Legal · head to head
Actionstep vs Secure Privacy

Actionstep
Legal
Configurable legal practice and accounting management platform sold as two separate products, priced per user with no published rate
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Secure Privacy
Legal
Consent management and website privacy compliance priced per domain by monthly consent volume
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Secure Privacy has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Actionstep no pricing is published beyond a rough $60 a month starting figure; real cost including implementation and add-ons requires a sales quote and can rise substantially, as one documented case showed a fourfold increase within a year.; Secure Privacy consent allowances are the real constraint and they are per domain, so a high traffic site on the Business tier can burn through 50,000 consents well before month end and be pushed to a tier that costs more than four times as much.
- They diverge on capability: Actionstep covers Configurable workflows, Secure Privacy covers Cookie scanning.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Actionstep and Secure Privacy actually diverge.
| Attribute | Actionstep | Secure Privacy |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | Per user per month | Per domain per month by consent volume |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android | Web |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Legal).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Actionstep
- Configurable workflows
- Legal Accounting
- Builder
- Capture
- Trace
- Acumen
Only in Secure Privacy
- Cookie scanning
- Automatic cookie blocking
- Legal templates
- Data subject access requests
- IAB TCF 2.3
- Cross-domain consent
- Scan behind login
- Audit logs and SSO
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Actionstep
- A firm whose matter types do not fit standard case management templates and wants to build its own workflow structurenot Secure Privacy
- A US firm needing trust accounting compliance built into the same system as matter managementnot Secure Privacy
- A firm using AI time capture to reduce billing leakage from unrecorded worknot Secure Privacy
- A growing mid-size firm wanting embedded analytics on matter profitability without exporting to a separate BI toolnot Secure Privacy
Secure Privacy
- A mid-sized ecommerce site that wants published pricing it can budget against rather than an enterprise quote cyclenot Actionstep
- An agency running consent across many client domains that needs branding removed and per-domain billingnot Actionstep
- A company that needs both a consent banner and maintained privacy and cookie policy templates without retaining a law firmnot Actionstep
- A business receiving occasional deletion and access requests that wants them tracked in the same tool rather than in a shared inboxnot Actionstep
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Actionstep
- No pricing is published beyond a rough $60 a month starting figure; real cost including implementation and add-ons requires a sales quote and can rise substantially, as one documented case showed a fourfold increase within a year.
- The configurability that is the main selling point means implementation is a genuine project requiring firm time to design workflows, not a same-day signup like more templated competitors.
- Legal Accounting is sold as a separate North America-only product, so international firms cannot get the full accounting feature set through the same purchase.
- Reviewer base skews heavily toward small firms, and Actionstep itself is candid that most of its reviews come from small businesses, which is a signal about where the product is proven at scale.
- Add-on modules (Builder, Capture, Trace, Acumen) are each additional cost, so a firm comparing Actionstep to an all-in-one competitor needs to price in modules separately to get a fair comparison.
Secure Privacy
- Consent allowances are the real constraint and they are per domain, so a high traffic site on the Business tier can burn through 50,000 consents well before month end and be pushed to a tier that costs more than four times as much.
- Billing is per domain, which makes multi-brand organisations and agencies pay linearly with domain count even when the configuration is identical across all of them.
- There is no data discovery or records of processing at enterprise depth, so it documents website consent rather than a privacy programme, and organisations facing a regulator will still need something more.
- Automatic cookie blocking is not available on the free tier, so the free plan cannot deliver the compliance behaviour that is the reason to install a consent tool in the first place.
- Single sign-on and audit logs appear only on the 249 dollar Advanced tier, which puts basic enterprise access control behind a per-domain price that is punishing for anyone with more than a couple of sites.
Pricing, plan by plan
Actionstep
On request- Practice Management$undefined/month
- Starts around $60 per user per month, quote required for exact rate
- Implementation fees charged separately
- Priced per user, varies by region (US, UK, AU, NZ, CAD)
- Legal Accounting$undefined/month
- North America only
- Sold separately from or combined with Practice Management
- Add-on modules (Builder, Capture, Trace, Acumen) priced separately
Secure Privacy
Free- FreeFree
- Up to 10 domains
- 500 consents per month
- 1 legal template
- Small$15/month
- Per domain
- Unlimited domains
- 5,000 consents per month
- Business$59/month
- Per domain
- 50,000 consents per month
- Over 40 legal templates
- Advanced$249/month
- Per domain
- 5 million consents per month
- Audit logs
Which should you pick?
Choose Actionstep if
- You need configurable workflows.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want legal accounting.
Choose Secure Privacy if
- You need cookie scanning.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want automatic cookie blocking.
Questions people ask
- Is Actionstep or Secure Privacy better?
- Neither clearly leads. Actionstep starts at On request and Secure Privacy at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Actionstep or Secure Privacy?
- Secure Privacy has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Actionstep and Free for Secure Privacy.
- Does Actionstep or Secure Privacy run on more platforms?
- Actionstep runs on Web, iOS, Android. Secure Privacy runs on Web.
- Can I use Secure Privacy for free?
- Yes. Secure Privacy has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Actionstep starts at On request.
- What is Actionstep best used for?
- Actionstep is most often used for a firm whose matter types do not fit standard case management templates and wants to build its own workflow structure, a us firm needing trust accounting compliance built into the same system as matter management, a firm using ai time capture to reduce billing leakage from unrecorded work, a growing mid-size firm wanting embedded analytics on matter profitability without exporting to a separate bi tool. Of those, a firm whose matter types do not fit standard case management templates and wants to build its own workflow structure and a us firm needing trust accounting compliance built into the same system as matter management are not what Secure Privacy is typically brought in for.
- What can Actionstep do that Secure Privacy cannot?
- Actionstep covers Configurable workflows, Legal Accounting, Builder, Capture. Secure Privacy covers Cookie scanning, Automatic cookie blocking, Legal templates, Data subject access requests.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Actionstep: Is Actionstep pricing published?
No. The pricing page gives no rate card; you must request a quote, and cost is per user plus implementation fees, varying by region.
Secure Privacy: What is a consent, for billing purposes?
A recorded consent decision from a visitor. Because returning visitors can re-consent, consent counts do not map cleanly to unique visitors, and this is the most common source of unexpected tier upgrades.
Actionstep: Can I buy just the accounting product?
Yes, Legal Accounting is sold separately from Practice Management, though it is limited to North America.
Secure Privacy: Is the free plan usable?
For evaluation only. It caps at 500 consents a month and does not include automatic cookie blocking.
Actionstep: Does it work like Clio or MyCase out of the box?
Not exactly. Actionstep leans on firm-configured workflows rather than fixed templates, which means more setup but a closer eventual fit to how the firm works.
Secure Privacy: Does it handle data subject requests?
Yes, from the Business tier at 59 US dollars per domain per month. The Small tier does not include it.
Secure Privacy: Can it replace OneTrust?
For website consent and simple request handling, yes. For data discovery, records of processing and vendor risk, no.
Related pages
More on Secure Privacy
Other head to heads
- Actionstep vs MyCase
- Actionstep vs Clio
- Actionstep vs Smokeball
- Actionstep vs CosmoLex
- Actionstep vs Rocket Matter
- Actionstep vs Docketwise
- Actionstep vs Tabs3
- Actionstep vs Filevine
- Actionstep vs Harvey
- Actionstep vs Ironclad
- Actionstep vs iubenda
- Actionstep vs CASEpeer
- Actionstep vs Logikcull
- Actionstep vs Westlaw
- Actionstep vs Cookiebot
- Actionstep vs Didomi
- Actionstep vs Luminance
- Actionstep vs Intapp
- Actionstep vs Litify
- Actionstep vs Spellbook
- Actionstep vs LexisNexis
- Actionstep vs DISCO
- Actionstep vs iManage
- Actionstep vs Litera
- Secure Privacy vs MyCase
- Secure Privacy vs Clio
- Secure Privacy vs Smokeball
- Secure Privacy vs CosmoLex
- Secure Privacy vs Rocket Matter
- Secure Privacy vs Docketwise
- Secure Privacy vs Tabs3
- Secure Privacy vs Filevine
- Secure Privacy vs Harvey
- Secure Privacy vs Ironclad
- Secure Privacy vs iubenda
- Secure Privacy vs CASEpeer
- Secure Privacy vs Logikcull
- Secure Privacy vs Westlaw
- Secure Privacy vs Cookiebot
- Secure Privacy vs Didomi
- Secure Privacy vs Luminance
- Secure Privacy vs Intapp
- Secure Privacy vs Litify
- Secure Privacy vs Spellbook
- Secure Privacy vs LexisNexis
- Secure Privacy vs DISCO
- Secure Privacy vs iManage
- Secure Privacy vs Litera
