Mining · head to head
3DEC vs Imago
The short version
- Each has a real cost: 3DEC pricing is not published; licences are quoted, with subscription and perpetual options; Imago no pricing amounts published on vendor website; specific tier costs must be obtained by contacting sales
- They diverge on capability: 3DEC covers 3D distinct element analysis, Imago covers Geological database.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which 3DEC and Imago actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (subscription), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Mining).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in 3DEC
- 3D distinct element analysis
- Block motion tracking
- Contact detection
- Support design
- Dynamic simulation
- FLAC3D
- Python
- Linux support
Only in Imago
- Geological database
- Drill hole management
- Sample tracking
- Data validation
- Reporting tools
- Excel
- GIS systems
Both cover
- Leapfrog
- Vulcan
- Windows support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
3DEC
- Three-dimensional analysis of jointed rock and discontinuous materialsnot Imago
- Slope stability and pillar analysis for miningnot Imago
- Blast and earthquake dynamic analysisnot Imago
- Groundwater flow through fractured rocknot Imago
- Coupled thermal, mechanical and hydraulic modelling for geothermal, CO2 sequestration and nuclear wastenot Imago
Imago
- Digitising and managing drill core photographynot 3DEC
- Linking core imagery to geological logging datanot 3DEC
- Streaming high-resolution core imagery into Leapfrog modelsnot 3DEC
- Sharing geoscientific imagery across a distributed exploration teamnot 3DEC
- Capturing core images in the field with the mobile appnot 3DEC
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
3DEC
- Pricing is not published; licences are quoted, with subscription and perpetual options
- A specialist geomechanical tool rather than general purpose simulation, so it assumes the user is a rock mechanics engineer
Imago
- No pricing amounts published on vendor website; specific tier costs must be obtained by contacting sales
- Tiers are designed for mining operations (each mine site requires separate subscription)
Pricing, plan by plan
3DEC
On request- 3DEC Professional$25000/year
- 3D distinct element analysis
- Block-to-block interaction
- Support installation modeling
Imago
On request- Imago Professional$6500/year
- Database management
- Drill hole tracking
- Sample management
Which should you pick?
Choose 3DEC if
- You need 3d distinct element analysis.
- You work on Windows, Linux.
- You also want block motion tracking.
Choose Imago if
- You need geological database.
- You work on Windows.
- You also want drill hole management.
Questions people ask
- Is 3DEC or Imago better?
- Neither clearly leads. 3DEC starts at On request and Imago at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, 3DEC or Imago?
- 3DEC starts at On request and Imago at On request.
- Does 3DEC or Imago run on more platforms?
- 3DEC runs on Windows, Linux. Imago runs on Windows.
- What is 3DEC best used for?
- 3DEC is most often used for three-dimensional analysis of jointed rock and discontinuous materials, slope stability and pillar analysis for mining, blast and earthquake dynamic analysis, groundwater flow through fractured rock. Of those, three-dimensional analysis of jointed rock and discontinuous materials and slope stability and pillar analysis for mining are not what Imago is typically brought in for.
- What can 3DEC do that Imago cannot?
- 3DEC covers 3D distinct element analysis, Block motion tracking, Contact detection, Support design. Imago covers Geological database, Drill hole management, Sample tracking, Data validation. Both handle Leapfrog, Vulcan, Windows support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
3DEC: Does 3DEC offer a free trial before purchasing?
Yes, 3DEC provides a free demo download available via the REQUEST DEMO button on their website. However, the specific trial period length is not stated on the product page.
SourceImago: What are the Imago subscription tiers?
Imago offers three subscription tiers: Standard (single workspace, unlimited users, 3TB storage), Enterprise (multiple workspaces, unlimited users, 6TB shared storage, SSO and user group management), and Junior (single workspace, unlimited users, 500GB storage, for non-producing companies or academic licensing only). All tiers are contracted on 12-month agreements.
Source3DEC: What licensing models does 3DEC support?
3DEC offers both subscription-based licenses (annual) and perpetual licenses. Subscription licenses are available through their FastSpring store with annual subscription terms.
SourceImago: What add-on options are available for Imago?
Imago offers add-on subscriptions including Chip Shot (RC chip tray capture control), Mobile Capture X (smartphone field capture workflows), and Storage (additional capacity in 1TB increments). Each additional mine site requires a separate Imago subscription.
Source3DEC: How is 3DEC pricing determined?
3DEC uses a quote-based pricing model rather than publishing fixed rates. Customers can request a quote through the website or purchase through their software store, with pricing customized based on specific needs.
Source3DEC: What support resources are included with 3DEC?
3DEC includes documentation, tutorials, forum access, FAQs, applied examples, and training courses. Support appears to be included with purchases rather than sold separately.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- 3DEC vs Deswik Suite
- 3DEC vs Leapfrog Geo
- 3DEC vs Caterpillar MineStar
- 3DEC vs Dassault Systemes GEOVIA
- 3DEC vs OptiMine
- 3DEC vs Maptek I-Site
- 3DEC vs Leica Geosystems Mining
- 3DEC vs PLAXIS
- 3DEC vs RS2
- 3DEC vs GEOVIA GEMS
- 3DEC vs Wenco
- 3DEC vs Snowden Supervisor
- 3DEC vs Vulcan Geological Modelling
- 3DEC vs Seequent Central
- 3DEC vs GeoStudio
- 3DEC vs Whittle
- 3DEC vs CorePlan
- 3DEC vs Infomine Mining Intelligence
- 3DEC vs Maxwell Datacloud
- 3DEC vs acQuire GIM Suite
- 3DEC vs Cority EHS
- 3DEC vs MinePlan
- 3DEC vs Micromine
- 3DEC vs Enablon EHS
- 3DEC vs MineRP
- 3DEC vs MineSched
- 3DEC vs MineSight
- 3DEC vs Minviro
- 3DEC vs PCBC
- Imago vs Deswik Suite
- Imago vs Leapfrog Geo
- Imago vs Caterpillar MineStar
- Imago vs Dassault Systemes GEOVIA
- Imago vs OptiMine
- Imago vs Maptek I-Site
- Imago vs Leica Geosystems Mining
- Imago vs PLAXIS
- Imago vs RS2
- Imago vs GEOVIA GEMS
- Imago vs Wenco
- Imago vs Snowden Supervisor
- Imago vs Vulcan Geological Modelling
- Imago vs Seequent Central
- Imago vs GeoStudio
- Imago vs Whittle
- Imago vs CorePlan
- Imago vs Infomine Mining Intelligence
- Imago vs Maxwell Datacloud
- Imago vs acQuire GIM Suite
- Imago vs Cority EHS
- Imago vs MinePlan
- Imago vs Micromine
- Imago vs Enablon EHS
- Imago vs MineRP
- Imago vs MineSched
- Imago vs MineSight
- Imago vs Minviro
- Imago vs PCBC

