Softwr

Software · head to head

Auphonic vs Hindenburg Journalist

Auphonic logo

Auphonic

Software

Automated audio mastering and loudness processing

From
Free
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
Hindenburg Journalist logo

Hindenburg Journalist

Software

Professional audio editing for storytellers

From
$12/month
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Only Auphonic has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
  • Each has a real cost: Auphonic the free tier covers 2 hours of processed audio a month; Hindenburg Journalist the perpetual licence page publishes no price; the amount is only shown once you reach the purchase step
  • They diverge on capability: Auphonic covers Automatic loudness optimization, Hindenburg Journalist covers Multi-track editing.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Auphonic and Hindenburg Journalist actually diverge.

Attributes where Auphonic and Hindenburg Journalist differ
AttributeAuphonicHindenburg Journalist
Starting priceFree$12/month
Pricing modelfreemiumsubscription
Free tierYesNo
PlatformsWebMacos, Windows
Founded20102009

Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Auphonic

  • Automatic loudness optimization
  • Audio restoration
  • Intelligent processing
  • API integration
  • Auto-upload
  • Podcast hosts
  • Dropbox
  • Google Drive

Only in Hindenburg Journalist

  • Multi-track editing
  • Automatic leveling
  • Voice profiler
  • EQ and effects
  • Broadcast specs
  • Cloud storage
  • Publishing platforms
  • DAWs

Both cover

  • Noise reduction

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Auphonic

  • Automatic loudness levelling and noise reduction on podcast audionot Hindenburg Journalist
  • Batch processing an archive of recordingsnot Hindenburg Journalist
  • Generating transcripts and chapters from an episodenot Hindenburg Journalist
  • Producing consistent output across multiple formats from one uploadnot Hindenburg Journalist

Hindenburg Journalist

  • Editing spoken word audio for radio and podcast productionnot Auphonic
  • Multitrack assembly of interviews with automatic level adjustmentnot Auphonic
  • Transcribing interviews and editing audio from the transcript on subscription plansnot Auphonic

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Auphonic

  • The free tier covers 2 hours of processed audio a month
  • Billing is by audio duration with a 3 minute minimum per production, so many short clips cost more than the running time suggests
  • Multilingual speech recognition, automatic chapters and show notes all require a paid plan
  • Watch folders, batch productions and team accounts are paid features
  • Free output carries an Auphonic jingle

Hindenburg Journalist

  • The perpetual licence page publishes no price; the amount is only shown once you reach the purchase step
  • Perpetual licences are sold to individuals only and are not available to companies or educational institutions
  • Transcription is not available at all on the perpetual licence beyond a 30 hour introductory allowance that expires after the first month, because the feature requires a monthly subscription
  • Subscription transcription is metered at 20 to 50 hours per month depending on tier

Pricing, plan by plan

Auphonic

Free
  • FreeFree
    • 2 hours/month processing
    • Basic mastering
    • Download files
  • Personal$10/month
    • 50 hours/month
    • Advanced mastering
    • API access

Hindenburg Journalist

$12/month
  • Journalist$12/month
    • Multi-track editing
    • Automatic leveling
    • Voice profiler
  • Pro$35/month
    • All Journalist features
    • Advanced plugins
    • Broadcast specs

Which should you pick?

Choose Auphonic if

  • You need automatic loudness optimization.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You also want audio restoration.
Auphonic review

Choose Hindenburg Journalist if

  • You need multi-track editing.
  • You work on Macos, Windows.
  • You also want automatic leveling.
Hindenburg Journalist review

Questions people ask

Is Auphonic or Hindenburg Journalist better?
Neither clearly leads. Auphonic starts at Free and Hindenburg Journalist at $12/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Auphonic or Hindenburg Journalist?
Auphonic has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Auphonic and $12/month for Hindenburg Journalist.
Does Auphonic or Hindenburg Journalist run on more platforms?
Auphonic runs on Web. Hindenburg Journalist runs on Macos, Windows.
Can I use Auphonic for free?
Yes. Auphonic has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Hindenburg Journalist starts at $12/month.
What is Auphonic best used for?
Auphonic is most often used for automatic loudness levelling and noise reduction on podcast audio, batch processing an archive of recordings, generating transcripts and chapters from an episode, producing consistent output across multiple formats from one upload. Of those, automatic loudness levelling and noise reduction on podcast audio and batch processing an archive of recordings are not what Hindenburg Journalist is typically brought in for.
What can Auphonic do that Hindenburg Journalist cannot?
Auphonic covers Automatic loudness optimization, Audio restoration, Intelligent processing, API integration. Hindenburg Journalist covers Multi-track editing, Automatic leveling, Voice profiler, EQ and effects. Both handle Noise reduction.
ShareXLinkedInRedditWhatsAppEmail

Related pages

More on Auphonic

More on Hindenburg Journalist

Keep looking

Other head to heads