Technology · head to head
Supabase vs Vitess

Vitess
Databases
Scalable database clustering system for horizontal scaling of MySQL
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Supabase free tier projects auto-pause after 1 week of inactivity; Vitess vTGate scatter queries without sharding key incur significant performance penalties
- They diverge on capability: Supabase covers PostgreSQL database, Vitess covers Horizontal Sharding.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Supabase and Vitess actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (Unknown), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Supabase
- PostgreSQL database
- Auto-generated APIs
- Authentication & authorization
- Real-time subscriptions
- Storage
- Edge functions
- Vector embeddings
- Database migrations
Only in Vitess
- Horizontal Sharding
- Connection Pooling
- Query Routing
- Online Schema Changes
- Shard Management
- Replication Management
- Automated Failover
- MySQL
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Supabase
- Web application backends using Postgres plus auto-generated REST/GraphQL APIsnot Vitess
- Mobile app backends via Flutter/Swift/Kotlin client librariesnot Vitess
- AI applications using vector/embeddings storagenot Vitess
- Authentication with 20+ social providers plus email/passwordnot Vitess
- File and media storage (S3-compatible with CDN) and realtime sync over WebSocketsnot Vitess
Vitess
- Transaction processingnot Supabase
- Data storagenot Supabase
- Application backendnot Supabase
- Reportingnot Supabase
- Data analyticsnot Supabase
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Supabase
- Free tier projects auto-pause after 1 week of inactivity
- Free tier hard caps: 500 MB database, 1 GB file storage, 5 GB egress/month, 50,000 monthly active users, max 2 active free projects per organization
- Pro plan charges usage overages beyond included quotas, e.g. $0.00325 per MAU above 100,000 and $0.125/GB disk above 8 GB
- SOC2/ISO 27001 certification and HIPAA (add-on) compliance require the $599/month Team plan; not available on the $25/month Pro plan
Vitess
- VTGate scatter queries without sharding key incur significant performance penalties
- Foreign key constraints not enforced across shards, requiring application-level integrity handling
- Single primary per keyspace limits multi-region write capabilities
- Distributed transactions without proper sharding key routing suffer performance degradation
Pricing, plan by plan
Supabase
Free- FreeFree
- 50,000 MAU
- 500MB database
- 5GB egress
- Pro$25/month
- 100,000 MAU
- 8GB disk
- 250GB egress
- Team$599/month
- SOC2 and ISO 27001
- HIPAA add-on
- 28-day log / 14-day backup retention
- Enterprise$undefined/month
- Custom limits
- Dedicated support manager
- 24/7/365 support
Vitess
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Vitess review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Supabase if
- You need postgresql database.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want auto-generated apis.
Choose Vitess if
- You need horizontal sharding.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Docker, Kubernetes.
- You also want connection pooling.
Questions people ask
- Is Supabase or Vitess better?
- Neither clearly leads. Supabase starts at Free and Vitess at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Supabase or Vitess?
- Supabase starts at Free and Vitess at Free.
- Does Supabase or Vitess run on more platforms?
- Supabase runs on Web, iOS, Android. Vitess runs on Linux, macOS, Docker, Kubernetes.
- Can I use Supabase for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Supabase best used for?
- Supabase is most often used for web application backends using postgres plus auto-generated rest/graphql apis, mobile app backends via flutter/swift/kotlin client libraries, ai applications using vector/embeddings storage, authentication with 20+ social providers plus email/password. Of those, web application backends using postgres plus auto-generated rest/graphql apis and mobile app backends via flutter/swift/kotlin client libraries are not what Vitess is typically brought in for.
- What can Supabase do that Vitess cannot?
- Supabase covers PostgreSQL database, Auto-generated APIs, Authentication & authorization, Real-time subscriptions. Vitess covers Horizontal Sharding, Connection Pooling, Query Routing, Online Schema Changes.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Supabase: How much does Supabase cost?
Supabase offers a free tier and three paid plans. Pro starts at $25 per month, Team at $599 per month, and Enterprise requires a custom quote. All pricing is in USD charged monthly.
SourceVitess: Is Vitess free to use?
Yes. Vitess is completely free and open source under the Apache 2.0 license. It is a graduated CNCF project with no licensing costs or pricing tiers.
SourceSupabase: What are Supabase's usage overage fees?
Pro plan users pay $0.00325 per monthly active user over the 100,000 included, and $0.125 per GB for database storage exceeding 8 GB per project. Compute instances cost $10 to $3,730+ per month.
SourceVitess: What databases does Vitess support?
Vitess supports MySQL and MariaDB as backend databases. It acts as a middleware layer that adds sharding and orchestration capabilities on top of these databases.
SourceVitess: Does Vitess require Kubernetes to run?
No. Vitess can run on Kubernetes using the Vitess Operator, but it can also be deployed on traditional infrastructure. Kubernetes integration is optional and provides additional automation benefits.
SourceVitess: How does Vitess handle cross-shard transactions?
Vitess supports distributed transactions across shards, but they require queries to be routed through the sharding key. Transactions without a proper sharding key can result in slower performance.
SourceVitess: Does Vitess enforce foreign key constraints?
Vitess does not enforce foreign key constraints across shards by default. Referential integrity must be managed at the application layer, though per-database support can be enabled with limitations.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Supabase vs Asana
- Supabase vs ClickUp
- Supabase vs Figma
- Supabase vs Linear
- Supabase vs Postgres
- Supabase vs Redis
- Supabase vs Excalidraw
- Supabase vs MongoDB
- Supabase vs Notion
- Supabase vs PostHog
- Supabase vs GitHub
- Supabase vs Apache Hadoop
- Supabase vs Height
- Supabase vs Honeycomb
- Supabase vs Istio
- Supabase vs Lucidchart
- Supabase vs GitHub Desktop
- Supabase vs Cockroach Labs
- Supabase vs TiDB
- Supabase vs Readyset
- Supabase vs Amazon Aurora
- Supabase vs NATS
- Supabase vs PostgreSQL
- Supabase vs RabbitMQ
- Supabase vs ClickHouse
- Supabase vs Azure SQL
- Supabase vs MariaDB
- Supabase vs Oracle Database
- Supabase vs IBM Db2
- Supabase vs Instaclustr
- Supabase vs Knack
- Supabase vs LanceDB
- Supabase vs Marqo
- Supabase vs Nile
- Supabase vs Amazon Redshift
- Vitess vs Asana
- Vitess vs ClickUp
- Vitess vs Figma
- Vitess vs Linear
- Vitess vs Postgres
- Vitess vs Redis
- Vitess vs Excalidraw
- Vitess vs MongoDB
- Vitess vs Notion
- Vitess vs PostHog
- Vitess vs GitHub
- Vitess vs Apache Hadoop
- Vitess vs Height
- Vitess vs Honeycomb
- Vitess vs Istio
- Vitess vs Lucidchart
- Vitess vs GitHub Desktop
- Vitess vs Cockroach Labs
- Vitess vs TiDB
- Vitess vs Readyset
- Vitess vs Amazon Aurora
- Vitess vs NATS
- Vitess vs PostgreSQL
- Vitess vs RabbitMQ
- Vitess vs ClickHouse
- Vitess vs Azure SQL
- Vitess vs MariaDB
- Vitess vs Oracle Database
- Vitess vs IBM Db2
- Vitess vs Instaclustr
- Vitess vs Knack
- Vitess vs LanceDB
- Vitess vs Marqo
- Vitess vs Nile
- Vitess vs Amazon Redshift

