Automation Integration · head to head
Activiti vs Aiven

Activiti
Automation Integration
Apache 2.0 BPMN engine under Hyland, from which Flowable and Camunda were forked
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Activiti the last stable release was 8.2.0 in January 2024, and while release candidate builds continue, a two-year gap between stable versions is a real risk signal for a production dependency.; Aiven the free plan gives 1 VM with 1 CPU, 1 GB RAM and 1 GB storage, and cannot pick a specific cloud or region
- They diverge on capability: Activiti covers BPMN 2.0 engine, Aiven covers Multi-cloud Support.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Activiti and Aiven actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Activiti
- BPMN 2.0 engine
- Activiti Cloud
- Modeler
- Java and REST APIs
- Pluggable persistence
- Identity integration
Only in Aiven
- Multi-cloud Support
- Automated Backups
- Seamless Upgrades
- VPC Peering
- End-to-end Encryption
- Compliance
- Observability
- PostgreSQL
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Activiti
- An Alfresco or Hyland content services deployment where Activiti is already the embedded workflow enginenot Aiven
- A Java application that needs to embed a BPMN engine as a library under a permissive licencenot Aiven
- An organisation that has ruled out Camunda 8 on licence grounds and needs an Apache 2.0 alternativenot Aiven
- Document-centric approval workflows where the process engine sits inside the content management stack rather than beside itnot Aiven
Aiven
- Running managed open source databases without operating themnot Activiti
- Multi-cloud deployment across AWS, Google Cloud, Azure, DigitalOcean, OVH and UpCloudnot Activiti
- Highly available data services with automatic failovernot Activiti
- Prototyping on a small free instance before scaling upnot Activiti
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Activiti
- The last stable release was 8.2.0 in January 2024, and while release candidate builds continue, a two-year gap between stable versions is a real risk signal for a production dependency.
- Both Camunda and Flowable forked away and took large parts of the contributor base with them, so the community, tutorials and third-party tooling around Activiti are much thinner than around either fork.
- Commercial support is only realistically available by buying Hyland Alfresco subscriptions, so there is no way to pay for Activiti support on its own.
- Activiti Cloud imposes a distributed architecture of several Spring Boot services plus Keycloak, which is heavy for teams who simply wanted an embeddable engine.
- Documentation is dated and partly split between old Alfresco sites and Hyland Connect, and the transition between Activiti 6, 7 and 8 architectures makes much of the older material actively misleading.
Aiven
- The free plan gives 1 VM with 1 CPU, 1 GB RAM and 1 GB storage, and cannot pick a specific cloud or region
- Free and Developer tiers have no integrations and no connection pooling
- Connection pooling, database forks and dynamic disk sizing need the Business or Premium plan
- A 99.99 percent uptime SLA starts at the Startup plan from $75 a month
- High availability with automatic failover starts at Business from $180 a month
Pricing, plan by plan
Activiti
Free- ActivitiFree
- Apache 2.0 licence
- Embeddable Java library or Activiti Cloud services
- No usage limits
Aiven
Free- Free TrialFree
- $300 credits
- 30 day trial
- All services
- Startup$19/month
- Single node
- Basic support
- Daily backups
Which should you pick?
Choose Activiti if
- You need bpmn 2.0 engine.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes.
- You also want activiti cloud.
Choose Aiven if
- You need multi-cloud support.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Aws, Azure, Gcp, Do.
- You also want automated backups.
Questions people ask
- Is Activiti or Aiven better?
- Neither clearly leads. Activiti starts at Free and Aiven at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Activiti or Aiven?
- Activiti starts at Free and Aiven at Free.
- Does Activiti or Aiven run on more platforms?
- Activiti runs on Linux, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes. Aiven runs on Web, Aws, Azure, Gcp, Do.
- Can I use Activiti for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Activiti best used for?
- Activiti is most often used for an alfresco or hyland content services deployment where activiti is already the embedded workflow engine, a java application that needs to embed a bpmn engine as a library under a permissive licence, an organisation that has ruled out camunda 8 on licence grounds and needs an apache 2.0 alternative, document-centric approval workflows where the process engine sits inside the content management stack rather than beside it. Of those, an alfresco or hyland content services deployment where activiti is already the embedded workflow engine and a java application that needs to embed a bpmn engine as a library under a permissive licence are not what Aiven is typically brought in for.
- What can Activiti do that Aiven cannot?
- Activiti covers BPMN 2.0 engine, Activiti Cloud, Modeler, Java and REST APIs. Aiven covers Multi-cloud Support, Automated Backups, Seamless Upgrades, VPC Peering.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Activiti: Is Activiti still maintained?
Yes, Hyland continues to publish builds, but the last stable release was 8.2.0 in January 2024.
Aiven: What does Aiven's free tier include and does it have any time limit?
The free tier includes PostgreSQL with 1 VM, 1 CPU, 1 GB RAM, and 1 GB storage with access to limited cloud and region selections. There are no time limitations on the free tier, though Aiven reserves the right to shut down accounts that violate policies or remain unused for extended periods.
SourceActiviti: What is its relationship to Camunda and Flowable?
Both are forks of Activiti: Camunda in 2013 and Flowable in 2016, when core developers left Alfresco.
Aiven: How is Aiven billed and what are the monthly costs for each tier?
Aiven bills services by the hour and invoices monthly, charging only for what you actually run. PostgreSQL pricing starts at 5 dollars per month for Developer, 12 dollars per month for Hobbyist, 75 dollars per month for Startup, 180 dollars per month for Business, and 270 dollars per month for Premium. All paid tiers offer hourly billing options as well.
SourceActiviti: What licence is it?
Apache 2.0, which distinguishes it from Camunda 8’s source-available licence.
Aiven: What backup retention periods are included at different Aiven tiers?
Backup retention increases with tier level: Startup tier provides 2 days of backup retention, Business tier offers 14 days, and Premium tier includes 30 days. Point-in-time restore is available on all paid tiers.
SourceActiviti: Should I choose Activiti for a new project?
Only if the Apache licence or an existing Alfresco deployment is decisive. Flowable and Camunda have far larger ecosystems.
Aiven: Is high availability included in Aiven pricing or charged separately?
High availability, backups, and routine maintenance are all included in the tier costs with no separate charges. The Business tier includes 2 VMs with automatic failover, and Premium includes 3 VMs with a second standby node.
SourceAiven: Does Aiven offer a trial period to test premium features?
Aiven offers a 30-day free trial to access premium features beyond what the free plan provides.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Activiti vs n8n
- Activiti vs Temporal
- Activiti vs Flowable
- Activiti vs jBPM
- Activiti vs Camunda
- Activiti vs Nango
- Activiti vs Kogito
- Activiti vs Airbyte
- Activiti vs Windmill
- Activiti vs Meltano
- Activiti vs Zapier
- Activiti vs Microsoft Power Automate
- Activiti vs Census
- Activiti vs Decodable
- Activiti vs Dify
- Activiti vs Flowise
- Activiti vs PostgreSQL
- Activiti vs Instaclustr
- Activiti vs Amazon Aurora
- Activiti vs Cockroach Labs
- Activiti vs Airtable
- Activiti vs Google Cloud SQL
- Activiti vs Apache Kafka
- Activiti vs RabbitMQ
- Activiti vs Azure SQL
- Activiti vs MariaDB
- Activiti vs LanceDB
- Activiti vs Marqo
- Activiti vs Nile
- Activiti vs Ninox
- Activiti vs Presto
- Activiti vs Privacera
- Activiti vs Amazon RDS
- Activiti vs Apache Flink
- Aiven vs n8n
- Aiven vs Temporal
- Aiven vs Flowable
- Aiven vs jBPM
- Aiven vs Camunda
- Aiven vs Nango
- Aiven vs Kogito
- Aiven vs Airbyte
- Aiven vs Windmill
- Aiven vs Meltano
- Aiven vs Zapier
- Aiven vs Microsoft Power Automate
- Aiven vs Census
- Aiven vs Decodable
- Aiven vs Dify
- Aiven vs Flowise
- Aiven vs PostgreSQL
- Aiven vs Instaclustr
- Aiven vs Amazon Aurora
- Aiven vs Cockroach Labs
- Aiven vs Airtable
- Aiven vs Google Cloud SQL
- Aiven vs Apache Kafka
- Aiven vs RabbitMQ
- Aiven vs Azure SQL
- Aiven vs MariaDB
- Aiven vs LanceDB
- Aiven vs Marqo
- Aiven vs Nile
- Aiven vs Ninox
- Aiven vs Presto
- Aiven vs Privacera
- Aiven vs Amazon RDS
- Aiven vs Apache Flink

