APIs · head to head
Enable Banking vs Lithic

Enable Banking
APIs
European bank API aggregation with a free restricted production tier for your own accounts
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Lithic
APIs
API-first card issuing platform with direct Visa, Mastercard and Amex network connections
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Enable Banking has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Enable Banking production pricing is quoted per connected account and call volume with no published rate card, so a free proof of concept gives you no idea of cost at scale.; Lithic pricing is entirely undisclosed, so a company cannot compare total cost against Marqeta, Galileo or Highnote without a sales conversation.
- They diverge on capability: Enable Banking covers European bank coverage, Lithic covers Direct network connections.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Enable Banking and Lithic actually diverge.
| Attribute | Enable Banking | Lithic |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | Per connected account per month | quote |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Web, REST API | Web, API |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (APIs).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Enable Banking
- European bank coverage
- Free sandbox
- Restricted production
- TPP infrastructure as a service
- Consent handling
- Payment initiation
Only in Lithic
- Direct network connections
- Processor Client mode
- Lithic Program Management
- Card lifecycle APIs
- Sandbox environment
- Real-time authorization controls
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Enable Banking
- A small fintech that needs to operate as an agent rather than wait a year for its own AISP authorisationnot Lithic
- An accounting software vendor pulling bank transactions across several European countriesnot Lithic
- A treasury tool building and testing a real integration before committing to a contractnot Lithic
- A lender verifying applicant income from bank data across the Nordics and the EUnot Lithic
Lithic
- A fintech wanting direct Visa or Mastercard network access rather than routing through a third-party processornot Enable Banking
- A company that already holds its own issuing licence and wants API access without full programme managementnot Enable Banking
- A neobank or expense platform wanting Lithic to manage bank and network relationships end to endnot Enable Banking
- A product team prototyping a card programme in sandbox before committing to a launchnot Enable Banking
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Enable Banking
- Production pricing is quoted per connected account and call volume with no published rate card, so a free proof of concept gives you no idea of cost at scale.
- Coverage is European, which rules it out as a single supplier for anyone needing UK plus North American bank data as well.
- Operating as an agent under the Enable Banking licence means your regulatory permission depends on another company remaining authorised and willing to sponsor you.
- Bank API quality varies widely across Europe, and outages or degraded endpoints at individual institutions surface as failures in your own product.
- It is a small Finnish company selling into regulated financial services, so enterprise procurement and vendor resilience reviews are a recurring obstacle.
Lithic
- Pricing is entirely undisclosed, so a company cannot compare total cost against Marqeta, Galileo or Highnote without a sales conversation.
- Choosing Processor Client mode still leaves the company responsible for holding its own issuing licence and managing the regulatory relationship, which is a substantial undertaking many teams underestimate.
- As with any card infrastructure provider, an outage or network issue at Lithic becomes a direct outage for every card programme built on it, and a customer has limited visibility into root cause during an incident.
- Building a card programme on API infrastructure requires real engineering investment; it is not a plug-and-play product for a non-technical team.
- Switching card infrastructure providers after launch is a major undertaking involving card reissuance and programme migration, so the initial choice carries lasting lock-in.
Pricing, plan by plan
Enable Banking
Free- Sandbox and restricted productionFree
- Mock and real bank sandbox access
- Production access limited to accounts you link yourself
- Full API surface for development and certification
- Production$undefined/year
- Quoted by connected accounts per month and call volume
- Priced by number of institutions and markets in scope
- Different rates under your own licence or as an agent
Lithic
On request- Lithic$undefined/year
- Volume and interchange-based pricing, not published
- Separate Processor Client and Program Management pricing tracks
- Custom quote required via sales
Which should you pick?
Choose Enable Banking if
- You need european bank coverage.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, REST API.
- You also want free sandbox.
Choose Lithic if
- You need direct network connections.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want processor client mode.
Questions people ask
- Is Enable Banking or Lithic better?
- Neither clearly leads. Enable Banking starts at Free and Lithic at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Enable Banking or Lithic?
- Enable Banking has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Enable Banking and On request for Lithic.
- Does Enable Banking or Lithic run on more platforms?
- Enable Banking runs on Web, REST API. Lithic runs on Web, API.
- Can I use Enable Banking for free?
- Yes. Enable Banking has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Lithic starts at On request.
- What is Enable Banking best used for?
- Enable Banking is most often used for a small fintech that needs to operate as an agent rather than wait a year for its own aisp authorisation, an accounting software vendor pulling bank transactions across several european countries, a treasury tool building and testing a real integration before committing to a contract, a lender verifying applicant income from bank data across the nordics and the eu. Of those, a small fintech that needs to operate as an agent rather than wait a year for its own aisp authorisation and an accounting software vendor pulling bank transactions across several european countries are not what Lithic is typically brought in for.
- What can Enable Banking do that Lithic cannot?
- Enable Banking covers European bank coverage, Free sandbox, Restricted production, TPP infrastructure as a service. Lithic covers Direct network connections, Processor Client mode, Lithic Program Management, Card lifecycle APIs.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Enable Banking: Is there really a free tier?
Yes, sandbox plus restricted production against accounts you link yourself. Commercial third-party access is quoted separately.
Lithic: Does Lithic publish pricing?
No, pricing is volume-based and requires a sales conversation.
Enable Banking: Do I need my own AISP licence?
No. Enable Banking offers third-party provider infrastructure as a service so you can operate as an agent under its authorisation.
Lithic: What is the difference between Processor Client and Program Management?
Processor Client suits companies with their own issuing licence and bank relationships; Program Management is for companies wanting Lithic to coordinate those relationships on their behalf.
Enable Banking: How is production priced?
By connected accounts per month and call volume, adjusted for markets in scope and whether you use your own licence.
Lithic: Which networks does it connect to?
Visa, Mastercard and American Express directly.
Related pages
More on Enable Banking
Other head to heads
- Enable Banking vs Salt Edge
- Enable Banking vs Tink
- Enable Banking vs TrueLayer
- Enable Banking vs Ozone API
- Enable Banking vs Token.io
- Enable Banking vs Neonomics
- Enable Banking vs Method Financial
- Enable Banking vs Yapily
- Enable Banking vs MX Technologies
- Enable Banking vs Yodlee
- Enable Banking vs Enfuce
- Enable Banking vs Bud Financial
- Enable Banking vs Treasury Prime
- Enable Banking vs 10x Banking
- Enable Banking vs Brite Payments
- Enable Banking vs Bruno
- Enable Banking vs Thredd
- Enable Banking vs Tribe Payments
- Enable Banking vs Unit
- Enable Banking vs Highnote
- Enable Banking vs Vodeno
- Enable Banking vs Swan
- Enable Banking vs Marqeta
- Enable Banking vs Synctera
- Enable Banking vs Weavr
- Enable Banking vs Increase
- Enable Banking vs i2c
- Enable Banking vs Episode Six
- Enable Banking vs Kong Gateway
- Lithic vs Salt Edge
- Lithic vs Tink
- Lithic vs TrueLayer
- Lithic vs Ozone API
- Lithic vs Token.io
- Lithic vs Neonomics
- Lithic vs Method Financial
- Lithic vs Yapily
- Lithic vs MX Technologies
- Lithic vs Yodlee
- Lithic vs Enfuce
- Lithic vs Bud Financial
- Lithic vs Treasury Prime
- Lithic vs 10x Banking
- Lithic vs Brite Payments
- Lithic vs Bruno
- Lithic vs Thredd
- Lithic vs Tribe Payments
- Lithic vs Unit
- Lithic vs Highnote
- Lithic vs Vodeno
- Lithic vs Swan
- Lithic vs Marqeta
- Lithic vs Synctera
- Lithic vs Weavr
- Lithic vs Increase
- Lithic vs i2c
- Lithic vs Episode Six
- Lithic vs Kong Gateway
