Nolocovs
Softr


Softr: A larger template library and a faster route to a first working portal over Airtable

Client portals and internal tools built over data you already have
As of 30 August 2026, Noloco's pricing is not published; the vendor quotes on request. A builder for portals, internal tools and lightweight CRMs on top of Airtable, PostgreSQL, MySQL, Google Sheets or HubSpot, with per-record permissions as its main asset. Softwr lists it under No-Code. Noloco is available on Web.
Overview
Noloco turns an existing database or spreadsheet into a permissioned web application: a client portal, an internal tool, a partner dashboard or a simple CRM. It connects to Airtable, PostgreSQL, MySQL, Google Sheets and HubSpot, or its own tables, and then adds what those sources lack: role-based and row-level permissions, a navigable interface, forms, workflows, custom domains and white labelling. The reason to choose it over a general app builder is the permissions model. Portal projects almost always fail on the same requirement, that each client sees only their own records and staff see everything, and Noloco treats that as a first-class configuration rather than something you assemble from filters and hope. That is genuinely useful and it is also the boundary of the product: Noloco does not fix the underlying source, so Airtable record ceilings, API rate limits and query performance pass straight through to the application your customers use. Buyers are agencies delivering client portals, operations teams that have outgrown sharing an Airtable base, and small companies wanting a customer-facing layer without a development project. The trade-offs are pricing shape and competition. A portal is by nature many light users, and user-based pricing bands move quickly when each client contact needs a login. Meanwhile Airtable ships its own interface layer and Softr targets the same buyer, so this is a small vendor in a crowded space.
The honest half
Concrete and checkable, so you can decide whether any of them matter to you. This is the half of a review a vendor will not write about Noloco.
Cross-shopped
Each pairing was judged by two reviewers asking whether a buyer would genuinely weigh the two against each other. The ones that failed were deleted rather than published.


Softr: A larger template library and a faster route to a first working portal over Airtable


Glide: Better where the app is mostly views over a spreadsheet and mobile use matters


AppSheet: Worth comparing if the organisation is on Google Workspace and needs offline-capable mobile data capture
Pricing
Taken from the vendor's own pricing page. Prices move, so check before you buy.
Noloco
On request
Capabilities
Row-level permissions
Rules that restrict each user to their own records without hand-built filters
Multiple data sources
Airtable, PostgreSQL, MySQL, Google Sheets, HubSpot or built-in tables
Client portals
Branded, custom-domain portals with separate internal and external user experiences
Workflows
Triggered actions, notifications and record updates without external automation for simple cases
Forms and record detail pages
Structured data entry with validation, file uploads and conditional fields
White labelling
Custom domain, logo and colours so the portal reads as the client brand
Answered, with sources
Each answer names the page it came from, so you can check it rather than take our word for it.
No. Airtable is the most common source but PostgreSQL, MySQL, Google Sheets, HubSpot and built-in Noloco tables all work.
Client and internal users are counted differently, but they are still counted, so a portal with many client logins moves you up the plan bands. Check the current band definitions before committing to a per-client model.
Both build portals over existing data. Noloco leans harder on permissions and multiple database sources; Softr leans on templates, speed to a first version and a bigger ecosystem.
Keep looking
No-code platform for building web apps, client portals and directories from data
Permissioned portals over data that stays in Airtable, Salesforce or Postgres
AI software development platform for building internal business apps from a spreadsheet, a prompt…
AI-assisted platform for building internal tools and business apps
Open-source low-code platform for building internal tools and business apps
Two-way real-time sync between no-code databases and SaaS tools
No-code database app platform charging by data records and DataPages rather than by user seats
Low-code app builder priced per user per month, bundled into the wider Zoho ecosystem
Low-code process automation platform priced per user, per app, per month, with tier limits on data and AI volume
Front-end builder for applications whose data already lives somewhere else
Apache-licensed open source low-code platform, formerly Crust, positioned against Salesforce
No-code backend with a visual workflow engine, used behind other tools rather than instead of them
Visual builder for React Native apps that exports the source code you keep
Full-stack web app builder with its own Postgres database and a GraphQL API over your tables
Permissioned portals over data that stays in Airtable, Salesforce or Postgres
Softwr does not host reviews and shows no star rating for Noloco, because a rating we did not collect is not ours to publish. What is here is the pricing and platform detail from the vendor’s own pages, limitations we could state concretely, and alternatives a reviewer confirmed people weigh against it. Tell us if any of it is wrong.
What people switch to, and what they give up
Every tier, and where the cost actually lands
Put it head to head with anything we hold
Its rating, and an embed for your own site
No-code application platform with published per-user pricing and enforced minimum seat counts
Per user per month, billed annually, with an enforced minimum seat count per tierEnterprise low-code platform priced by application complexity units, not just users
Application Object consumption plus internal and external user packsNo-code, drag-and-drop mobile app builder priced by AI tokens and project counts
Per month, tiered by AI token allowance and project countLow-code app builder priced per user per month, bundled into the wider Zoho ecosystem
Per user per month, billed annuallyNo-code database app platform charging by data records and DataPages rather than by user seats
Flat monthly fee by data record volume and DataPage count, unlimited users includedSiemens-owned low-code platform priced by app count, with cloud infrastructure billed separately
Per application tier (One App vs Unlimited Apps), cloud infrastructure billed separatelyLow-code process automation platform priced per user, per app, per month, with tier limits on data and AI volume
Per user, per app, per month, escalating across Standard, Advanced and Premium tiers