
Acunetix
Web application security testing made easy
- Windows
- macOS
- Web
- +1
4 alternatives · 1 question answered
The directory
16 products matching your filters. Each one described on the same fields, so two tools can be read against each other rather than against their own marketing.
Showing 1–16 of 16

Web application security testing made easy
4 alternatives · 1 question answered

The leading toolkit for web security testing
4 alternatives · 3 questions answered

Agentic trust management with compliance automation.
4 alternatives · 3 questions answered

Consumer VPN registered in the British Virgin Islands, owned by Kape Technologies since 2021, with repeated third-party audits.
4 alternatives · 5 questions answered

Enterprise SIEM licensed by events per second, whose cloud business IBM sold to Palo Alto Networks in 2024.
4 alternatives · 5 questions answered

Unified identity and device management for hybrid workforce.
4 alternatives · 3 questions answered

AI-powered SIEM platform for modern security operations
4 alternatives · 2 questions answered

The most trusted vulnerability assessment solution
4 alternatives · 3 questions answered

Consumer and business VPN from Nord Security, registered in Panama, with repeated third-party no-logs audits.
4 alternatives · 5 questions answered

Cloud-native application protection platform
4 alternatives · 3 questions answered

Cloud-delivered vulnerability management licensed per asset, using scanner appliances and a lightweight agent.
4 alternatives · 5 questions answered

Intelligence-driven cybersecurity
4 alternatives · 4 questions answered

Advanced endpoint protection with deep learning
4 alternatives · 3 questions answered

The platform for operational intelligence
4 alternatives · 2 questions answered

Compliance automation platform for SOC 2, ISO 27001 and similar frameworks.
4 alternatives · 3 questions answered
Cloud-delivered endpoint protection and EDR, now owned by Broadcom and positioned alongside Symantec.
4 alternatives · 5 questions answered
Browse another way
How this works
Pricing, platforms and feature lists are taken from each vendor's own pages. Limitations, answered questions and alternatives are researched separately and carry a source URL on the page that states them. Every product is described on the same fields, so two tools can be read against each other rather than against their own marketing.
Because we did not collect any. Softwr hosts no reviews, and a rating aggregated from somewhere else is not ours to publish as though it were an assessment we made. What is shown instead is what a tool costs, where it runs, and what it is concretely bad at.
A researcher proposes them, then two independent reviewers judge one question each: would a buyer evaluating this product seriously consider that one instead. 225 of 1,841 candidates failed and were deleted, including a font inspector matched to a dark mode extension. Only pairings that survived both rounds are published.
Not to be listed. A vendor can buy a place in the results on the home page, on a category listing or on the catalogue, and where they do the result carries a Sponsored label. Everything not carrying that label is ordered on the same criteria as everything else, and a paid place never changes where an unpaid one lands: the editorial order flows around it. Where a link earns a commission that is disclosed on the page carrying it.
Prices and plan limits move without notice, so treat anything with a number on it as a starting point and check the vendor before you buy. Where a claim could go stale it carries the source it came from, which is the fastest way to tell.
Something missing here?
Anyone can submit a tool. A person reads every submission, checks the pricing against the vendor’s own page, and nothing is published until it passes.