Cybersecurity · head to head
iDenfy vs Teleport

iDenfy
Cybersecurity
Identity verification and AML screening bundled into a single per-verification price
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Teleport
Cybersecurity
Certificate-based access to servers, Kubernetes, databases and apps, replacing shared credentials and VPNs
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: iDenfy rates are quoted rather than published on an accessible page, so despite the marketing emphasis on transparency you still need a sales conversation to get a number.; Teleport pricing is not published and is described as active users plus protected resources, so an autoscaling estate cannot forecast the bill and finance teams discover the true cost only after the first true-up.
- They diverge on capability: iDenfy covers Document verification, Teleport covers Short-lived certificates.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which iDenfy and Teleport actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in iDenfy
- Document verification
- Human review on all cases
- AML screening
- Business verification
- Proof of address
- NFC chip reading
Only in Teleport
- Short-lived certificates
- Protocol coverage
- Session recording and replay
- Access Requests
- Device Trust
- Identity provider integration
- Machine identity
- FIPS and FedRAMP builds
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
iDenfy
- A European fintech that needs KYC and AML screening and wants one price rather than four line itemsnot Teleport
- A gambling operator in a regulated EU market needing age and identity assurance with EU data processingnot Teleport
- A crypto platform with modest volume that cannot meet the minimum commitments larger vendors requirenot Teleport
- A marketplace wanting NFC passport chip reading for higher assurance without an enterprise contractnot Teleport
Teleport
- Removing long-lived SSH keys and shared database passwords so that offboarding an engineer takes one action in the identity providernot iDenfy
- Producing session recordings and per-user database audit trails as direct evidence for SOC 2 or FedRAMPnot iDenfy
- Giving contractors or on-call engineers time-boxed, approved access to production instead of standing admin rightsnot iDenfy
- Replacing a flat VPN with per-resource authorisation across servers, Kubernetes and internal web appsnot iDenfy
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
iDenfy
- Rates are quoted rather than published on an accessible page, so despite the marketing emphasis on transparency you still need a sales conversation to get a number.
- It is a smaller vendor than the market leaders, which makes it a harder sell through enterprise vendor-risk review even when the product performs well.
- Human review on every case caps throughput in a way fully automated competitors are not constrained by, which shows up as latency during volume spikes.
- Coverage and accuracy are strongest on European documents; performance on some Asian, African and Latin American document types trails specialists in those regions.
- The bundled AML screening uses its chosen data sources, so institutions mandated to use a specific list provider such as Dow Jones cannot substitute it and end up paying twice.
Teleport
- Pricing is not published and is described as active users plus protected resources, so an autoscaling estate cannot forecast the bill and finance teams discover the true cost only after the first true-up.
- The proxy is a hard dependency on reaching production, so it needs its own high availability deployment and a tested break-glass path or an outage in Teleport becomes an outage in your ability to respond to outages.
- The open source Community Edition omits Access Requests, Device Trust and the FIPS builds, which are exactly the controls an auditor asks about, so the free tier rarely survives a compliance review.
- Self-hosting means running and upgrading a certificate authority and its backing store, and Teleport releases frequently enough that upgrade work becomes a standing operational commitment.
- Coverage across protocols is uneven in depth, so teams with legacy systems, unusual databases or bespoke network appliances find gaps that still require the old VPN to remain in place alongside it.
Pricing, plan by plan
iDenfy
On request- iDenfy Verification$undefined/verification
- Volume-tiered per-verification rates quoted on request
- AML screening bundled rather than charged per check
- No monthly minimum advertised
Teleport
On request- Teleport Community Edition$undefined/year
- Open source, self-hosted
- SSH, Kubernetes, database and app access
- Session recording
- Teleport Enterprise$undefined/year
- Cloud-hosted or self-hosted
- Access Requests and approval workflow
- Device Trust and hardware key enforcement
Which should you pick?
Choose iDenfy if
- You need document verification.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, API.
- You also want human review on all cases.
Choose Teleport if
- You need short-lived certificates.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Kubernetes, Cloud.
- You also want protocol coverage.
Questions people ask
- Is iDenfy or Teleport better?
- Neither clearly leads. iDenfy starts at On request and Teleport at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, iDenfy or Teleport?
- iDenfy starts at On request and Teleport at On request.
- Does iDenfy or Teleport run on more platforms?
- iDenfy runs on Web, iOS, Android, API. Teleport runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Kubernetes, Cloud.
- What is iDenfy best used for?
- iDenfy is most often used for a european fintech that needs kyc and aml screening and wants one price rather than four line items, a gambling operator in a regulated eu market needing age and identity assurance with eu data processing, a crypto platform with modest volume that cannot meet the minimum commitments larger vendors require, a marketplace wanting nfc passport chip reading for higher assurance without an enterprise contract. Of those, a european fintech that needs kyc and aml screening and wants one price rather than four line items and a gambling operator in a regulated eu market needing age and identity assurance with eu data processing are not what Teleport is typically brought in for.
- What can iDenfy do that Teleport cannot?
- iDenfy covers Document verification, Human review on all cases, AML screening, Business verification. Teleport covers Short-lived certificates, Protocol coverage, Session recording and replay, Access Requests.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
iDenfy: Is AML screening included in the verification price?
That is the pitch, screening bundled rather than sold as a per-check add-on. Confirm which sanctions and PEP data sources are behind it before you rely on it.
Teleport: Is the open source edition usable in production?
Yes, but it lacks Access Requests, Device Trust and FIPS builds, which most compliance programmes end up requiring.
iDenfy: Is there a monthly minimum?
iDenfy markets itself as having no monthly minimum, in contrast to competitors charging $49 to $299 a month. Get that in writing in the contract.
Teleport: How is it priced?
Not publicly. The vendor prices on active users and protected resources and provides a quote after a sales conversation.
iDenfy: Where is data processed?
iDenfy is established in Lithuania and processes in the EU, which simplifies GDPR transfer assessments compared with United States-headquartered vendors.
Teleport: What happens if Teleport goes down?
Nobody reaches the resources behind it, so you need a highly available deployment and a documented break-glass procedure.
Teleport: Does it replace our VPN?
For anything you put behind it, yes. Legacy systems and appliances it does not support will keep the VPN alive.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- iDenfy vs Veriff
- iDenfy vs IDnow
- iDenfy vs Yoti
- iDenfy vs Sumsub
- iDenfy vs Jumio
- iDenfy vs Shufti Pro
- iDenfy vs Trulioo
- iDenfy vs Socure
- iDenfy vs Fenergo
- iDenfy vs Quantexa
- iDenfy vs NICE Actimize
- iDenfy vs Sardine
- iDenfy vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- iDenfy vs VMware Carbon Black
- iDenfy vs Wireshark
- iDenfy vs WorkOS
- iDenfy vs Zscaler Internet Access
- iDenfy vs Milestone XProtect
- iDenfy vs JumpCloud
- iDenfy vs HashiCorp Vault
- iDenfy vs HashiCorp Boundary
- iDenfy vs Beyond Identity
- iDenfy vs Falco
- iDenfy vs Delinea
- iDenfy vs Sysdig
- iDenfy vs BeyondTrust
- iDenfy vs One Identity
- iDenfy vs Doppler
- iDenfy vs Infisical
- iDenfy vs Akeyless
- iDenfy vs DataGrail
- iDenfy vs Envysion
- iDenfy vs Feedzai
- Teleport vs Veriff
- Teleport vs IDnow
- Teleport vs Yoti
- Teleport vs Sumsub
- Teleport vs Jumio
- Teleport vs Shufti Pro
- Teleport vs Trulioo
- Teleport vs Socure
- Teleport vs Fenergo
- Teleport vs Quantexa
- Teleport vs NICE Actimize
- Teleport vs Sardine
- Teleport vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Teleport vs VMware Carbon Black
- Teleport vs Wireshark
- Teleport vs WorkOS
- Teleport vs Zscaler Internet Access
- Teleport vs Milestone XProtect
- Teleport vs JumpCloud
- Teleport vs HashiCorp Vault
- Teleport vs HashiCorp Boundary
- Teleport vs Beyond Identity
- Teleport vs Falco
- Teleport vs Delinea
- Teleport vs Sysdig
- Teleport vs BeyondTrust
- Teleport vs One Identity
- Teleport vs Doppler
- Teleport vs Infisical
- Teleport vs Akeyless
- Teleport vs DataGrail
- Teleport vs Envysion
- Teleport vs Feedzai
