Dental · head to head
tab32 vs Visage Imaging

Visage Imaging
Healthcare
Server-side streaming PACS built for radiologists reading very large studies over thin connections
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: tab32 the $125 a month Alpine start up rate applies to year one only and rises to $225 a month from year two; Visage Imaging pricing is per exam against a minimum annual volume, so an organisation whose imaging activity is flat pays a floor while a growing one sees the software line rise every year rather than amortise.
- They diverge on capability: tab32 covers AI-powered insights, Visage Imaging covers Server-side rendering.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which tab32 and Visage Imaging actually diverge.
| Attribute | tab32 | Visage Imaging |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $299/month | On request |
| Pricing model | subscription | quote |
| Platforms | Web, Ios, Android | Windows, macOS, Web, iOS, Cloud |
| Category | Dental | Healthcare |
| Founded | 2012 | Unknown |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in tab32
- AI-powered insights
- Cloud-based platform
- Patient scheduling
- Clinical charting
- Revenue cycle management
- Patient engagement
- Business analytics
- Imaging integration
Only in Visage Imaging
- Server-side rendering
- One Viewer
- Native multi-dimensional tools
- Digital breast tomosynthesis reading
- Open archive
- Cloud PACS operations
- AI accelerator
- On the fly patient jacket
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
tab32
- Cloud dental practice management and imaging for small practicesnot Visage Imaging
- Insurance claim submission, attachments and eligibility verificationnot Visage Imaging
- Multi location reporting and analytics for dental groups and DSOsnot Visage Imaging
Visage Imaging
- An academic health system whose radiologists read from home and cannot tolerate a thousand slice CT taking minutes to opennot tab32
- A breast imaging service moving to tomosynthesis where study sizes have made the existing PACS unusable at volumenot tab32
- A teleradiology group covering many client sites that needs one viewer rather than a client-specific workstation per contractnot tab32
- A health system mid migration that needs priors from three legacy archives assembled into one patient jacket before the data move finishesnot tab32
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
tab32
- The $125 a month Alpine start up rate applies to year one only and rises to $225 a month from year two
- The entry tier covers up to 3 providers and the established tier up to 5, so larger practices move up
- Claims and eligibility work are billed per transaction: $0.20 per claim, $0.50 per attachment and $1.25 per eligibility check
- Patient engagement features such as texting, reminders and online booking are paid add ons
- Summit, the tier for groups and DSOs, is custom priced with no published rate
Visage Imaging
- Pricing is per exam against a minimum annual volume, so an organisation whose imaging activity is flat pays a floor while a growing one sees the software line rise every year rather than amortise.
- Module breadth outside radiology is narrower than at Sectra or the large modality vendors, so a group planning to digitise pathology on the same platform will not find it here.
- Server-side rendering shifts the cost to central infrastructure, so the saving on radiologist workstations is partly offset by what you spend on servers or cloud compute.
- Pro Medicus concentrates on very large contracts, and smaller imaging groups report long sales cycles and little appetite from the vendor for deals below a certain volume.
- Diagnostic AI is third party, surfaced through the accelerator framework rather than developed in house, so algorithm licensing, validation and monitoring remain the buyer problem.
Pricing, plan by plan
tab32
$299/month- Starter$299/month
- Cloud-based platform
- Patient scheduling
- Clinical charting
- Professional$449/month
- Everything in Starter
- Advanced AI analytics
- Patient engagement tools
- EnterpriseFree
- Everything in Professional
- Multi-location management
- Custom integrations
Visage Imaging
On request- Visage 7 enterprise contract$undefined/year
- Transaction pricing per exam with a minimum annual volume commitment
- Seven to ten year terms typical for health system contracts
- Contract totals for major deals are disclosed by Pro Medicus to the ASX
Which should you pick?
Choose tab32 if
- You need ai-powered insights.
- You work on Web, Ios, Android.
- You also want cloud-based platform.
Choose Visage Imaging if
- You need server-side rendering.
- You work on Windows, macOS, Web, iOS, Cloud.
- You also want one viewer.
Questions people ask
- Is tab32 or Visage Imaging better?
- Neither clearly leads. tab32 starts at $299/month and Visage Imaging at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, tab32 or Visage Imaging?
- tab32 starts at $299/month and Visage Imaging at On request.
- Does tab32 or Visage Imaging run on more platforms?
- tab32 runs on Web, Ios, Android. Visage Imaging runs on Windows, macOS, Web, iOS, Cloud.
- What is tab32 best used for?
- tab32 is most often used for cloud dental practice management and imaging for small practices, insurance claim submission, attachments and eligibility verification, multi location reporting and analytics for dental groups and dsos. Of those, cloud dental practice management and imaging for small practices and insurance claim submission, attachments and eligibility verification are not what Visage Imaging is typically brought in for.
- What can tab32 do that Visage Imaging cannot?
- tab32 covers AI-powered insights, Cloud-based platform, Patient scheduling, Clinical charting. Visage Imaging covers Server-side rendering, One Viewer, Native multi-dimensional tools, Digital breast tomosynthesis reading.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
tab32: How much does tab32 cost?
tab32 Alpine costs $125 per month for the first year (Start-Up tier with 3 providers) and $225 per month for subsequent years (Established Practice tier with 5 providers). Summit plans are available with custom enterprise pricing.
SourceVisage Imaging: Who owns Visage Imaging?
Pro Medicus Limited, listed on the Australian Securities Exchange. That listing means major contract values and terms are publicly announced.
tab32: Does tab32 charge additional fees beyond the monthly subscription?
Yes, tab32 charges usage-based fees: $0.20 per claim processed, $0.50 per claim attachment, and $1.25 per insurance eligibility verification check. Patient engagement add-ons like text messaging are available separately.
SourceVisage Imaging: How is Visage priced?
Per exam, against a minimum annual volume, on multi-year terms. Because Pro Medicus discloses large contract totals and durations to the market, buyers can estimate a per exam rate before entering negotiation.
tab32: Does tab32 offer a free trial?
Yes, tab32 offers a 14-day free trial with no charges and the ability to cancel anytime.
SourceVisage Imaging: Is Visage 7 FDA cleared for diagnostic interpretation?
Yes, Visage 7 holds 510(k) clearance for diagnostic viewing including mammography and tomosynthesis on validated displays. Confirm the exact cleared modality list for your intended use.
Visage Imaging: Does it work as a full cloud PACS?
Yes, Visage 7 runs complete PACS operations in the cloud rather than cloud viewing over an on-premise archive.
Related pages
More on Visage Imaging
Other head to heads
- tab32 vs Dovetail Dental
- tab32 vs CareStack
- tab32 vs Curve Dental
- tab32 vs Dentally
- tab32 vs Eaglesoft
- tab32 vs Dental Intelligence
- tab32 vs DentalIntel
- tab32 vs DSO Analytics Hub
- tab32 vs Overjet
- tab32 vs Pearl
- tab32 vs Apteryx
- tab32 vs Denticon
- tab32 vs iDentalSoft
- tab32 vs Kleer
- tab32 vs Lighthouse 360
- tab32 vs MaxiDent
- tab32 vs Sectra
- tab32 vs Rad AI
- tab32 vs Epic Systems
- tab32 vs Fujifilm Synapse
- tab32 vs Philips IntelliSpace PACS
- tab32 vs Gleamer
- tab32 vs Annalise.ai
- tab32 vs OpenMRS
- tab32 vs Signant Health
- tab32 vs Ambra Health
- tab32 vs Aidoc
- tab32 vs Clue
- tab32 vs Allscripts
- tab32 vs Dentrix
- tab32 vs DHIS2
- tab32 vs Flo
- tab32 vs Epic MyChart
- Visage Imaging vs Dovetail Dental
- Visage Imaging vs CareStack
- Visage Imaging vs Curve Dental
- Visage Imaging vs Dentally
- Visage Imaging vs Eaglesoft
- Visage Imaging vs Dental Intelligence
- Visage Imaging vs DentalIntel
- Visage Imaging vs DSO Analytics Hub
- Visage Imaging vs Overjet
- Visage Imaging vs Pearl
- Visage Imaging vs Apteryx
- Visage Imaging vs Denticon
- Visage Imaging vs iDentalSoft
- Visage Imaging vs Kleer
- Visage Imaging vs Lighthouse 360
- Visage Imaging vs MaxiDent
- Visage Imaging vs Sectra
- Visage Imaging vs Rad AI
- Visage Imaging vs Epic Systems
- Visage Imaging vs Fujifilm Synapse
- Visage Imaging vs Philips IntelliSpace PACS
- Visage Imaging vs Gleamer
- Visage Imaging vs Annalise.ai
- Visage Imaging vs OpenMRS
- Visage Imaging vs Signant Health
- Visage Imaging vs Ambra Health
- Visage Imaging vs Aidoc
- Visage Imaging vs Clue
- Visage Imaging vs Allscripts
- Visage Imaging vs Dentrix
- Visage Imaging vs DHIS2
- Visage Imaging vs Flo
- Visage Imaging vs Epic MyChart

