Software · head to head
TeamCity vs Jenkins

TeamCity
Software
JetBrains continuous integration and delivery server
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: TeamCity detailed pricing requires visiting a calculator and isn't transparent on the main pricing page.; Jenkins described by the vendor as the leading open source automation server and a community-driven project, with no commercial edition or license fee
- They diverge on capability: TeamCity covers Build Chains, Jenkins covers Continuous integration.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which TeamCity and Jenkins actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in TeamCity
- Build Chains
- Parallel Test Execution
- VCS Integration
- Build History & Analytics
- Docker & Kubernetes Support
- Access Control
Only in Jenkins
- Continuous integration
- Continuous delivery
- Pipeline as code
- Distributed builds
- Plugin ecosystem
- REST API
- CLI tools
- Build triggers
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
TeamCity
- Running build and test pipelines for enterprise software teamsnot Jenkins
- Self-hosting CI/CD infrastructure behind a firewallnot Jenkins
- Coordinating multi-stage build chains with dependenciesnot Jenkins
- Scaling build capacity with additional agentsnot Jenkins
Jenkins
- CI/CD pipelinesnot TeamCity
- Automated testingnot TeamCity
- Build automationnot TeamCity
- Deployment automationnot TeamCity
- Infrastructure as codenot TeamCity
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
TeamCity
- Detailed pricing requires visiting a calculator and isn't transparent on the main pricing page.
- Self-hosted setup and agent management require more operational overhead than fully managed CI/CD services.
- Additional build agents and users are priced incrementally, which can add up for larger teams.
- The UI and configuration model have a steeper learning curve compared to YAML-first CI tools.
Jenkins
- Described by the vendor as the leading open source automation server and a community-driven project, with no commercial edition or license fee
Pricing, plan by plan
TeamCity
Free- Free TierFree
- Includes 3 build agents
- 100 build configurations
- On-premises or Cloud
- TeamCity Cloud / On-Premises$undefined/month
- Priced per additional build agent
- Additional users on Cloud plans
- Enterprise support options
Jenkins
Free- Open SourceFree
- Unlimited builds
- 1000+ plugins
- Self-hosted
- CloudBees CI$undefined/month
- Enterprise features
- High availability
- Role-based access
Which should you pick?
Choose TeamCity if
- You need build chains.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on web, windows, mac, linux, api.
- You also want parallel test execution.
Choose Jenkins if
- You need continuous integration.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, Macos, Docker.
- You also want continuous delivery.
Questions people ask
- Is TeamCity or Jenkins better?
- Neither clearly leads. TeamCity starts at Free and Jenkins at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, TeamCity or Jenkins?
- TeamCity starts at Free and Jenkins at Free.
- Does TeamCity or Jenkins run on more platforms?
- TeamCity runs on web, windows, mac, linux, api. Jenkins runs on Linux, Windows, Macos, Docker.
- Can I use TeamCity for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is TeamCity best used for?
- TeamCity is most often used for running build and test pipelines for enterprise software teams, self-hosting ci/cd infrastructure behind a firewall, coordinating multi-stage build chains with dependencies, scaling build capacity with additional agents. Of those, running build and test pipelines for enterprise software teams and self-hosting ci/cd infrastructure behind a firewall are not what Jenkins is typically brought in for.
- What can TeamCity do that Jenkins cannot?
- TeamCity covers Build Chains, Parallel Test Execution, VCS Integration, Build History & Analytics. Jenkins covers Continuous integration, Continuous delivery, Pipeline as code, Distributed builds.
Related pages
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- TeamCity vs Cursor
- TeamCity vs Windsurf
- TeamCity vs Zed
- TeamCity vs Amp
- TeamCity vs Codacy
- TeamCity vs DeepSource
- TeamCity vs Augment Code
- TeamCity vs Drizzle ORM
- TeamCity vs Flagsmith
- TeamCity vs Unleash
- TeamCity vs Baseten
- TeamCity vs Braintrust
- TeamCity vs Bun
- TeamCity vs Cline
- TeamCity vs Devin
- TeamCity vs Factory
- TeamCity vs Humanloop
- TeamCity vs Langfuse
- TeamCity vs Asana
- TeamCity vs ClickUp
- TeamCity vs Linear
- TeamCity vs Figma
- TeamCity vs Notion
- TeamCity vs Monday.com
- TeamCity vs Greenhouse
- TeamCity vs PostHog
- TeamCity vs Amplitude
- TeamCity vs Datadog
- TeamCity vs Okta
- TeamCity vs PyCharm
- TeamCity vs Sketch
- TeamCity vs Sublime Text
- TeamCity vs Auth0
- TeamCity vs Dashlane
- TeamCity vs Docker
- TeamCity vs LaunchDarkly
- Jenkins vs Cursor
- Jenkins vs Windsurf
- Jenkins vs Zed
- Jenkins vs Amp
- Jenkins vs Codacy
- Jenkins vs DeepSource
- Jenkins vs Augment Code
- Jenkins vs Drizzle ORM
- Jenkins vs Flagsmith
- Jenkins vs Unleash
- Jenkins vs Baseten
- Jenkins vs Braintrust
- Jenkins vs Bun
- Jenkins vs Cline
- Jenkins vs Devin
- Jenkins vs Factory
- Jenkins vs Humanloop
- Jenkins vs Langfuse
- Jenkins vs Asana
- Jenkins vs ClickUp
- Jenkins vs Linear
- Jenkins vs Figma
- Jenkins vs Notion
- Jenkins vs Monday.com
- Jenkins vs Greenhouse
- Jenkins vs PostHog
- Jenkins vs Amplitude
- Jenkins vs Datadog
- Jenkins vs Okta
- Jenkins vs PyCharm
- Jenkins vs Sketch
- Jenkins vs Sublime Text
- Jenkins vs Auth0
- Jenkins vs Dashlane
- Jenkins vs Docker
- Jenkins vs LaunchDarkly

