Softwr

LMS · head to head

Thought Industries vs Tovuti LMS

Thought Industries logo

Thought Industries

LMS

External learning platform for companies that sell training to customers and partners as a product

From
On request
Rated
-
Tovuti LMS logo

Tovuti LMS

LMS

Learning management with interactive content authoring built in rather than bought separately

From
On request
Rated
-

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Thought Industries the annual floor is an enterprise number, so organisations with modest training revenue pay more in platform fees than a revenue share would have cost them.; Tovuti LMS the bundled authoring saving only exists if you do not already own an authoring suite, and organisations that do are paying a premium for a capability their designers will not adopt.
  • They diverge on capability: Thought Industries covers Commerce engine, Tovuti LMS covers Built-in interactive authoring.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Thought Industries and Tovuti LMS actually diverge.

Attributes where Thought Industries and Tovuti LMS differ
AttributeThought IndustriesTovuti LMS

Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), platforms (Web, iOS, Android), user rating (Not yet rated), category (LMS).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Thought Industries

  • Commerce engine
  • Licence and seat management
  • Multi-tenant panorama delivery
  • Certification programmes
  • Learning path personalisation
  • Analytics on revenue and consumption

Only in Tovuti LMS

  • Built-in interactive authoring
  • Virtual classroom
  • Checklists and observations
  • Ecommerce and membership
  • Certification management
  • Multiple learner portals

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Thought Industries

  • A software company whose customer certification programme has grown past what a creator platform can administernot Tovuti LMS
  • Professional bodies selling continuing education with certification renewal cyclesnot Tovuti LMS
  • Manufacturers training distributor and dealer networks who each need their own branded environmentnot Tovuti LMS
  • Any training business where a percentage of revenue model has become more expensive than a flat platform feenot Tovuti LMS

Tovuti LMS

  • A training team that would otherwise buy both a learning platform and per seat authoring licencesnot Thought Industries
  • Associations selling continuing education to members and needing commerce, delivery and certificates togethernot Thought Industries
  • Organisations needing assessor sign off for practical competence alongside online modulesnot Thought Industries
  • Replacing a legacy system where course content must be rebuilt anyway, so built in authoring is used from day onenot Thought Industries

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Thought Industries

  • The annual floor is an enterprise number, so organisations with modest training revenue pay more in platform fees than a revenue share would have cost them.
  • Implementation is measured in months and needs an internal owner, so the platform sits unused and paid for during a slow rollout.
  • It is designed for external audiences, so using it for internal employee compliance training means paying for commerce and multi-tenancy capability that internal training does not need.
  • Configuration depth for commerce and tenancy means the administrator role is a real job, and organisations that assign it as a fraction of someone else's role underuse the system.
  • Content authoring is not the strength, so most customers pair it with a separate authoring tool and manage two vendors and two content workflows.

Tovuti LMS

  • The bundled authoring saving only exists if you do not already own an authoring suite, and organisations that do are paying a premium for a capability their designers will not adopt.
  • The built in editor is convenient rather than equal to a dedicated authoring tool, so complex simulations and software training content still need an external product.
  • Reporting is serviceable for completion and certification and shallow for skills analytics, so data heavy learning teams add a separate analytics layer.
  • Permissions and hierarchy modelling are lighter than enterprise competitors, which shows up in organisations with many semi autonomous business units.
  • Support and professional services capacity is smaller than at the large vendors, so complex implementations depend more on the customer having a capable internal owner.

Pricing, plan by plan

Thought Industries

On request
  • Thought Industries$undefined/year
    • Annual platform fee, quoted
    • No percentage taken of course revenue
    • Implementation and success services quoted separately

Tovuti LMS

On request
  • Tovuti LMS$undefined/year
    • Quoted by learner volume and modules
    • Annual contracts with implementation fee
    • Interactive authoring included rather than licensed separately

Which should you pick?

Choose Thought Industries if

  • You need commerce engine.
  • You work on Web, iOS, Android.
  • You also want licence and seat management.

Choose Tovuti LMS if

  • You need built-in interactive authoring.
  • You work on Web, iOS, Android.
  • You also want virtual classroom.

Questions people ask

Is Thought Industries or Tovuti LMS better?
Neither clearly leads. Thought Industries starts at On request and Tovuti LMS at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Thought Industries or Tovuti LMS?
Thought Industries starts at On request and Tovuti LMS at On request.
Does Thought Industries or Tovuti LMS run on more platforms?
Both run on Web, iOS, Android, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
What is Thought Industries best used for?
Thought Industries is most often used for a software company whose customer certification programme has grown past what a creator platform can administer, professional bodies selling continuing education with certification renewal cycles, manufacturers training distributor and dealer networks who each need their own branded environment, any training business where a percentage of revenue model has become more expensive than a flat platform fee. Of those, a software company whose customer certification programme has grown past what a creator platform can administer and professional bodies selling continuing education with certification renewal cycles are not what Tovuti LMS is typically brought in for.
What can Thought Industries do that Tovuti LMS cannot?
Thought Industries covers Commerce engine, Licence and seat management, Multi-tenant panorama delivery, Certification programmes. Tovuti LMS covers Built-in interactive authoring, Virtual classroom, Checklists and observations, Ecommerce and membership.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Thought Industries: Does Thought Industries take a percentage of course sales?

No. It charges an annual platform fee. That is more expensive than a revenue share at low volume and considerably cheaper once training revenue grows.

Tovuti LMS: Do we still need an authoring tool?

For most standard modules, no, the built in editor covers it. For software simulations and complex interactions you will still want a dedicated authoring product.

Thought Industries: Can one platform serve several corporate customers separately?

Yes. Multi-tenant delivery gives each business customer its own branded environment and administrator while content stays centrally managed.

Tovuti LMS: How is it priced?

Quoted by learner volume and the modules taken, with an implementation fee. It is not published, so compare it against per active user competitors using your own population model.

Thought Industries: Is it suitable for internal employee training?

It can do it, but you would be paying for commerce and tenancy features that internal compliance training does not use. A corporate learning platform is usually the better fit.

Tovuti LMS: Is it suitable for external customer training?

Yes. It supports separately branded portals and ecommerce, which is why associations and training providers use it as often as internal learning and development teams.

Share

Related pages

Other head to heads