Softwr
Noloco logo

Noloco

Client portals and internal tools built over data you already have

As of 30 August 2026, Noloco's pricing is not published; the vendor quotes on request. A builder for portals, internal tools and lightweight CRMs on top of Airtable, PostgreSQL, MySQL, Google Sheets or HubSpot, with per-record permissions as its main asset. Softwr lists it under No-Code. Noloco is available on Web.

Overview

What Noloco does

Noloco turns an existing database or spreadsheet into a permissioned web application: a client portal, an internal tool, a partner dashboard or a simple CRM. It connects to Airtable, PostgreSQL, MySQL, Google Sheets and HubSpot, or its own tables, and then adds what those sources lack: role-based and row-level permissions, a navigable interface, forms, workflows, custom domains and white labelling. The reason to choose it over a general app builder is the permissions model. Portal projects almost always fail on the same requirement, that each client sees only their own records and staff see everything, and Noloco treats that as a first-class configuration rather than something you assemble from filters and hope. That is genuinely useful and it is also the boundary of the product: Noloco does not fix the underlying source, so Airtable record ceilings, API rate limits and query performance pass straight through to the application your customers use. Buyers are agencies delivering client portals, operations teams that have outgrown sharing an Airtable base, and small companies wanting a customer-facing layer without a development project. The trade-offs are pricing shape and competition. A portal is by nature many light users, and user-based pricing bands move quickly when each client contact needs a login. Meanwhile Airtable ships its own interface layer and Softr targets the same buyer, so this is a small vendor in a crowded space.

What people use it for

  • Giving clients a branded portal onto their own records in an Airtable base
  • Replacing shared spreadsheets with a permissioned internal tool for an operations team
  • A lightweight CRM over a PostgreSQL database that already exists
  • Partner or contractor dashboards where each party must see only its own jobs and documents

The honest half

Where it falls short

Concrete and checkable, so you can decide whether any of them matter to you. This is the half of a review a vendor will not write about Noloco.

  • Pricing follows user counts, and a client portal is by definition many low-activity users, so an agency with a few hundred client logins climbs the bands quickly for people who sign in twice a month.
  • Limits are inherited from the data source. Airtable record ceilings, API rate limits and slow queries appear in the portal your customers use, and no setting inside Noloco can fix them.
  • Design control is deliberately narrow. You get a consistent application shell rather than a bespoke interface, which is fine for operations and a problem for anything marketing-led.
  • It is a small vendor competing directly with Airtable Interfaces and Softr, both far larger, so roadmap pace and long-term viability are legitimate procurement questions.
  • Output is responsive web only, with no native mobile application and no offline mode, so field staff on poor connections are not served by it.

Cross-shopped

What people choose instead of Noloco

Each pairing was judged by two reviewers asking whether a buyer would genuinely weigh the two against each other. The ones that failed were deleted rather than published.

  • Noloco logo
    Noloco
    vs
    Softr logo
    Softr

    Softr: A larger template library and a faster route to a first working portal over Airtable

  • Noloco logo
    Noloco
    vs
    Glide logo
    Glide

    Glide: Better where the app is mostly views over a spreadsheet and mobile use matters

  • Noloco logo
    Noloco
    vs
    AppSheet logo
    AppSheet

    AppSheet: Worth comparing if the organisation is on Google Workspace and needs offline-capable mobile data capture

Pricing

What Noloco costs

Taken from the vendor's own pricing page. Prices move, so check before you buy.

Noloco

On request

  • Tiered plans differentiated by user counts, data sources and white labelling
  • Trial period rather than a permanent free plan
  • Higher tiers add custom domains, advanced permissions and priority support
  • Agency arrangements for multiple client portals handled directly
  • Rates are revised periodically, so the vendor page is the only reliable source

Capabilities

Features

  • Row-level permissions

    Rules that restrict each user to their own records without hand-built filters

  • Multiple data sources

    Airtable, PostgreSQL, MySQL, Google Sheets, HubSpot or built-in tables

  • Client portals

    Branded, custom-domain portals with separate internal and external user experiences

  • Workflows

    Triggered actions, notifications and record updates without external automation for simple cases

  • Forms and record detail pages

    Structured data entry with validation, file uploads and conditional fields

  • White labelling

    Custom domain, logo and colours so the portal reads as the client brand

Answered, with sources

Questions people ask

Each answer names the page it came from, so you can check it rather than take our word for it.

Do I need Airtable to use it?

No. Airtable is the most common source but PostgreSQL, MySQL, Google Sheets, HubSpot and built-in Noloco tables all work.

Can external clients log in without paying for seats?

Client and internal users are counted differently, but they are still counted, so a portal with many client logins moves you up the plan bands. Check the current band definitions before committing to a per-client model.

How is this different from Softr?

Both build portals over existing data. Noloco leans harder on permissions and multiple database sources; Softr leans on templates, speed to a first version and a bigger ecosystem.

Share

Keep looking

Where to go from Noloco

Best No-Code software for

Compare Noloco with

Other No-Code software

  • No-code platform for building web apps, client portals and directories from data

    Free, then $25/mo9 researched notes
  • Permissioned portals over data that stays in Airtable, Salesforce or Postgres

    Pricing on request12 researched notes
  • Start building and testing apps

    Free, then $5/mo10 researched notes
  • AI software development platform for building internal business apps from a spreadsheet, a prompt…

    Free plan10 researched notes
  • The open-source low-code framework

    Free plan13 researched notes
  • AI-assisted platform for building internal tools and business apps

    From $100/mo10 researched notes
  • Open-source low-code platform for building internal tools and business apps

    Free, then $79/mo10 researched notes
  • Two-way real-time sync between no-code databases and SaaS tools

    From $40/mo12 researched notes
  • No-code database app platform charging by data records and DataPages rather than by user seats

    11 researched notes
  • Low-code app builder priced per user per month, bundled into the wider Zoho ecosystem

    Free plan11 researched notes
  • Low-code process automation platform priced per user, per app, per month, with tier limits on data and AI volume

    11 researched notes
  • Front-end builder for applications whose data already lives somewhere else

    Free plan11 researched notes
  • Apache-licensed open source low-code platform, formerly Crust, positioned against Salesforce

    Open source12 researched notes
  • No-code backend with a visual workflow engine, used behind other tools rather than instead of them

    Free plan12 researched notes
  • Visual builder for React Native apps that exports the source code you keep

    Free plan12 researched notes
  • Full-stack web app builder with its own Postgres database and a GraphQL API over your tables

    Free plan12 researched notes
  • Affordable automation without limits

    Free, then $14/mo11 researched notes
  • Permissioned portals over data that stays in Airtable, Salesforce or Postgres

    Pricing on request12 researched notes

Softwr does not host reviews and shows no star rating for Noloco, because a rating we did not collect is not ours to publish. What is here is the pricing and platform detail from the vendor’s own pages, limitations we could state concretely, and alternatives a reviewer confirmed people weigh against it. Tell us if any of it is wrong.

More on Noloco

Best No-Code software alternatives

No-code application platform with published per-user pricing and enforced minimum seat counts

Per user per month, billed annually, with an enforced minimum seat count per tier

Enterprise low-code platform priced by application complexity units, not just users

Application Object consumption plus internal and external user packs

No-code, drag-and-drop mobile app builder priced by AI tokens and project counts

Per month, tiered by AI token allowance and project count

Low-code app builder priced per user per month, bundled into the wider Zoho ecosystem

Per user per month, billed annually

No-code database app platform charging by data records and DataPages rather than by user seats

Flat monthly fee by data record volume and DataPage count, unlimited users included

Siemens-owned low-code platform priced by app count, with cloud infrastructure billed separately

Per application tier (One App vs Unlimited Apps), cloud infrastructure billed separately

Low-code process automation platform priced per user, per app, per month, with tier limits on data and AI volume

Per user, per app, per month, escalating across Standard, Advanced and Premium tiers

Visual builder that outputs real Flutter code for iOS, Android and web

Per user per month

Compare Noloco with alternatives