Testing · head to head
Split vs Statsig

Split
Testing
Feature flags tied to a metrics pipeline that attributes production impact to each release, now Harness FME
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Statsig
Project Management
Unified platform for feature flags, A/B testing, and product analytics
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Statsig has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Split split is now a module of the Harness platform and split.io redirects to harness.io, so buying it means entering a Harness commercial relationship rather than a standalone flag vendor contract.; Statsig pro plan is limited to a single project, requiring Enterprise for multi-project support.
- They diverge on capability: Split covers Feature flags with targeting, Statsig covers Feature Flags.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Split and Statsig actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Split
- Feature flags with targeting
- Metrics impact engine
- Guardrail metrics
- Statistical significance testing
- Event ingestion
- SDKs and streaming updates
- Audit and approvals
- Harness platform integration
Only in Statsig
- Feature Flags
- Experimentation
- Product Analytics
- Session Replay
- Web Analytics
- Warehouse-Native Deployment
- Role-Based Access & SSO
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Split
- A product organisation that wants every release measured against conversion and latency by default, not only deliberate experimentsnot Statsig
- Running A/B tests with real statistical significance rather than comparing two dashboard linesnot Statsig
- Catching a regression at five per cent rollout because a guardrail metric fires before the change reaches everyonenot Statsig
- A team already committed to Harness for CI and CD that wants flags in the same platform and contractnot Statsig
Statsig
- Rolling out features gradually with kill switchesnot Split
- Running A/B tests with statistical rigornot Split
- Tracing metric regressions to specific releasesnot Split
- Consolidating analytics and experimentation toolingnot Split
- Warehouse-native experimentation for data teamsnot Split
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Split
- Split is now a module of the Harness platform and split.io redirects to harness.io, so buying it means entering a Harness commercial relationship rather than a standalone flag vendor contract.
- Harness no longer publishes per-module prices, so an organisation that wants only feature management cannot get a list price and must negotiate a module out of a platform bundle.
- The measurement engine needs traffic volume to reach significance, so a product with modest usage gets flags with an experimentation layer it will rarely be able to conclude anything from.
- Metric attribution depends on correctly instrumented events flowing into Split, which is an integration project in its own right; without it you have paid for an experimentation platform and are using it as a flag switch.
- As part of a larger DevOps suite the roadmap now competes with CI, CD, security and cloud cost modules for attention, so feature management is no longer the company’s single focus the way it was as an independent product.
Statsig
- Pro plan is limited to a single project, requiring Enterprise for multi-project support.
- Overage pricing on the Pro plan can become costly for high-event-volume products.
- Warehouse-native deployment and advanced access controls are gated behind custom Enterprise contracts.
- Free tier session replay and analytics retention are capped, pushing active teams toward paid tiers quickly.
Pricing, plan by plan
Split
On request- Harness FreeFree
- Harness Open Source and community support
- Intended for individuals and small teams
- Feature management capability limited at this tier
- Harness Essentials$undefined/year
- Bundled DevOps modules including CI, CD, IaC and security testing
- Standard support
- Pricing requires contacting sales
- Harness Enterprise$undefined/year
- Mix and match from 15 or more modules including Feature Management and Experimentation
- Premier support with a dedicated account manager
- Higher pipeline concurrency and organisation limits
Statsig
Free- DeveloperFree
- 2M events/month
- Unlimited flag & config checks
- 50,000 session replays/month
- Pro$150/month
- 5M events included, then $0.05 per 1K events
- Advanced experimentation & analytics
- Unlimited analytics retention
- Enterprise$undefined/month
- Volume-discounted event/experiment contracts
- Warehouse-native deployment
- SSO & role-based access controls
Which should you pick?
Choose Split if
- You need feature flags with targeting.
- You work on Web, API, iOS, Android, Java, Node.js, Python, Go, .NET.
- You also want metrics impact engine.
Choose Statsig if
- You need feature flags.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on web, api.
- You also want experimentation.
Questions people ask
- Is Split or Statsig better?
- Neither clearly leads. Split starts at On request and Statsig at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Split or Statsig?
- Statsig has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Split and Free for Statsig.
- Does Split or Statsig run on more platforms?
- Split runs on Web, API, iOS, Android, Java, Node.js, Python, Go, .NET. Statsig runs on web, api.
- Can I use Statsig for free?
- Yes. Statsig has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Split starts at On request.
- What is Split best used for?
- Split is most often used for a product organisation that wants every release measured against conversion and latency by default, not only deliberate experiments, running a/b tests with real statistical significance rather than comparing two dashboard lines, catching a regression at five per cent rollout because a guardrail metric fires before the change reaches everyone, a team already committed to harness for ci and cd that wants flags in the same platform and contract. Of those, a product organisation that wants every release measured against conversion and latency by default, not only deliberate experiments and running a/b tests with real statistical significance rather than comparing two dashboard lines are not what Statsig is typically brought in for.
- What can Split do that Statsig cannot?
- Split covers Feature flags with targeting, Metrics impact engine, Guardrail metrics, Statistical significance testing. Statsig covers Feature Flags, Experimentation, Product Analytics, Session Replay.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Split: Is Split still called Split?
It is now sold as Harness Feature Management and Experimentation after the Harness acquisition, and split.io redirects to harness.io.
Statsig: What does Statsig cost?
Statsig offers a free Developer tier, a Pro tier at $150/month with 5M included events and $0.05 per 1,000 events after that, and custom Enterprise pricing based on event or experiment volume.
SourceSplit: Can I buy just feature flags?
Not from a price list. Harness publishes bundle tiers and directs single-module buyers to sales.
Statsig: Is there a free plan, and what are its limits?
The free Developer plan includes 2M events per month, unlimited flag and config checks, 50,000 session replays per month, and 1-year analytics data retention with unlimited seats.
SourceSplit: What does it do that a plain flag service does not?
It attributes changes in your product metrics to specific flags with statistical significance testing and alerts on guardrail metrics.
Statsig: How is usage metered on Statsig?
Statsig meters billable events including exposures with Metric Lifts enabled, log events from SDKs or imports, ingested warehouse metrics, and custom metrics; disabled flag checks are not metered.
SourceSplit: Do we need a lot of traffic?
Yes. Statistical tests need volume to conclude, so low-traffic products get limited value from the measurement layer.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Split vs Eppo
- Split vs GrowthBook
- Split vs Kameleoon
- Split vs Selenium
- Split vs TestRail
- Split vs Katalon
- Split vs Sauce Labs
- Split vs Applitools
- Split vs QA Wolf
- Split vs BrowserStack
- Split vs CircleCI
- Split vs Robot Framework
- Split vs Testsigma
- Split vs Vitest
- Split vs Cucumber
- Split vs Detox
- Split vs Roadmunk
- Split vs Toggl Plan
- Split vs Craft Docs
- Split vs Taskade
- Split vs Basecamp
- Split vs Clockwise
- Split vs Reclaim.ai
- Split vs Trello
- Split vs GanttPRO
- Split vs MeisterTask
- Split vs Sunsama
- Split vs Freedcamp
- Split vs Teamhood
- Split vs Tempo Timesheets
- Split vs Visor
- Split vs Zoho Projects
- Split vs Huly
- Split vs Kanbanize
- Statsig vs Eppo
- Statsig vs GrowthBook
- Statsig vs Kameleoon
- Statsig vs Selenium
- Statsig vs TestRail
- Statsig vs Katalon
- Statsig vs Sauce Labs
- Statsig vs Applitools
- Statsig vs QA Wolf
- Statsig vs BrowserStack
- Statsig vs CircleCI
- Statsig vs Robot Framework
- Statsig vs Testsigma
- Statsig vs Vitest
- Statsig vs Cucumber
- Statsig vs Detox
- Statsig vs Roadmunk
- Statsig vs Toggl Plan
- Statsig vs Craft Docs
- Statsig vs Taskade
- Statsig vs Basecamp
- Statsig vs Clockwise
- Statsig vs Reclaim.ai
- Statsig vs Trello
- Statsig vs GanttPRO
- Statsig vs MeisterTask
- Statsig vs Sunsama
- Statsig vs Freedcamp
- Statsig vs Teamhood
- Statsig vs Tempo Timesheets
- Statsig vs Visor
- Statsig vs Zoho Projects
- Statsig vs Huly
- Statsig vs Kanbanize
