Software · head to head
Auphonic vs Cleanfeed
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Auphonic the free tier covers 2 hours of processed audio a month; Cleanfeed the free Lite plan is limited to 2 guests and 1 local audio source
- They diverge on capability: Auphonic covers Automatic loudness optimization, Cleanfeed covers Browser-based recording.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Auphonic and Cleanfeed actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (freemium), free tier (Yes), platforms (Web), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Auphonic
- Automatic loudness optimization
- Noise reduction
- Audio restoration
- Intelligent processing
- API integration
- Auto-upload
- Podcast hosts
- FTP
Only in Cleanfeed
- Browser-based recording
- Local recording
- Separate tracks
- Lossless quality
- Cloud backup
- Easy sharing
- Encrypted recording
Both cover
- Dropbox
- Google Drive
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Auphonic
- Automatic loudness levelling and noise reduction on podcast audionot Cleanfeed
- Batch processing an archive of recordingsnot Cleanfeed
- Generating transcripts and chapters from an episodenot Cleanfeed
- Producing consistent output across multiple formats from one uploadnot Cleanfeed
Cleanfeed
- Recording remote interviews in the browser at broadcast audio qualitynot Auphonic
- Capturing isolated multitrack recordings of each remote guestnot Auphonic
- Live radio and broadcast contribution links between studiosnot Auphonic
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Auphonic
- The free tier covers 2 hours of processed audio a month
- Billing is by audio duration with a 3 minute minimum per production, so many short clips cost more than the running time suggests
- Multilingual speech recognition, automatic chapters and show notes all require a paid plan
- Watch folders, batch productions and team accounts are paid features
- Free output carries an Auphonic jingle
Cleanfeed
- The free Lite plan is limited to 2 guests and 1 local audio source
- Remote audio on the free Lite plan is mono; stereo requires Pro
- Multitrack recording with an isolated track per guest is a Pro only feature
- Audio repair modes, markers, clip playback and privacy controls are Pro only
- Business Pro seats are priced higher than individual seats for identical features
- The Cinema tier for video is $2,500 per year for the first seat, with extra seats charged separately
Pricing, plan by plan
Auphonic
Free- FreeFree
- 2 hours/month processing
- Basic mastering
- Download files
- Personal$10/month
- 50 hours/month
- Advanced mastering
- API access
Cleanfeed
Free- FreeFree
- 30 min sessions
- Local recording
- 2 participants
- Standard$15/month
- Unlimited sessions
- Separate tracks
- 4 participants
Which should you pick?
Choose Auphonic if
- You need automatic loudness optimization.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want noise reduction.
Choose Cleanfeed if
- You need browser-based recording.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want local recording.
Questions people ask
- Is Auphonic or Cleanfeed better?
- Neither clearly leads. Auphonic starts at Free and Cleanfeed at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Auphonic or Cleanfeed?
- Auphonic starts at Free and Cleanfeed at Free.
- Does Auphonic or Cleanfeed run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- Can I use Auphonic for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Auphonic best used for?
- Auphonic is most often used for automatic loudness levelling and noise reduction on podcast audio, batch processing an archive of recordings, generating transcripts and chapters from an episode, producing consistent output across multiple formats from one upload. Of those, automatic loudness levelling and noise reduction on podcast audio and batch processing an archive of recordings are not what Cleanfeed is typically brought in for.
- What can Auphonic do that Cleanfeed cannot?
- Auphonic covers Automatic loudness optimization, Noise reduction, Audio restoration, Intelligent processing. Cleanfeed covers Browser-based recording, Local recording, Separate tracks, Lossless quality. Both handle Dropbox, Google Drive, Web support.
Related pages
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Auphonic vs Pocketcasts
- Auphonic vs Buzzsprout
- Auphonic vs Transistor.fm
- Auphonic vs Adobe Podcast
- Auphonic vs Apple Podcasts Connect
- Auphonic vs Libsyn
- Auphonic vs Patreon
- Auphonic vs Podbean
- Auphonic vs Transistor
- Auphonic vs Acast
- Auphonic vs Alitu
- Auphonic vs Audioboom
- Auphonic vs Blubrry
- Auphonic vs Captivate
- Auphonic vs Castmagic
- Auphonic vs Castos
- Auphonic vs Chartable
- Cleanfeed vs Pocketcasts
- Cleanfeed vs Buzzsprout
- Cleanfeed vs Transistor.fm
- Cleanfeed vs Adobe Podcast
- Cleanfeed vs Apple Podcasts Connect
- Cleanfeed vs Libsyn
- Cleanfeed vs Patreon
- Cleanfeed vs Podbean
- Cleanfeed vs Transistor
- Cleanfeed vs Acast
- Cleanfeed vs Alitu
- Cleanfeed vs Audioboom
- Cleanfeed vs Blubrry
- Cleanfeed vs Captivate
- Cleanfeed vs Castmagic
- Cleanfeed vs Castos
- Cleanfeed vs Chartable


