Technology · head to head
LaunchDarkly vs Split

Split
Testing
Feature flags tied to a metrics pipeline that attributes production impact to each release, now Harness FME
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only LaunchDarkly has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: LaunchDarkly pricing scales rapidly with monthly active users, becoming expensive at scale; Split split is now a module of the Harness platform and split.io redirects to harness.io, so buying it means entering a Harness commercial relationship rather than a standalone flag vendor contract.
- They diverge on capability: LaunchDarkly covers Feature flags, Split covers Feature flags with targeting.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which LaunchDarkly and Split actually diverge.
| Attribute | LaunchDarkly | Split |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | Unknown | quote |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Web, Cloud, APIs | Web, API, iOS, Android, Java, Node.js, Python, Go, .NET |
| Category | Technology | Testing |
| Founded | 2014 | Unknown |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in LaunchDarkly
- Feature flags
- Progressive rollouts
- User targeting
- A/B testing
- Kill switches
- Audit log
- Multi-environment
- SDKs for all platforms
Only in Split
- Feature flags with targeting
- Metrics impact engine
- Guardrail metrics
- Statistical significance testing
- Event ingestion
- SDKs and streaming updates
- Audit and approvals
- Harness platform integration
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
LaunchDarkly
- Progressive deliverynot Split
- Feature experimentationnot Split
- Risk mitigationnot Split
- Performance optimizationnot Split
- Infrastructure migrationnot Split
Split
- A product organisation that wants every release measured against conversion and latency by default, not only deliberate experimentsnot LaunchDarkly
- Running A/B tests with real statistical significance rather than comparing two dashboard linesnot LaunchDarkly
- Catching a regression at five per cent rollout because a guardrail metric fires before the change reaches everyonenot LaunchDarkly
- A team already committed to Harness for CI and CD that wants flags in the same platform and contractnot LaunchDarkly
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
LaunchDarkly
- Pricing scales rapidly with monthly active users, becoming expensive at scale
- Limited seats for engineers on standard plans, forcing upgrade to enterprise
- Advanced features like experimentation and audit logs require higher-tier plans
- Occasional reliability issues and backend delays reported by users
Split
- Split is now a module of the Harness platform and split.io redirects to harness.io, so buying it means entering a Harness commercial relationship rather than a standalone flag vendor contract.
- Harness no longer publishes per-module prices, so an organisation that wants only feature management cannot get a list price and must negotiate a module out of a platform bundle.
- The measurement engine needs traffic volume to reach significance, so a product with modest usage gets flags with an experimentation layer it will rarely be able to conclude anything from.
- Metric attribution depends on correctly instrumented events flowing into Split, which is an integration project in its own right; without it you have paid for an experimentation platform and are using it as a flag switch.
- As part of a larger DevOps suite the roadmap now competes with CI, CD, security and cloud cost modules for attention, so feature management is no longer the company’s single focus the way it was as an independent product.
Pricing, plan by plan
LaunchDarkly
Free- DeveloperFree
- Unlimited seats
- Unlimited feature flags
- A/B tests and experiments
- Foundation$undefined/mo
- $12 per connection
- $10 per 1K MAU
- Targeted segmentation
- Enterprise$undefined/mo
- Custom pricing
- Advanced automation
- Compliance features
Split
On request- Harness FreeFree
- Harness Open Source and community support
- Intended for individuals and small teams
- Feature management capability limited at this tier
- Harness Essentials$undefined/year
- Bundled DevOps modules including CI, CD, IaC and security testing
- Standard support
- Pricing requires contacting sales
- Harness Enterprise$undefined/year
- Mix and match from 15 or more modules including Feature Management and Experimentation
- Premier support with a dedicated account manager
- Higher pipeline concurrency and organisation limits
Which should you pick?
Choose LaunchDarkly if
- You need feature flags.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Cloud, APIs.
- You also want progressive rollouts.
Choose Split if
- You need feature flags with targeting.
- You work on Web, API, iOS, Android, Java, Node.js, Python, Go, .NET.
- You also want metrics impact engine.
Questions people ask
- Is LaunchDarkly or Split better?
- Neither clearly leads. LaunchDarkly starts at Free and Split at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, LaunchDarkly or Split?
- LaunchDarkly has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for LaunchDarkly and On request for Split.
- Does LaunchDarkly or Split run on more platforms?
- LaunchDarkly runs on Web, Cloud, APIs. Split runs on Web, API, iOS, Android, Java, Node.js, Python, Go, .NET.
- Can I use LaunchDarkly for free?
- Yes. LaunchDarkly has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Split starts at On request.
- What is LaunchDarkly best used for?
- LaunchDarkly is most often used for progressive delivery, feature experimentation, risk mitigation, performance optimization. Of those, progressive delivery and feature experimentation are not what Split is typically brought in for.
- What can LaunchDarkly do that Split cannot?
- LaunchDarkly covers Feature flags, Progressive rollouts, User targeting, A/B testing. Split covers Feature flags with targeting, Metrics impact engine, Guardrail metrics, Statistical significance testing.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
LaunchDarkly: What does the free Developer plan include?
The free Developer plan includes unlimited seats, unlimited feature flags, A/B tests and experiments, 30 SDKs, 10 million logs and traces, 5,000 session replays and errors, and 14 days of data retention.
SourceSplit: Is Split still called Split?
It is now sold as Harness Feature Management and Experimentation after the Harness acquisition, and split.io redirects to harness.io.
LaunchDarkly: How does LaunchDarkly pricing scale?
Foundation plan pricing is $12 per connection plus $10 per 1,000 Monthly Active Users (MAU). Enterprise and Guardian plans have custom pricing based on usage, advanced features, and compliance requirements.
SourceSplit: Can I buy just feature flags?
Not from a price list. Harness publishes bundle tiers and directs single-module buyers to sales.
LaunchDarkly: Does LaunchDarkly integrate with Jira and Slack?
Yes, LaunchDarkly integrates with Jira Cloud, allowing you to link feature flags to Jira issues and create issues from observability data. It also integrates with Slack for flag notifications and allows authorized members to trigger flag changes from Slack.
SourceSplit: What does it do that a plain flag service does not?
It attributes changes in your product metrics to specific flags with statistical significance testing and alerts on guardrail metrics.
LaunchDarkly: What is dark launching and how does LaunchDarkly enable it?
Dark launching keeps code changes hidden in production until ready to enable. LaunchDarkly enables this through feature flags that let teams safely test code in production before rolling out to users.
SourceSplit: Do we need a lot of traffic?
Yes. Statistical tests need volume to conclude, so low-traffic products get limited value from the measurement layer.
Related pages
More on LaunchDarkly
Other head to heads
- LaunchDarkly vs PostHog
- LaunchDarkly vs Terraform
- LaunchDarkly vs GitLab
- LaunchDarkly vs Jira
- LaunchDarkly vs Jenkins
- LaunchDarkly vs Kubernetes
- LaunchDarkly vs PagerDuty
- LaunchDarkly vs Docker
- LaunchDarkly vs Auth0
- LaunchDarkly vs Sentry
- LaunchDarkly vs LogRocket
- LaunchDarkly vs Asana
- LaunchDarkly vs WebStorm
- LaunchDarkly vs Zabbix Cloud
- LaunchDarkly vs Intercom
- LaunchDarkly vs Mixpanel
- LaunchDarkly vs Monday.com
- LaunchDarkly vs Eppo
- LaunchDarkly vs GrowthBook
- LaunchDarkly vs Kameleoon
- LaunchDarkly vs Selenium
- LaunchDarkly vs TestRail
- LaunchDarkly vs Katalon
- LaunchDarkly vs Sauce Labs
- LaunchDarkly vs Applitools
- LaunchDarkly vs QA Wolf
- LaunchDarkly vs BrowserStack
- LaunchDarkly vs CircleCI
- LaunchDarkly vs Robot Framework
- LaunchDarkly vs Testsigma
- LaunchDarkly vs Vitest
- LaunchDarkly vs Cucumber
- LaunchDarkly vs Detox
- Split vs PostHog
- Split vs Terraform
- Split vs GitLab
- Split vs Jira
- Split vs Jenkins
- Split vs Kubernetes
- Split vs PagerDuty
- Split vs Docker
- Split vs Auth0
- Split vs Sentry
- Split vs LogRocket
- Split vs Asana
- Split vs WebStorm
- Split vs Zabbix Cloud
- Split vs Intercom
- Split vs Mixpanel
- Split vs Monday.com
- Split vs Eppo
- Split vs GrowthBook
- Split vs Kameleoon
- Split vs Selenium
- Split vs TestRail
- Split vs Katalon
- Split vs Sauce Labs
- Split vs Applitools
- Split vs QA Wolf
- Split vs BrowserStack
- Split vs CircleCI
- Split vs Robot Framework
- Split vs Testsigma
- Split vs Vitest
- Split vs Cucumber
- Split vs Detox

