Technology · head to head
Postgres vs TiDB

TiDB
Databases
Apache 2.0 distributed SQL database with MySQL wire compatibility and a separate columnar replica for analytical queries.
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Postgres each major version is supported for only 5 years after its initial release, after which it is end-of-life; TiDB a production cluster needs several placement driver, storage and SQL nodes before it is fault tolerant, so the minimum viable footprint is far larger than a MySQL server and TiDB is never the economical choice for a small database.
- They diverge on capability: Postgres covers ACID compliance, TiDB covers MySQL wire compatibility.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Postgres and TiDB actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Postgres
- ACID compliance
- Complex queries
- Foreign keys
- Triggers
- Views
- Stored procedures
- JSON/JSONB support
- Full-text search
Only in TiDB
- MySQL wire compatibility
- Horizontal write scaling
- Distributed ACID transactions
- TiFlash columnar replica
- Automatic rebalancing
- Raft replication
- Apache 2.0 licence
- Online schema change
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Postgres
- Running a general purpose relational database for applicationsnot TiDB
- Self-hosting an open source SQL database with no licence feenot TiDB
- Workloads needing extensions, JSON and full text search in one enginenot TiDB
TiDB
- A MySQL workload that has hit the write ceiling of a single primary and would otherwise need an application-level sharding layernot Postgres
- Reporting that must run against current transactional data, where the columnar replica removes the delay and the cost of an ETL pipelinenot Postgres
- Multi-region deployments needing a single logical database with automatic failover rather than manual primary promotionnot Postgres
- Migrating off a sharded MySQL estate where the sharding logic in the application has become the main source of bugs and operational toilnot Postgres
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Postgres
- Each major version is supported for only 5 years after its initial release, after which it is end-of-life
- Major version upgrades break on-disk compatibility and require a full dump and reload or the pg_upgrade tool
- New major versions ship about once a year, so staying supported means a disruptive upgrade cycle
- Minor releases contain only frequently-encountered bug fixes, low-risk fixes, security issues and data corruption fixes, so feature gaps are not addressed within a major version
- There is no vendor SLA; commercial support must be bought separately from third party professional services listed by the project
TiDB
- A production cluster needs several placement driver, storage and SQL nodes before it is fault tolerant, so the minimum viable footprint is far larger than a MySQL server and TiDB is never the economical choice for a small database.
- Every transaction takes a timestamp from the placement driver and crosses the network to storage nodes, so simple point queries are slower than on single-node MySQL and latency-sensitive paths need to be measured, not assumed.
- MySQL compatibility is at the wire and dialect level but not complete; stored procedures, triggers and events are not supported, so an application that pushed logic into the database cannot simply be repointed.
- The columnar replica is an extra full copy of the data on its own nodes, so hybrid analytics roughly doubles storage and adds hardware that must be sized and paid for separately.
- Operating it well requires cluster-specific expertise in TiUP or the Kubernetes operator, region hot spots, and rebalancing behaviour, so the licence is free but the running cost includes an engineer who understands distributed storage.
Pricing, plan by plan
Postgres
Free- Community EditionFree
- Full database features
- No limitations
- Community support
TiDB
Free- ServerlessFree
- 5GB storage
- 50M request units
- Free forever tier
- Dedicated$250/month
- Dedicated resources
- SLA guarantees
- Enterprise support
Which should you pick?
Choose Postgres if
- You need acid compliance.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, Macos, Docker.
- You also want complex queries.
Choose TiDB if
- You need mysql wire compatibility.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud, AWS, Azure, Google Cloud Platform, Self-managed.
- You also want horizontal write scaling.
Questions people ask
- Is Postgres or TiDB better?
- Neither clearly leads. Postgres starts at Free and TiDB at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Postgres or TiDB?
- Postgres starts at Free and TiDB at Free.
- Does Postgres or TiDB run on more platforms?
- Postgres runs on Linux, Windows, Macos, Docker. TiDB runs on Cloud, AWS, Azure, Google Cloud Platform, Self-managed.
- Can I use Postgres for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Postgres best used for?
- Postgres is most often used for running a general purpose relational database for applications, self-hosting an open source sql database with no licence fee, workloads needing extensions, json and full text search in one engine. Of those, running a general purpose relational database for applications and self-hosting an open source sql database with no licence fee are not what TiDB is typically brought in for.
- What can Postgres do that TiDB cannot?
- Postgres covers ACID compliance, Complex queries, Foreign keys, Triggers. TiDB covers MySQL wire compatibility, Horizontal write scaling, Distributed ACID transactions, TiFlash columnar replica.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Postgres: How much does PostgreSQL cost to use?
PostgreSQL is completely free to download, install, and use. No licensing fees, subscription costs, or per-seat charges apply. The database is open source under the PostgreSQL License. Source: https://www.postgresql.org
SourceTiDB: Is TiDB a drop-in replacement for MySQL?
At the protocol and dialect level it is close, and most applications connect unchanged. Stored procedures, triggers and events are not supported, and latency characteristics differ, so it needs testing rather than assumption.
Postgres: Are there commercial PostgreSQL support options available?
Official PostgreSQL (the project) is free. Commercial PostgreSQL services such as hosting, professional support, training, and managed database services are offered by third-party vendors, not the PostgreSQL project itself. Source: https://www.postgresql.org
SourceTiDB: What licence is it under?
Apache 2.0, for both TiDB and the underlying TiKV storage engine. TiKV is a graduated CNCF project, which is a meaningful governance signal in a market where several competitors moved to source-available licences.
Postgres: Do I need a license to use PostgreSQL commercially?
No. PostgreSQL is open source under the PostgreSQL License, which permits free commercial use without royalties, licensing fees, or support obligations. Source: https://www.postgresql.org
SourceTiDB: Do I need TiFlash?
Only for analytical queries. It is an optional columnar replica; without it TiDB is a distributed transactional database. With it you get analytics on live data at the cost of an additional full copy.
TiDB: Is the managed cloud the same software?
TiDB Cloud runs the same engine, with the control plane, scaling and operational tooling provided as a service. The entry tier is metered differently from a dedicated cluster, so the cost model rather than the engine is what changes.
TiDB: When is TiDB the wrong choice?
When the database is small enough for one server, when latency on single-row lookups is the primary constraint, or when the application depends on MySQL stored procedures and triggers.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Postgres vs Linear
- Postgres vs Asana
- Postgres vs ClickUp
- Postgres vs Figma
- Postgres vs Supabase
- Postgres vs Redis
- Postgres vs Aha!
- Postgres vs Eclipse
- Postgres vs Excalidraw
- Postgres vs MongoDB
- Postgres vs Okta
- Postgres vs Notion
- Postgres vs Close
- Postgres vs Coda
- Postgres vs Drift
- Postgres vs JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA
- Postgres vs LogRocket
- Postgres vs Neovim
- Postgres vs Cockroach Labs
- Postgres vs Vitess
- Postgres vs Elasticsearch
- Postgres vs SingleStore
- Postgres vs BigQuery
- Postgres vs DuckDB
- Postgres vs Amazon Redshift
- Postgres vs ClickHouse
- Postgres vs Apache Druid
- Postgres vs Couchbase
- Postgres vs MariaDB
- Postgres vs TimescaleDB
- Postgres vs Redpanda
- Postgres vs RisingWave
- Postgres vs ScyllaDB
- Postgres vs Solace PubSub+
- Postgres vs SQLite
- Postgres vs StarRocks
- TiDB vs Linear
- TiDB vs Asana
- TiDB vs ClickUp
- TiDB vs Figma
- TiDB vs Supabase
- TiDB vs Redis
- TiDB vs Aha!
- TiDB vs Eclipse
- TiDB vs Excalidraw
- TiDB vs MongoDB
- TiDB vs Okta
- TiDB vs Notion
- TiDB vs Close
- TiDB vs Coda
- TiDB vs Drift
- TiDB vs JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA
- TiDB vs LogRocket
- TiDB vs Neovim
- TiDB vs Cockroach Labs
- TiDB vs Vitess
- TiDB vs Elasticsearch
- TiDB vs SingleStore
- TiDB vs BigQuery
- TiDB vs DuckDB
- TiDB vs Amazon Redshift
- TiDB vs ClickHouse
- TiDB vs Apache Druid
- TiDB vs Couchbase
- TiDB vs MariaDB
- TiDB vs TimescaleDB
- TiDB vs Redpanda
- TiDB vs RisingWave
- TiDB vs ScyllaDB
- TiDB vs Solace PubSub+
- TiDB vs SQLite
- TiDB vs StarRocks

