Logging · head to head
Traceloop vs Azure Monitor

Traceloop
Logging
LLM reliability platform with open-source observability and evaluation
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Traceloop free tier limited to 50k spans per month and 24-hour retention, restricting production use; Azure Monitor billed per GB ingested across three separate log plans, Auxiliary, Basic and Analytics, so the plan chosen changes the rate as much as the volume does
- They diverge on capability: Traceloop covers Open-source SDK (OpenLLMetry), Azure Monitor covers Log collection.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Traceloop and Azure Monitor actually diverge.
| Attribute | Traceloop | Azure Monitor |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Freemium with pay-as-you-go enterprise option | usage-based |
| Platforms | Cloud, On-premises, Air-gapped, Python, TypeScript, Go, Ruby | Web, Api |
| Founded | Unknown | 2010 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Logging).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Traceloop
- Open-source SDK (OpenLLMetry)
- Multi-provider support
- Observability platform integration
- Framework support
- Monitoring dashboard
- Evaluation system
- Deployment flexibility
Only in Azure Monitor
- Log collection
- Metrics collection
- Alerts and notifications
- Custom dashboards
- API
- Webhooks
- REST
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Traceloop
- Monitoring LLM application performance in productionnot Azure Monitor
- Instrumenting LLM apps with minimal code overheadnot Azure Monitor
- Continuous evaluation and quality scoring of LLM outputsnot Azure Monitor
- Debugging LLM application issues with full trace visibilitynot Azure Monitor
- Integrating observability data into existing monitoring stacksnot Azure Monitor
Azure Monitor
- Collecting logs and metrics from Azure resourcesnot Traceloop
- Alerting on metric thresholds and log queriesnot Traceloop
- Application performance monitoring through Application Insightsnot Traceloop
- Long-term log retention for compliancenot Traceloop
- Querying operational data with KQLnot Traceloop
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Traceloop
- Free tier limited to 50k spans per month and 24-hour retention, restricting production use
- Company acquisition by ServiceNow creates uncertainty about future roadmap
- Requires integration with separate observability platforms for visualization
- Less feature-rich than dedicated LLM evaluation platforms
Azure Monitor
- Billed per GB ingested across three separate log plans, Auxiliary, Basic and Analytics, so the plan chosen changes the rate as much as the volume does
- Only the first 5 GB a month of Analytics logs is free per billing account
- Retention beyond the base period is charged per GB per month, up to 2 years interactive and 12 years long term
- Log queries and search jobs are billed per GB scanned, so investigating an incident costs money
- Alert rules are billed per time series for metrics and by execution frequency for logs
- The pricing page shows placeholders rather than rates until a region and currency are chosen
Pricing, plan by plan
Traceloop
Free- FreeFree
- 50,000 spans per month
- Up to 5 seats
- 24-hour data retention
- Enterprise$undefined/custom
- Unlimited spans per month
- Unlimited seats
- Custom data retention
Azure Monitor
Free- FreeFree
- Log collection
- Metrics collection
- Alerts and notifications
Which should you pick?
Choose Traceloop if
- You need open-source sdk (openllmetry).
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud, On-premises, Air-gapped, Python, TypeScript, Go, Ruby.
- You also want multi-provider support.
Choose Azure Monitor if
- You need log collection.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want metrics collection.
Questions people ask
- Is Traceloop or Azure Monitor better?
- Neither clearly leads. Traceloop starts at Free and Azure Monitor at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Traceloop or Azure Monitor?
- Traceloop starts at Free and Azure Monitor at Free.
- Does Traceloop or Azure Monitor run on more platforms?
- Traceloop runs on Cloud, On-premises, Air-gapped, Python, TypeScript, Go, Ruby. Azure Monitor runs on Web, Api.
- Can I use Traceloop for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Traceloop best used for?
- Traceloop is most often used for monitoring llm application performance in production, instrumenting llm apps with minimal code overhead, continuous evaluation and quality scoring of llm outputs, debugging llm application issues with full trace visibility. Of those, monitoring llm application performance in production and instrumenting llm apps with minimal code overhead are not what Azure Monitor is typically brought in for.
- What can Traceloop do that Azure Monitor cannot?
- Traceloop covers Open-source SDK (OpenLLMetry), Multi-provider support, Observability platform integration, Framework support. Azure Monitor covers Log collection, Metrics collection, Alerts and notifications, Custom dashboards.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Traceloop: Is OpenLLMetry open-source?
Yes, OpenLLMetry is Traceloop's open-source SDK built on OpenTelemetry standards. It allows teams to instrument LLM applications with just 2 lines of code and send data to 25+ observability platforms.
SourceAzure Monitor: How does Azure Monitor billing work?
Billing is based on data volume ingested into Azure Monitor. Additional charges apply separately for alerts, notifications, web tests, and data export. Activity log and platform metrics are automatically collected with an Azure subscription.
SourceTraceloop: What is the impact of ServiceNow acquisition?
Traceloop is joining ServiceNow, representing a strategic acquisition that will broaden enterprise adoption and integration capabilities. Current operations continue with free and enterprise options available.
SourceAzure Monitor: What savings are available with Azure Monitor?
Capacity reservations offer up to 36% savings compared to standard pay-as-you-go pricing when you commit to reserved capacity upfront.
SourceTraceloop: How many LLM providers and frameworks does Traceloop support?
Traceloop supports 20+ LLM providers including OpenAI and Anthropic, and integrates with frameworks like LangChain and LlamaIndex. It can send data to 25+ observability platforms.
SourceAzure Monitor: Is there a free tier for Azure Monitor?
No dedicated free tier exists. Activity log and platform metrics are automatically collected with an Azure subscription, but detailed monitoring requires additional configuration and associated costs.
SourceRelated pages
More on Azure Monitor
Other head to heads
- Traceloop vs Elastic Stack
- Traceloop vs New Relic
- Traceloop vs Datadog Logs
- Traceloop vs Coralogix
- Traceloop vs Grafana Loki
- Traceloop vs incident.io
- Traceloop vs Cronitor
- Traceloop vs FireHydrant
- Traceloop vs Healthchecks
- Traceloop vs Openstatus
- Traceloop vs Rootly
- Traceloop vs Checkly
- Traceloop vs CloudWatch
- Traceloop vs Dynatrace
- Traceloop vs InfluxDB
- Traceloop vs Airbrake
- Traceloop vs AppDynamics
- Traceloop vs Axiom
- Azure Monitor vs Elastic Stack
- Azure Monitor vs New Relic
- Azure Monitor vs Datadog Logs
- Azure Monitor vs Coralogix
- Azure Monitor vs Grafana Loki
- Azure Monitor vs incident.io
- Azure Monitor vs Cronitor
- Azure Monitor vs FireHydrant
- Azure Monitor vs Healthchecks
- Azure Monitor vs Openstatus
- Azure Monitor vs Rootly
- Azure Monitor vs Checkly
- Azure Monitor vs CloudWatch
- Azure Monitor vs Dynatrace
- Azure Monitor vs InfluxDB
- Azure Monitor vs Airbrake
- Azure Monitor vs AppDynamics
- Azure Monitor vs Axiom

