APIs · head to head
3scale vs Swan

3scale
APIs
API management platform for designing, securing, and monetizing APIs
- From
- $300/monthly
- Rated
- -

Swan
APIs
European banking-as-a-service platform for embedding accounts, cards and payments into other products
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: 3scale red Hat's managed 3scale services end on 30 June 2027, so anyone adopting the hosted option now is choosing a product with a published end date; Swan its regulatory base and strongest local account coverage are French and European, so companies needing US, UK-post-Brexit-specific, or broader global banking-as-a-service need an additional provider.
- They diverge on capability: 3scale covers API Gateway, Swan covers Embedded business accounts.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which 3scale and Swan actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (APIs).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in 3scale
- API Gateway
- Developer Portal
- API Monetization
- Red Hat OpenShift
- AWS
- Azure
- Kubernetes
- Cloud support
Only in Swan
- Embedded business accounts
- Card issuing
- SEPA payments
- Local account localisation
- ACPR regulation
- Usage-based pricing
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
3scale
- API gateway and lifecycle managementnot Swan
- Rate limiting and traffic control across API consumersnot Swan
- Developer portal and access key managementnot Swan
- Monetising APIs with usage-based plansnot Swan
- Hybrid deployment across on-premises and cloudnot Swan
Swan
- A vertical SaaS platform wanting to embed business bank accounts under its own brandnot 3scale
- A marketplace wanting to issue cards to sellers or partners without becoming a licensed banknot 3scale
- A company wanting SEPA payment initiation embedded directly into its own productnot 3scale
- A European fintech wanting to avoid a six-figure setup fee and long lock-in typical of legacy banking-as-a-service dealsnot 3scale
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
3scale
- Red Hat's managed 3scale services end on 30 June 2027, so anyone adopting the hosted option now is choosing a product with a published end date
- Sold as part of Red Hat middleware rather than standalone, and 3scale.net redirects into redhat.com
- Pricing is not published and a subscription is required for some services
Swan
- Its regulatory base and strongest local account coverage are French and European, so companies needing US, UK-post-Brexit-specific, or broader global banking-as-a-service need an additional provider.
- Pricing is described only philosophically (usage-based, no big setup fee) rather than published as an actual rate card, so a company still needs a sales conversation to get real numbers.
- Embedding banking features into a product is a substantial compliance and design undertaking regardless of the vendor, and Swan handling the licence does not remove a platform's own KYC, AML and customer support obligations for the accounts it offers.
- As a comparatively young, single-country-licensed e-money institution, its balance sheet and regulatory standing carry more concentration risk than a banking-as-a-service offering backed by an established, multi-jurisdiction bank.
- Local account depth is explicitly limited to France, Germany and Spain, so a platform needing native local accounts in other European countries may find coverage thinner than expected.
Pricing, plan by plan
3scale
$300/monthly- Starter$300/monthly
- API gateway
- Developer portal
- Basic analytics
- Professional$750/monthly
- Advanced features
- API monetization
- Enhanced support
- Enterprise$undefined/monthly
- Custom deployment
- Dedicated support
- Premium SLA
Swan
On request- Swan$undefined/month
- Usage-based pricing, no published rate card
- No long-term contract or large setup fee required
- Custom quote based on current, not forecast, usage
Which should you pick?
Choose 3scale if
- You need api gateway.
- You work on Cloud, On-premises, Hybrid.
- You also want developer portal.
Choose Swan if
- You need embedded business accounts.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want card issuing.
Questions people ask
- Is 3scale or Swan better?
- Neither clearly leads. 3scale starts at $300/monthly and Swan at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, 3scale or Swan?
- 3scale starts at $300/monthly and Swan at On request.
- Does 3scale or Swan run on more platforms?
- 3scale runs on Cloud, On-premises, Hybrid. Swan runs on Web, API.
- What is 3scale best used for?
- 3scale is most often used for api gateway and lifecycle management, rate limiting and traffic control across api consumers, developer portal and access key management, monetising apis with usage-based plans. Of those, api gateway and lifecycle management and rate limiting and traffic control across api consumers are not what Swan is typically brought in for.
- What can 3scale do that Swan cannot?
- 3scale covers API Gateway, Developer Portal, API Monetization, Red Hat OpenShift. Swan covers Embedded business accounts, Card issuing, SEPA payments, Local account localisation.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
3scale: Does Red Hat 3scale require a subscription?
Yes. The page states a subscription may be required for some services, though specific subscription details and costs are not published on this page.
SourceSwan: Which countries does Swan offer local accounts in?
France, Germany and Spain specifically, alongside broader SEPA payment coverage.
3scale: Is a trial available for 3scale?
A 'Start a trial' link is mentioned in navigation, but trial duration, included features, and limitations are not specified on this page.
SourceSwan: Is pricing published?
No, Swan describes a usage-based, no-large-setup-fee philosophy but requires a quote for actual numbers.
3scale: When will Red Hat 3scale end support?
Red Hat 3scale API Management maintenance and managed services will end on June 30, 2027. Customers should plan migrations accordingly.
SourceSwan: Who regulates Swan?
France's ACPR (Autorite de Controle Prudentiel et de Resolution), as a licensed e-money institution.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- 3scale vs Sanity
- 3scale vs Appwrite
- 3scale vs Hasura
- 3scale vs PocketBase
- 3scale vs Apigee
- 3scale vs WSO2 API Manager
- 3scale vs Akana
- 3scale vs Boomi API Management
- 3scale vs TIBCO Mashery
- 3scale vs Microsoft Azure API Management
- 3scale vs Kong
- 3scale vs MuleSoft Anypoint
- 3scale vs Paymentology
- 3scale vs Q2 Digital Banking
- 3scale vs Solaris
- 3scale vs Stainless
- 3scale vs Strapi
- 3scale vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- 3scale vs Vodeno
- 3scale vs Trustly
- 3scale vs Yapily
- 3scale vs Unit
- 3scale vs Griffin
- 3scale vs Weavr
- 3scale vs Fintech Farm
- 3scale vs Lithic
- 3scale vs Treasury Prime
- 3scale vs Synctera
- 3scale vs Astra
- 3scale vs Treblle
- 3scale vs Tribe Payments
- 3scale vs Tuum
- Swan vs Sanity
- Swan vs Appwrite
- Swan vs Hasura
- Swan vs PocketBase
- Swan vs Apigee
- Swan vs WSO2 API Manager
- Swan vs Akana
- Swan vs Boomi API Management
- Swan vs TIBCO Mashery
- Swan vs Microsoft Azure API Management
- Swan vs Kong
- Swan vs MuleSoft Anypoint
- Swan vs Paymentology
- Swan vs Q2 Digital Banking
- Swan vs Solaris
- Swan vs Stainless
- Swan vs Strapi
- Swan vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Swan vs Vodeno
- Swan vs Trustly
- Swan vs Yapily
- Swan vs Unit
- Swan vs Griffin
- Swan vs Weavr
- Swan vs Fintech Farm
- Swan vs Lithic
- Swan vs Treasury Prime
- Swan vs Synctera
- Swan vs Astra
- Swan vs Treblle
- Swan vs Tribe Payments
- Swan vs Tuum
