Proto.iovs
ProtoPie


ProtoPie: If you want conditional prototyping with a lighter learning curve and sensor input

Hosted high-fidelity prototyping with device preview and no code
As of 31 August 2026, Proto.io's pricing is not published; the vendor quotes on request. One of the few prototyping tools from the pre-Figma era still trading, and it outlasted InVision, which shut its design collaboration service at the end of 2024. Softwr lists it under Design. Proto.io is available on Web, iOS, Android.
Overview
Proto.io is a hosted prototyping tool for building clickable, animated, high-fidelity prototypes of mobile and web interfaces. Screens are assembled from imported artwork or built in the editor, and behaviour is defined with layer-level events, conditions, variables and timeline animation. Prototypes preview on real devices through a companion app and are shared as links for testing. The commercial context matters more than the feature list. This category has been hollowed out: Adobe XD was discontinued, InVision closed its design collaboration service at the end of 2024, and Figma absorbed most casual prototyping. Proto.io survived by staying in the part of the market Figma does not serve, prototypes with conditional logic and state that behave like the real product during user testing rather than a click-through of static frames. Buyers are research and UX teams who need a prototype convincing enough that usability findings are trustworthy, and agencies validating concepts before development. The trade-off is duplication: design lives in Figma or Sketch, interaction lives in Proto.io, and every design change has to be carried across by hand.
The honest half
Concrete and checkable, so you can decide whether any of them matter to you. This is the half of a review a vendor will not write about Proto.io.
Cross-shopped
Each pairing was judged by two reviewers asking whether a buyer would genuinely weigh the two against each other. The ones that failed were deleted rather than published.


ProtoPie: If you want conditional prototyping with a lighter learning curve and sensor input


Figma: If click-through prototypes of static screens are sufficient


InVision: Only for historical context; its design collaboration service closed at the end of 2024
Pricing
Taken from the vendor's own pricing page. Prices move, so check before you buy.
Freelancer
On request
Startup
On request
Agency
On request
Corporate
On request
Capabilities
Event and condition system
Layer-level triggers with conditional logic and variables
Timeline animation
Keyframed transitions and micro-interactions per screen
Device preview
Runs the prototype on a physical phone or tablet through a companion app
Component library
Reusable interactive components shared across a project
User testing integration
Records sessions against the prototype for research
Design import
Brings in Figma, Sketch and Photoshop artwork as layered screens
Answered, with sources
Each answer names the page it came from, so you can check it rather than take our word for it.
No. It has no design system or file-handoff role. It sits alongside Figma for the prototypes Figma cannot express.
They stop being accessible unless you have exported them, and offline export is restricted to higher plans, so plan archiving before you cancel.
If your work is usability research on conditional flows, yes. If you need click-through demos of static screens, Figma already does that at no extra cost.
Keep looking
Free macOS prototyping tool built by and for Meta design teams
Prototyping and specification tool for conditional, data-driven interfaces
Build with the power of code — without writing any
Low-fidelity wireframing that keeps focus on structure and content
Authoring, hosting and delivery platform for Lottie vector animations
A creative AI platform for image, video, and audio generation, formerly Freepik AI
Free macOS prototyping tool built by and for Meta design teams
Softwr does not host reviews and shows no star rating for Proto.io, because a rating we did not collect is not ours to publish. What is here is the pricing and platform detail from the vendor’s own pages, limitations we could state concretely, and alternatives a reviewer confirmed people weigh against it. Tell us if any of it is wrong.
What people switch to, and what they give up
Every tier, and where the cost actually lands
Put it head to head with anything we hold
Its rating, and an embed for your own site
Prototyping and specification tool for conditional, data-driven interfaces
Per user per month