Does Acunetix or Depot run on more platforms?
- Acunetix runs on Desktop, Web, Api. Depot runs on Cloud, GitHub, CLI.
- Can I use Depot for free?
- Yes. Depot has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Acunetix starts at On request.
- What is Acunetix best used for?
- Acunetix is most often used for scanning web applications for security vulnerabilities, testing apis for exploitable weaknesses and threats, automating dynamic application security testing (dast), finding and validating security issues in production environments. Of those, scanning web applications for security vulnerabilities and testing apis for exploitable weaknesses and threats are not what Depot is typically brought in for.
- What can Acunetix do that Depot cannot?
- Acunetix covers DAST scanning, IAST technology, AcuSensor, JavaScript security. Depot covers Depot CI, Container builds, GitHub Actions runners, Distributed caching.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Acunetix: How much does Invicti (formerly Acunetix) cost?
Invicti pricing is available by quote based on your organization's needs, application count, and required features. The platform offers 8x faster scanning compared to competitors and detects 99.98% of exploitable vulnerabilities. Contact Invicti sales for a custom pricing proposal.
SourceDepot: How much faster are Depot runners compared to GitHub Actions?
Depot runners offer 30% faster CPUs and 10x faster networking than standard GitHub-hosted runners, enabling builds to complete significantly faster.
SourceDepot: What is included in the Developer plan?
Developer plan ($20/month) includes 500 Docker build minutes, 2,000 Depot CI minutes, 2,000 GitHub Actions minutes, 25 GB storage, unlimited concurrency, and community support.
SourceDepot: Can I use Depot with my own AWS account?
Yes, Depot Managed allows deployment within customer AWS accounts. This is available to interested customers; contact sales for details.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Acunetix vs Norton 360
- Acunetix vs 1Password
- Acunetix vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Acunetix vs LastPass
- Acunetix vs Burp Suite
- Acunetix vs Veracode
- Acunetix vs Nessus
- Acunetix vs OWASP ZAP
- Acunetix vs Arnica
- Acunetix vs Doppler
- Acunetix vs Aikido
- Acunetix vs NordPass
- Acunetix vs One Identity
- Acunetix vs Ory Kratos
- Acunetix vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- Acunetix vs Tenable Nessus
- Acunetix vs WarpBuild
- Acunetix vs Blacksmith
- Acunetix vs Nixpacks
- Acunetix vs Buildkite
- Acunetix vs GitLab CI/CD
- Acunetix vs Namespace
- Acunetix vs Earthly
- Acunetix vs Nx Cloud
- Acunetix vs Dagger
- Acunetix vs Garden
- Acunetix vs Ansible
- Acunetix vs ConfigCat
- Acunetix vs Avo
- Acunetix vs Azure DevOps
- Acunetix vs Backstage
- Acunetix vs Bitbucket
- Acunetix vs Claude Code
- Acunetix vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Depot vs Norton 360
- Depot vs 1Password
- Depot vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Depot vs LastPass
- Depot vs Burp Suite
- Depot vs Veracode
- Depot vs Nessus
- Depot vs OWASP ZAP
- Depot vs Arnica
- Depot vs Doppler
- Depot vs Aikido
- Depot vs NordPass
- Depot vs One Identity
- Depot vs Ory Kratos
- Depot vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- Depot vs Tenable Nessus
- Depot vs WarpBuild
- Depot vs Blacksmith
- Depot vs Nixpacks
- Depot vs Buildkite
- Depot vs GitLab CI/CD
- Depot vs Namespace
- Depot vs Earthly
- Depot vs Nx Cloud
- Depot vs Dagger
- Depot vs Garden
- Depot vs Ansible
- Depot vs ConfigCat
- Depot vs Avo
- Depot vs Azure DevOps
- Depot vs Backstage
- Depot vs Bitbucket
- Depot vs Claude Code
- Depot vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
