APIs · head to head
Temenos Transact vs Toqio

Temenos Transact
APIs
Established core banking system used by banks in over a hundred countries
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Toqio
APIs
No code platform for building embedded finance products on your own providers
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Temenos Transact the codebase originates in the 1990s, so banks on older releases face major upgrade programmes to reach current versions, and many defer them for years.; Toqio toqio holds no licence and provides no sponsor bank, so you must find, contract and manage regulated providers yourself, which is the slowest part of any embedded finance launch.
- They diverge on capability: Temenos Transact covers Country model banks, Toqio covers No code product builder.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Temenos Transact and Toqio actually diverge.
| Attribute | Temenos Transact | Toqio |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Web, Linux, Windows, REST API | Web, iOS, Android, API |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (APIs).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Temenos Transact
- Country model banks
- Multi-product core
- Payments processing
- API layer
- Cloud deployment
- Accounting engine
Only in Toqio
- No code product builder
- Provider orchestration
- Account and card modules
- Embedded financing
- Back office tooling
- Multi entity and multi brand
- White label mobile apps
- Marketplace of providers
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Temenos Transact
- A bank in an emerging market needing local regulatory compliance without building it from scratchnot Toqio
- An institution running Islamic banking products alongside conventional ones on one corenot Toqio
- A bank that needs a large pool of experienced implementation consultants to de-risk a migrationnot Toqio
- A group standardising subsidiaries in several countries onto one core banking systemnot Toqio
Toqio
- A manufacturer offering branded working capital finance to its dealer networknot Temenos Transact
- A B2B marketplace launching accounts and cards for its sellers without becoming regulated itselfnot Temenos Transact
- A corporate that wants to switch card issuer without rebuilding its customer facing productnot Temenos Transact
- A group launching the same embedded finance product across several markets with different local providersnot Temenos Transact
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Temenos Transact
- The codebase originates in the 1990s, so banks on older releases face major upgrade programmes to reach current versions, and many defer them for years.
- Total cost is dominated by implementation partner fees rather than licence, and those programmes routinely overrun their original estimates.
- Product changes that cloud-native cores treat as configuration can require development work and a release cycle, which slows time to market for new products.
- Heavy customisation is common and it makes every subsequent upgrade harder, creating a compounding cost that banks feel a decade after go-live.
- Temenos has repeatedly restructured its product line and naming, so buyers must check carefully which components a proposal actually includes and which are separately licensed.
Toqio
- Toqio holds no licence and provides no sponsor bank, so you must find, contract and manage regulated providers yourself, which is the slowest part of any embedded finance launch.
- Because it orchestrates rather than provides, the customer experience is only as good as the underlying bank or issuer, and Toqio cannot fix a partner's settlement delays or outages.
- Pricing is quoted with no public rate card, so comparing it against building in house or against a bundled banking as a service provider requires a full sales process.
- With around EUR 30 million raised in total it is a small supplier to underpin a financial product a large corporate expects to run for a decade, which raises real continuity questions in procurement.
- No code configuration covers standard patterns well but bespoke customer journeys eventually require custom development, at which point the main advantage over building directly on provider APIs narrows.
Pricing, plan by plan
Temenos Transact
On request- Temenos Transact$undefined/year
- Perpetual or subscription licence scaled by assets, accounts or users
- Annual maintenance typically a percentage of licence value
- Implementation delivered by partners and charged separately
Toqio
On request- Toqio platform$undefined/year
- Quoted per customer, typically setup plus recurring platform fee
- Regulated provider fees are separate and contracted by you
- Card interchange and lending economics belong to your provider agreements
Which should you pick?
Choose Temenos Transact if
- You need country model banks.
- You work on Web, Linux, Windows, REST API.
- You also want multi-product core.
Choose Toqio if
- You need no code product builder.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, API.
- You also want provider orchestration.
Questions people ask
- Is Temenos Transact or Toqio better?
- Neither clearly leads. Temenos Transact starts at On request and Toqio at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Temenos Transact or Toqio?
- Temenos Transact starts at On request and Toqio at On request.
- Does Temenos Transact or Toqio run on more platforms?
- Temenos Transact runs on Web, Linux, Windows, REST API. Toqio runs on Web, iOS, Android, API.
- What is Temenos Transact best used for?
- Temenos Transact is most often used for a bank in an emerging market needing local regulatory compliance without building it from scratch, an institution running islamic banking products alongside conventional ones on one core, a bank that needs a large pool of experienced implementation consultants to de-risk a migration, a group standardising subsidiaries in several countries onto one core banking system. Of those, a bank in an emerging market needing local regulatory compliance without building it from scratch and an institution running islamic banking products alongside conventional ones on one core are not what Toqio is typically brought in for.
- What can Temenos Transact do that Toqio cannot?
- Temenos Transact covers Country model banks, Multi-product core, Payments processing, API layer. Toqio covers No code product builder, Provider orchestration, Account and card modules, Embedded financing.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Temenos Transact: Is Transact the same as T24?
Yes. T24 was renamed Temenos Transact; older installations and much of the consultant population still use the T24 name.
Toqio: Does Toqio provide the banking licence?
No, deliberately. You contract your own bank, issuer or lender, which is why you can replace them without rebuilding the product.
Temenos Transact: Can it run in the cloud?
Yes, it is offered on public cloud, though many existing installations remain on-premises and moving them is a project.
Toqio: Who is it aimed at?
Large corporates and B2B ecosystem operators embedding finance for suppliers, dealers or marketplace sellers, not consumer fintech startups.
Temenos Transact: What drives the cost?
Licence scaled by size, annual maintenance as a percentage of licence, and implementation partner fees that usually exceed the software cost.
Toqio: How much does it cost?
Not published. Expect a setup fee plus a recurring platform fee, with all regulated provider costs on top and separately contracted.
Related pages
More on Temenos Transact
Other head to heads
- Temenos Transact vs 10x Banking
- Temenos Transact vs Skaleet
- Temenos Transact vs Q2 Digital Banking
- Temenos Transact vs Ozone API
- Temenos Transact vs Mambu
- Temenos Transact vs Tuum
- Temenos Transact vs i2c
- Temenos Transact vs Apigee
- Temenos Transact vs Kong
- Temenos Transact vs WSO2 API Manager
- Temenos Transact vs 3scale
- Temenos Transact vs Akana
- Temenos Transact vs Vodeno
- Temenos Transact vs Weavr
- Temenos Transact vs Apollo GraphQL
- Temenos Transact vs Backendless
- Temenos Transact vs Convoy
- Temenos Transact vs Directus
- Temenos Transact vs Highnote
- Temenos Transact vs Unit
- Temenos Transact vs Solaris
- Temenos Transact vs Thredd
- Temenos Transact vs Swan
- Temenos Transact vs Fintech Farm
- Temenos Transact vs Lithic
- Temenos Transact vs Column
- Temenos Transact vs Synctera
- Temenos Transact vs Astra
- Temenos Transact vs Marqeta
- Temenos Transact vs Meniga
- Temenos Transact vs Moov
- Temenos Transact vs MX Technologies
- Temenos Transact vs PubNub
- Toqio vs 10x Banking
- Toqio vs Skaleet
- Toqio vs Q2 Digital Banking
- Toqio vs Ozone API
- Toqio vs Mambu
- Toqio vs Tuum
- Toqio vs i2c
- Toqio vs Apigee
- Toqio vs Kong
- Toqio vs WSO2 API Manager
- Toqio vs 3scale
- Toqio vs Akana
- Toqio vs Vodeno
- Toqio vs Weavr
- Toqio vs Apollo GraphQL
- Toqio vs Backendless
- Toqio vs Convoy
- Toqio vs Directus
- Toqio vs Highnote
- Toqio vs Unit
- Toqio vs Solaris
- Toqio vs Thredd
- Toqio vs Swan
- Toqio vs Fintech Farm
- Toqio vs Lithic
- Toqio vs Column
- Toqio vs Synctera
- Toqio vs Astra
- Toqio vs Marqeta
- Toqio vs Meniga
- Toqio vs Moov
- Toqio vs MX Technologies
- Toqio vs PubNub
