Podcast & Audio Publishing · head to head
Zencastr vs Auphonic

Zencastr
Podcast & Audio Publishing
Free podcast recording in your browser
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Auphonic
Podcast & Audio Publishing
Automated audio mastering and loudness processing
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Zencastr the pricing page lists no dollar amount for any tier; the paid Enterprise tier is marked Custom and requires contacting sales; Auphonic the free tier covers 2 hours of processed audio a month
- They diverge on capability: Zencastr covers Browser-based recording, Auphonic covers Automatic loudness optimization.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Zencastr and Auphonic actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (freemium), free tier (Yes), platforms (Web), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Podcast & Audio Publishing).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Zencastr
- Browser-based recording
- Separate tracks
- Automatic postproduction
- Video recording
- Lossless audio
- Cloud storage
- Editing software
- Encrypted recording
Only in Auphonic
- Automatic loudness optimization
- Noise reduction
- Audio restoration
- Intelligent processing
- API integration
- Auto-upload
- FTP
- Secure processing
Both cover
- Dropbox
- Google Drive
- Podcast hosts
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Zencastr
- Recording remote podcast interviews with separate local tracks per guestnot Auphonic
- Recording video podcasts in the browser without guest software installsnot Auphonic
- Publishing recorded episodes and clips from one workspacenot Auphonic
Auphonic
- Automatic loudness levelling and noise reduction on podcast audionot Zencastr
- Batch processing an archive of recordingsnot Zencastr
- Generating transcripts and chapters from an episodenot Zencastr
- Producing consistent output across multiple formats from one uploadnot Zencastr
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Zencastr
- The pricing page lists no dollar amount for any tier; the paid Enterprise tier is marked Custom and requires contacting sales
- The free tier caps a session at 6 participants
- The free tier caps video streaming quality at 1080p
- The free tier is limited to 5 podcast shows and 4 seats
Auphonic
- The free tier covers 2 hours of processed audio a month
- Billing is by audio duration with a 3 minute minimum per production, so many short clips cost more than the running time suggests
- Multilingual speech recognition, automatic chapters and show notes all require a paid plan
- Watch folders, batch productions and team accounts are paid features
- Free output carries an Auphonic jingle
Pricing, plan by plan
Zencastr
Free- HobbyistFree
- 8 hours/month audio
- MP3 quality
- Up to 2 guests
- Professional$20/month
- Unlimited recording
- WAV lossless quality
- Video recording
Auphonic
Free- FreeFree
- 2 hours/month processing
- Basic mastering
- Download files
- Personal$10/month
- 50 hours/month
- Advanced mastering
- API access
Which should you pick?
Choose Zencastr if
- You need browser-based recording.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want separate tracks.
Choose Auphonic if
- You need automatic loudness optimization.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want noise reduction.
Questions people ask
- Is Zencastr or Auphonic better?
- Neither clearly leads. Zencastr starts at Free and Auphonic at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Zencastr or Auphonic?
- Zencastr starts at Free and Auphonic at Free.
- Does Zencastr or Auphonic run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- Can I use Zencastr for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Zencastr best used for?
- Zencastr is most often used for recording remote podcast interviews with separate local tracks per guest, recording video podcasts in the browser without guest software installs, publishing recorded episodes and clips from one workspace. Of those, recording remote podcast interviews with separate local tracks per guest and recording video podcasts in the browser without guest software installs are not what Auphonic is typically brought in for.
- What can Zencastr do that Auphonic cannot?
- Zencastr covers Browser-based recording, Separate tracks, Automatic postproduction, Video recording. Auphonic covers Automatic loudness optimization, Noise reduction, Audio restoration, Intelligent processing. Both handle Dropbox, Google Drive, Podcast hosts, Web support.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Zencastr vs Pocketcasts
- Zencastr vs Buzzsprout
- Zencastr vs Transistor.fm
- Zencastr vs Adobe Podcast
- Zencastr vs Apple Podcasts Connect
- Zencastr vs Libsyn
- Zencastr vs Patreon
- Zencastr vs Podbean
- Zencastr vs Transistor
- Zencastr vs Acast
- Zencastr vs Alitu
- Zencastr vs Audioboom
- Zencastr vs Blubrry
- Zencastr vs Captivate
- Zencastr vs Castmagic
- Zencastr vs Castos
- Zencastr vs Chartable
- Zencastr vs Cleanfeed
- Auphonic vs Pocketcasts
- Auphonic vs Buzzsprout
- Auphonic vs Transistor.fm
- Auphonic vs Adobe Podcast
- Auphonic vs Apple Podcasts Connect
- Auphonic vs Libsyn
- Auphonic vs Patreon
- Auphonic vs Podbean
- Auphonic vs Transistor
- Auphonic vs Acast
- Auphonic vs Alitu
- Auphonic vs Audioboom
- Auphonic vs Blubrry
- Auphonic vs Captivate
- Auphonic vs Castmagic
- Auphonic vs Castos
- Auphonic vs Chartable
- Auphonic vs Cleanfeed
