Sakaivs
Moodle


Moodle: If you want open source with a much larger plugin ecosystem, a bigger hiring pool and an established commercial partner network.

Open source learning management system governed by the Apereo Foundation
As of 31 August 2026, Sakai is free to use. Sakai is a Java-based LMS used mainly by universities that want to own their teaching platform rather than licence it, and it is still cutting releases: version 25. Softwr lists it under LMS. Sakai is made by Apereo Foundation, available on Web, Linux, iOS, Android.
Overview
Sakai is a learning management system for higher education, covering course sites, assignments, tests and quizzes, gradebook, forums, lessons, resources, rosters and plagiarism integration. It is written in Java, runs on Tomcat against MySQL, MariaDB or Oracle, and is released under the Educational Community Licence. Governance sits with the Apereo Foundation, a member organisation of universities rather than a company, and development happens in the open on GitHub with commits through 2026. The distinguishing commercial fact is who cannot buy it out from under you. Sakai has no vendor to be acquired, no investor demanding growth and no licence to reprice. For a university that has watched Blackboard change hands and Instructure be taken private, that is a governance argument rather than a feature argument, and it is the one Sakai wins on. The counterpart is that no single organisation is accountable for it either. If a module you rely on loses its maintaining institution, the fix is your engineers or a paid partner, not a support ticket. Commercial support and hosting are available from a small set of affiliates including Longsight, which is how most non-technical adopters run it. The institutions that choose it are typically universities with an existing Java estate, a systems team and a policy preference for owning student data on their own infrastructure, often in Spain, Latin America, South Africa and parts of the US higher education sector. The trade-off is interface age and ecosystem size. Sakai does the core teaching workflow properly, but the third-party tool market builds for Canvas first, and a university choosing Sakai should expect to do LTI integration work that a Canvas customer gets prebuilt.
The honest half
Concrete and checkable, so you can decide whether any of them matter to you. This is the half of a review a vendor will not write about Sakai.
Cross-shopped
Each pairing was judged by two reviewers asking whether a buyer would genuinely weigh the two against each other. The ones that failed were deleted rather than published.


Moodle: If you want open source with a much larger plugin ecosystem, a bigger hiring pool and an established commercial partner network.


Canvas: If you would rather buy a hosted commercial LMS with the widest third-party tool support and accept the licence and the vendor risk.


Open edX: If your priority is large-scale online course delivery to open cohorts rather than running credit-bearing university modules.
Pricing
Taken from the vendor's own pricing page. Prices move, so check before you buy.
Sakai
Free
Commercial hosting and support
On request
Capabilities
Course sites
Per-course workspaces with configurable tool sets rather than a fixed template
Tests and Quizzes
Assessment authoring with question pools, randomisation and timed delivery
Gradebook
Weighted categories, letter grade schemas and per-item release control
Lessons
Sequenced content pages combining resources, assignments and conditional release
Assignments
Submission, group assignments, rubrics and plagiarism service integration
Forums and messaging
Threaded discussion, private messaging and per-group boards
LTI support
Standards-based integration of external teaching tools including LTI Advantage
Self-hosting
Deployable on your own infrastructure with student data never leaving your control
Answered, with sources
Each answer names the page it came from, so you can check it rather than take our word for it.
Yes. Version 25.0 shipped in 2025, 25.1 followed in November 2025, and further maintenance releases in the 25 line are planned, with commits continuing through 2026.
No company does. Governance sits with the Apereo Foundation, a membership organisation of institutions, and the code is under the Educational Community Licence.
The software is free. The cost is Java hosting and staff, or a commercial hosting agreement with an Apereo affiliate such as Longsight, typically quoted by student headcount.
Moodle has a far larger plugin ecosystem and installed base; Sakai has a cleaner assessment and gradebook model and is more common in research-intensive universities. Moodle is easier to hire for.
Yes, but course content export fidelity through Common Cartridge is imperfect, so budget for manual rebuilding of assessments as you would leaving any LMS.
Keep looking
Open source French-language learning platform, now developed as Claroline Connect
Open source learning management system with no licence fee and a Latin American and francophone user base
Open source learning, performance and collaboration platform derived from Moodle and sold through partners
One learning platform codebase serving schools, universities and businesses with built-in AI course generation
Multi-portal learning management for training employees, customers and partners from one instance
Customer education platform that treats training completion as a commercial signal in the CRM
Lecture capture, video management, polling and exam authoring for universities
External learning platform for companies that sell training to customers and partners as a product
Learning management with interactive content authoring built in rather than bought separately
Learning experience platform that indexes skills and third-party content rather than hosting courses
WordPress plugin that turns a site you already own into a course platform with no revenue share
Lecture capture, video management, polling and exam authoring for universities
Softwr does not host reviews and shows no star rating for Sakai, because a rating we did not collect is not ours to publish. What is here is the pricing and platform detail from the vendor’s own pages, limitations we could state concretely, and alternatives a reviewer confirmed people weigh against it. Tell us if any of it is wrong.
What people switch to, and what they give up
Every tier, and where the cost actually lands
Put it head to head with anything we hold
Its rating, and an embed for your own site
Asynchronous training video with AI avatars, quizzes and a searchable knowledge library
Per creator per monthExternal learning platform for companies that sell training to customers and partners as a product
quoteLearning management with interactive content authoring built in rather than bought separately
quoteOpen source learning, performance and collaboration platform derived from Moodle and sold through partners
quoteCustomer education platform that treats training completion as a commercial signal in the CRM
quoteWordPress plugin that turns a site you already own into a course platform with no revenue share
Per site per yearOne learning platform codebase serving schools, universities and businesses with built-in AI course generation
quote