Cloud · head to head
Infracost vs Wiz

Infracost
Cloud
Cloud cost estimates in pull requests, with governance in the paid tier
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Wiz
Cloud
Cloud and AI security platform unifying code, cloud, and runtime protection.
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Infracost has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Infracost usage-based resources such as object storage, serverless functions and data transfer have no cost without monthly usage figures supplied by hand, and the documentation warns plainly that engineers otherwise read them as free.; Wiz no public pricing; licensing requires a custom quote based on workloads and sensors.
- They diverge on capability: Infracost covers Pull request cost diffs, Wiz covers Cloud security posture management.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Infracost and Wiz actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cloud).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Infracost
- Pull request cost diffs
- Multi-format parsing
- Apache-2.0 CLI
- FinOps policies
- Automated remediation
- IDE integration
Only in Wiz
- Cloud security posture management
- Code security (Wiz Code)
- Runtime threat detection (Wiz Defend)
- AI security agents
- AI workload protection
- Attack path analysis
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Infracost
- Teams that want an expensive infrastructure change questioned at review rather than discovered on an invoicenot Wiz
- Platform groups enforcing tagging so cloud spend can be attributed to a team at allnot Wiz
- Organisations adopting FinOps practice without buying a full cloud management platformnot Wiz
- Engineers who want a cost figure in the editor while writing the Terraformnot Wiz
Wiz
- Identifying cloud misconfigurations across multi-cloud environmentsnot Infracost
- Securing code from IDE through CI/CD deploymentnot Infracost
- Detecting and responding to active threats at runtimenot Infracost
- Governing AI workloads and models in the cloudnot Infracost
- Prioritizing risk with cross-environment attack path analysisnot Infracost
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Infracost
- Usage-based resources such as object storage, serverless functions and data transfer have no cost without monthly usage figures supplied by hand, and the documentation warns plainly that engineers otherwise read them as free.
- Splitting production from non-production usage assumptions is not supported in the free usage file, which the docs attribute to a missing project filter, so that separation requires the paid product.
- The step from 250 to 1,000 dollars a month is large and the Cloud tier includes only ten admin seats, with developer seats charged at a figure that is not published, so the cost for a large organisation cannot be computed from the pricing page.
- Estimates are list price. Negotiated agreements, committed use discounts and reserved instance economics require SKU-level overrides available only on Enterprise, so the number in the pull request is not the number on the bill.
- The share of the product covered by the Apache-2.0 licence is shrinking. Checks, automated fixes, policies and agent integrations are all hosted-only, so the permissive licence increasingly protects the estimation engine rather than the product.
Wiz
- No public pricing; licensing requires a custom quote based on workloads and sensors.
- Modular licensing across Cloud, Code, Defend, and Sensor products can complicate cost planning.
- Full runtime protection value depends on deploying Wiz Sensor agents, adding operational overhead.
- Primarily aimed at mid-to-large enterprises despite the smaller Wiz Go bundle.
Pricing, plan by plan
Infracost
Free- FreeFree
- 1,000 runs a month
- Terraform, CloudFormation and CDK estimates
- Community support
- Starter$250/month
- 10,000 runs a month
- Email support
- Cloud$1000/month
- Ten admin seats, developer seats charged separately
- FinOps policies and cost guardrails
- Dashboards and audit trails
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- SKU-level price overrides for negotiated rates
- Business unit reporting
- SSO with SAML group mapping
Wiz
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Wiz review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Infracost if
- You need pull request cost diffs.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, macOS, Linux, Windows, Docker.
- You also want multi-format parsing.
Choose Wiz if
- You need cloud security posture management.
- You work on web, api.
- You also want code security (wiz code).
Questions people ask
- Is Infracost or Wiz better?
- Neither clearly leads. Infracost starts at Free and Wiz at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Infracost or Wiz?
- Infracost has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Infracost and On request for Wiz.
- Does Infracost or Wiz run on more platforms?
- Infracost runs on Web, macOS, Linux, Windows, Docker. Wiz runs on web, api.
- Can I use Infracost for free?
- Yes. Infracost has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Wiz starts at On request.
- What is Infracost best used for?
- Infracost is most often used for teams that want an expensive infrastructure change questioned at review rather than discovered on an invoice, platform groups enforcing tagging so cloud spend can be attributed to a team at all, organisations adopting finops practice without buying a full cloud management platform, engineers who want a cost figure in the editor while writing the terraform. Of those, teams that want an expensive infrastructure change questioned at review rather than discovered on an invoice and platform groups enforcing tagging so cloud spend can be attributed to a team at all are not what Wiz is typically brought in for.
- What can Infracost do that Wiz cannot?
- Infracost covers Pull request cost diffs, Multi-format parsing, Apache-2.0 CLI, FinOps policies. Wiz covers Cloud security posture management, Code security (Wiz Code), Runtime threat detection (Wiz Defend), AI security agents.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Infracost: Is the open source version genuinely useful on its own?
Yes, for estimation. It parses your definitions and produces breakdowns and diffs locally. What it does not do is comment on pull requests, enforce policy or report across an organisation, all of which are hosted-only.
Wiz: How much does Wiz cost?
Wiz does not publish standard pricing. The platform uses modular licensing based on workloads, active developers, log ingestion, or sensors. All pricing requires requesting a custom quote directly from the company.
SourceInfracost: Will the estimate match my cloud bill?
No. It is list price. Committed use discounts, enterprise agreements and reserved instances need SKU-level overrides that sit in the Enterprise tier.
Wiz: Does Wiz offer a free trial?
No free trial information is mentioned on Wiz's pricing page. Pricing is determined by custom quote based on organizational needs.
SourceInfracost: Why do my S3 and Lambda resources show no cost?
Usage-based resources need monthly usage values supplied in a usage file or defined centrally. Without them they estimate at zero, which is the documented behaviour and the most common way the tool misleads.
Wiz: What products does Wiz offer?
Wiz provides five modular licensing options: Wiz Cloud, Wiz Code, Wiz Defend, Wiz Sensor, and Wiz Go Bundle for SMBs, allowing organizations to scale based on specific security requirements.
SourceInfracost: Has the licence ever changed?
No. The command line tool has been Apache 2.0 throughout, with no Business Source or AGPL episode, which is unusual in this category.
Infracost: What is a run?
Not defined on the public pricing page, and the run allowance is what separates the free and Starter tiers, so establish the definition before choosing between them.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Infracost vs Terragrunt
- Infracost vs Pulumi
- Infracost vs Packer
- Infracost vs Serverless Framework
- Infracost vs SST
- Infracost vs Coolify
- Infracost vs CapRover
- Infracost vs DeepInfra
- Infracost vs Linode
- Infracost vs VictoriaMetrics
- Infracost vs Contabo
- Infracost vs Chef
- Infracost vs Cilium
- Infracost vs Vagrant
- Infracost vs containerd
- Infracost vs Orca Security
- Infracost vs Northflank
- Infracost vs Akamai
- Infracost vs Fly.io
- Infracost vs Portworx
- Infracost vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Infracost vs Proxmox VE
- Infracost vs Rancher
- Infracost vs Azure Functions
- Infracost vs Zeabur
- Infracost vs Zipkin
- Infracost vs Fireworks AI
- Infracost vs Heroku
- Infracost vs Thanos
- Wiz vs Terragrunt
- Wiz vs Pulumi
- Wiz vs Packer
- Wiz vs Serverless Framework
- Wiz vs SST
- Wiz vs Coolify
- Wiz vs CapRover
- Wiz vs DeepInfra
- Wiz vs Linode
- Wiz vs VictoriaMetrics
- Wiz vs Contabo
- Wiz vs Chef
- Wiz vs Cilium
- Wiz vs Vagrant
- Wiz vs containerd
- Wiz vs Orca Security
- Wiz vs Northflank
- Wiz vs Akamai
- Wiz vs Fly.io
- Wiz vs Portworx
- Wiz vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Wiz vs Proxmox VE
- Wiz vs Rancher
- Wiz vs Azure Functions
- Wiz vs Zeabur
- Wiz vs Zipkin
- Wiz vs Fireworks AI
- Wiz vs Heroku
- Wiz vs Thanos
