APIs · head to head
Enable Banking vs Thredd

Enable Banking
APIs
European bank API aggregation with a free restricted production tier for your own accounts
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Thredd
APIs
Issuer processing platform for fintechs and digital banks, formerly Global Processing Services
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Enable Banking has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Enable Banking production pricing is quoted per connected account and call volume with no published rate card, so a free proof of concept gives you no idea of cost at scale.; Thredd pricing is entirely unpublished, so cost comparison against competing processors requires a sales process.
- They diverge on capability: Enable Banking covers European bank coverage, Thredd covers Issuer processing.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Enable Banking and Thredd actually diverge.
| Attribute | Enable Banking | Thredd |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | Per connected account per month | quote |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Web, REST API | Web, API |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (APIs).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Enable Banking
- European bank coverage
- Free sandbox
- Restricted production
- TPP infrastructure as a service
- Consent handling
- Payment initiation
Only in Thredd
- Issuer processing
- Multi-country reach
- Scheme certification
- Programme support across verticals
- High platform availability
- Global office footprint
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Enable Banking
- A small fintech that needs to operate as an agent rather than wait a year for its own AISP authorisationnot Thredd
- An accounting software vendor pulling bank transactions across several European countriesnot Thredd
- A treasury tool building and testing a real integration before committing to a contractnot Thredd
- A lender verifying applicant income from bank data across the Nordics and the EUnot Thredd
Thredd
- A digital bank or fintech needing issuer processing across many countries under one contractnot Enable Banking
- A BNPL, lending or crypto product needing certified card processing behind its own brandnot Enable Banking
- A company that finds outdated Global Processing Services (GPS) material and needs to confirm it is now Threddnot Enable Banking
- An embedded finance platform wanting a processor already integrated with core banking systems such as Mambunot Enable Banking
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Enable Banking
- Production pricing is quoted per connected account and call volume with no published rate card, so a free proof of concept gives you no idea of cost at scale.
- Coverage is European, which rules it out as a single supplier for anyone needing UK plus North American bank data as well.
- Operating as an agent under the Enable Banking licence means your regulatory permission depends on another company remaining authorised and willing to sponsor you.
- Bank API quality varies widely across Europe, and outages or degraded endpoints at individual institutions surface as failures in your own product.
- It is a small Finnish company selling into regulated financial services, so enterprise procurement and vendor resilience reviews are a recurring obstacle.
Thredd
- Pricing is entirely unpublished, so cost comparison against competing processors requires a sales process.
- The 2023 rebrand from GPS to Thredd means research under either name alone can miss relevant material, and partner or press references before 2023 will still say GPS.
- Issuer processing does not include the banking licence itself, so a fintech still needs a separate BIN sponsor or bank partner, adding a second relationship to manage.
- As shared infrastructure behind many fintech brands, an outage or processing delay at Thredd becomes a simultaneous incident for every programme running on it, with limited visibility for any single customer into root cause.
- Its verticals span crypto, BNPL and remittance broadly, so depth of specialist support in any one vertical may be thinner than a processor focused narrowly on that niche.
Pricing, plan by plan
Enable Banking
Free- Sandbox and restricted productionFree
- Mock and real bank sandbox access
- Production access limited to accounts you link yourself
- Full API surface for development and certification
- Production$undefined/year
- Quoted by connected accounts per month and call volume
- Priced by number of institutions and markets in scope
- Different rates under your own licence or as an agent
Thredd
On request- Thredd$undefined/year
- Volume and programme-based pricing, not published
- Custom quote required via sales
Which should you pick?
Choose Enable Banking if
- You need european bank coverage.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, REST API.
- You also want free sandbox.
Choose Thredd if
- You need issuer processing.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want multi-country reach.
Questions people ask
- Is Enable Banking or Thredd better?
- Neither clearly leads. Enable Banking starts at Free and Thredd at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Enable Banking or Thredd?
- Enable Banking has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Enable Banking and On request for Thredd.
- Does Enable Banking or Thredd run on more platforms?
- Enable Banking runs on Web, REST API. Thredd runs on Web, API.
- Can I use Enable Banking for free?
- Yes. Enable Banking has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Thredd starts at On request.
- What is Enable Banking best used for?
- Enable Banking is most often used for a small fintech that needs to operate as an agent rather than wait a year for its own aisp authorisation, an accounting software vendor pulling bank transactions across several european countries, a treasury tool building and testing a real integration before committing to a contract, a lender verifying applicant income from bank data across the nordics and the eu. Of those, a small fintech that needs to operate as an agent rather than wait a year for its own aisp authorisation and an accounting software vendor pulling bank transactions across several european countries are not what Thredd is typically brought in for.
- What can Enable Banking do that Thredd cannot?
- Enable Banking covers European bank coverage, Free sandbox, Restricted production, TPP infrastructure as a service. Thredd covers Issuer processing, Multi-country reach, Scheme certification, Programme support across verticals.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Enable Banking: Is there really a free tier?
Yes, sandbox plus restricted production against accounts you link yourself. Commercial third-party access is quoted separately.
Thredd: Is Thredd the same company as Global Processing Services?
Yes, GPS rebranded as Thredd in 2023; it is the same company and platform.
Enable Banking: Do I need my own AISP licence?
No. Enable Banking offers third-party provider infrastructure as a service so you can operate as an agent under its authorisation.
Thredd: Does it hold the banking licence for programmes it processes?
No, Thredd is the issuer processor; a separate bank or BIN sponsor holds the actual issuing licence.
Enable Banking: How is production priced?
By connected accounts per month and call volume, adjusted for markets in scope and whether you use your own licence.
Thredd: Is pricing published?
No, it requires a sales conversation.
Related pages
More on Enable Banking
Other head to heads
- Enable Banking vs Salt Edge
- Enable Banking vs Tink
- Enable Banking vs TrueLayer
- Enable Banking vs Ozone API
- Enable Banking vs Token.io
- Enable Banking vs Neonomics
- Enable Banking vs Method Financial
- Enable Banking vs Yapily
- Enable Banking vs MX Technologies
- Enable Banking vs Yodlee
- Enable Banking vs Enfuce
- Enable Banking vs Bud Financial
- Enable Banking vs Treasury Prime
- Enable Banking vs 10x Banking
- Enable Banking vs Brite Payments
- Enable Banking vs Bruno
- Enable Banking vs Lithic
- Enable Banking vs Tribe Payments
- Enable Banking vs Unit
- Enable Banking vs Highnote
- Enable Banking vs Marqeta
- Enable Banking vs Weavr
- Enable Banking vs Synctera
- Enable Banking vs Paymentology
- Enable Banking vs Toqio
- Enable Banking vs Stoplight
- Enable Banking vs Swan
- Enable Banking vs Temenos Transact
- Thredd vs Salt Edge
- Thredd vs Tink
- Thredd vs TrueLayer
- Thredd vs Ozone API
- Thredd vs Token.io
- Thredd vs Neonomics
- Thredd vs Method Financial
- Thredd vs Yapily
- Thredd vs MX Technologies
- Thredd vs Yodlee
- Thredd vs Enfuce
- Thredd vs Bud Financial
- Thredd vs Treasury Prime
- Thredd vs 10x Banking
- Thredd vs Brite Payments
- Thredd vs Bruno
- Thredd vs Lithic
- Thredd vs Tribe Payments
- Thredd vs Unit
- Thredd vs Highnote
- Thredd vs Marqeta
- Thredd vs Weavr
- Thredd vs Synctera
- Thredd vs Paymentology
- Thredd vs Toqio
- Thredd vs Stoplight
- Thredd vs Swan
- Thredd vs Temenos Transact
