Cybersecurity · head to head
Aikido vs Namespace

Aikido
Cybersecurity
Unified security platform automating vulnerability detection and fixing across development
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Namespace
Developer Tools
The dev platform for the next 100 billion commits
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Aikido free plan includes fair-usage limits on repos and container images; Namespace developer plan is pay-as-you-go only; minimum usage unclear
- They diverge on capability: Aikido covers Static Application Security Testing (SAST), Namespace covers Devboxes.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Aikido and Namespace actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Aikido
- Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
- Software Composition Analysis (SCA)
- AutoFix
- Secrets detection
- Cloud Security Posture Management
- AI-powered penetration testing
- Device protection
- False positive reduction
Only in Namespace
- Devboxes
- GitHub Actions runners
- Docker builds
- Cross-invocation caching
- NVMe storage
- High-speed networking
- Multiple OS support
- Bazel and Turborepo support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Aikido
- Developer-friendly security integrated into PR workflowsnot Namespace
- Automated vulnerability remediation with context-aware alertsnot Namespace
- Consolidation of fragmented security tools across development lifecyclenot Namespace
- Cloud infrastructure security posture monitoringnot Namespace
- Supply chain attack prevention and malware detectionnot Namespace
Namespace
- Providing AI coding agents with cloud-based development environmentsnot Aikido
- Accelerating CI builds with faster GitHub Actions runnersnot Aikido
- Distributing builds across teams with managed infrastructurenot Aikido
- Scaling development velocity for monorepo organizationsnot Aikido
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Aikido
- Free plan includes fair-usage limits on repos and container images
- Pricing increases significantly with user and repository scale
- Advanced features like penetration testing and VM scanning limited to higher tiers
- Device protection limited to Development environments only
- Requires multiple plan tiers for full platform coverage
Namespace
- Developer plan is pay-as-you-go only; minimum usage unclear
- Team plan $100/mo is competitive but usage limits may be tight
- Devbox pricing separate at $0.004/minute could add up quickly
- Enterprise plan requires custom sales conversation
Pricing, plan by plan
Aikido
Free- DeveloperFree
- Up to 2 users
- Dependency scanning (SCA)
- SAST and AI SAST
- Pro$600/month
- Up to 10 users
- All Basic features
- On-premise scanning
- Advanced$600/month
- Up to 10 users
- All Pro features
- Broker for internal apps
- Enterprise$null/custom
- Custom pricing for tailored modules
- Dedicated account management
- Custom SLAs
Namespace
Free- DeveloperFree
- Pay-as-you-go
- On-demand compute
- Docker builds
- Team$100/month
- 100,000 unit minutes
- 1,000 Docker builds
- Everything in Developer
- Business$250/month
- 250,000 unit minutes
- 2,500 Docker builds
- Everything in Team
- Enterprise$undefined/custom
- Custom compute/Docker build limits
- Audit log export
- Enterprise SSO
Which should you pick?
Choose Aikido if
- You need static application security testing (sast).
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, CI/CD, IDE.
- You also want software composition analysis (sca).
Choose Namespace if
- You need devboxes.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud, Mac, Windows, Linux.
- You also want github actions runners.
Questions people ask
- Is Aikido or Namespace better?
- Neither clearly leads. Aikido starts at Free and Namespace at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Aikido or Namespace?
- Aikido starts at Free and Namespace at Free.
- Does Aikido or Namespace run on more platforms?
- Aikido runs on Web, CI/CD, IDE. Namespace runs on Cloud, Mac, Windows, Linux.
- Can I use Aikido for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Aikido best used for?
- Aikido is most often used for developer-friendly security integrated into pr workflows, automated vulnerability remediation with context-aware alerts, consolidation of fragmented security tools across development lifecycle, cloud infrastructure security posture monitoring. Of those, developer-friendly security integrated into pr workflows and automated vulnerability remediation with context-aware alerts are not what Namespace is typically brought in for.
- What can Aikido do that Namespace cannot?
- Aikido covers Static Application Security Testing (SAST), Software Composition Analysis (SCA), AutoFix, Secrets detection. Namespace covers Devboxes, GitHub Actions runners, Docker builds, Cross-invocation caching.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Aikido: What is included in Aikido's free Developer plan?
The free Developer plan includes up to 2 users with SAST, SCA, secrets detection, cloud scanning, and license risk detection. Fair-usage limits apply: 10 repos, 2 container images, 1 domain, and 1 cloud account.
SourceNamespace: How is compute usage metered on the Developer plan?
Developer plan uses pay-as-you-go billing. Devboxes bill at $0.004 per minute. Storage and caching services have separate usage-based fees. A 30-day free trial is available to test usage patterns.
SourceAikido: What is AutoFix and how does it work?
AutoFix is Aikido's automated vulnerability remediation feature that identifies vulnerabilities and suggests or applies specific code fixes automatically, reducing manual remediation effort.
SourceNamespace: What is the difference between Team and Business plans?
Team ($100/mo) includes 100,000 unit minutes and 1,000 Docker builds with email support. Business ($250/mo) includes 250,000 unit minutes, 2,500 Docker builds, and high concurrency with a dedicated Slack channel.
SourceAikido: How many false positives does Aikido reduce?
Aikido reduces false positives by 99%, using AI-powered context awareness to filter noise and focus on vulnerabilities that present real business risk.
SourceNamespace: Can Namespace support AI coding agents?
Yes, Namespace Devboxes are specifically designed as feature-rich development environments for AI coding agents, with full tooling and performance optimization.
SourceAikido: What integrations does Aikido support?
Aikido integrates with Jira, Linear, Slack, Teams, GitHub, GitLab, and other popular development tools to fit into existing workflows.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Aikido vs Snyk
- Aikido vs Veracode
- Aikido vs Tenable
- Aikido vs Legit Security
- Aikido vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- Aikido vs Qualys VMDR
- Aikido vs Arnica
- Aikido vs Sysdig
- Aikido vs Akeyless
- Aikido vs Infisical
- Aikido vs Tanium
- Aikido vs Doppler
- Aikido vs Passbolt
- Aikido vs Ping Identity
- Aikido vs Proofpoint
- Aikido vs Rapid7 InsightVM
- Aikido vs Recorded Future
- Aikido vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Aikido vs CodeSandbox
- Aikido vs WarpBuild
- Aikido vs Depot
- Aikido vs Blacksmith
- Aikido vs Earthly
- Aikido vs Daytona
- Aikido vs Ansible
- Aikido vs Garden
- Aikido vs ConfigCat
- Aikido vs Nix
- Aikido vs OpsLevel
- Aikido vs StackBlitz
- Aikido vs Steampipe
- Aikido vs Tilt
- Aikido vs Webpack
- Aikido vs Avo
- Namespace vs Snyk
- Namespace vs Veracode
- Namespace vs Tenable
- Namespace vs Legit Security
- Namespace vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- Namespace vs Qualys VMDR
- Namespace vs Arnica
- Namespace vs Sysdig
- Namespace vs Akeyless
- Namespace vs Infisical
- Namespace vs Tanium
- Namespace vs Doppler
- Namespace vs Passbolt
- Namespace vs Ping Identity
- Namespace vs Proofpoint
- Namespace vs Rapid7 InsightVM
- Namespace vs Recorded Future
- Namespace vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Namespace vs CodeSandbox
- Namespace vs WarpBuild
- Namespace vs Depot
- Namespace vs Blacksmith
- Namespace vs Earthly
- Namespace vs Daytona
- Namespace vs Ansible
- Namespace vs Garden
- Namespace vs ConfigCat
- Namespace vs Nix
- Namespace vs OpsLevel
- Namespace vs StackBlitz
- Namespace vs Steampipe
- Namespace vs Tilt
- Namespace vs Webpack
- Namespace vs Avo
