Softwr

Education · head to head

Skoolur vs Skyward

Skoolur logo

Skoolur

Education

Live online tutoring for Indian school students in Classes 1 to 10

From
2000/month
Rated
-
Skyward logo

Skyward

Education

Student information and school ERP for K-12 districts and municipalities

From
On request
Rated
-

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Skoolur covers Classes 1 to 10 only, so students entering Classes 11 and 12 must move elsewhere at exactly the point pressure peaks; Skyward no pricing is published anywhere, so the only way to learn what a district of your size pays is to enter a sales cycle, and comparative quotes across vendors are hard to obtain before a board meeting deadline.
  • They diverge on capability: Skoolur covers Consistent teacher, Skyward covers Qmlativ SIS.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Skoolur and Skyward actually diverge.

Attributes where Skoolur and Skyward differ
AttributeSkoolurSkyward
Starting price2000/monthOn request
Pricing modelMonthly fee by class level and format, with no registration or material chargesquote
PlatformsWeb, CloudWeb, iOS, Android

Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Education).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Skoolur

  • Consistent teacher
  • Free assessment
  • Multi-board coverage
  • Group and one-to-one
  • Free resources
  • Regional languages

Only in Skyward

  • Qmlativ SIS
  • School Business Suite
  • Position control
  • Family and student access
  • State reporting packs
  • Municipality edition
  • Data mining and reporting
  • Employee access

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Skoolur

  • Parents wanting a consistent tutor rather than a rotating poolnot Skyward
  • Students following an Indian board curriculum from outside Indianot Skyward
  • Families wanting a diagnostic assessment before committing to tuitionnot Skyward
  • Supplementing school teaching in specific weak subjectsnot Skyward

Skyward

  • A district of 8,000 students that wants payroll, position budgeting and the SIS on one vendor contract instead of paying an integrator to reconcile employee records nightlynot Skoolur
  • A Wisconsin or Texas district where state submission deadlines are the dominant compliance burden and prebuilt state packs remove weeks of extract worknot Skoolur
  • A district still on the older PaC client-server product deciding whether to migrate to Qmlativ or replace the SIS outrightnot Skoolur
  • A county government buying the finance and HR half on its own, separate from any school usenot Skoolur

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Skoolur

  • Covers Classes 1 to 10 only, so students entering Classes 11 and 12 must move elsewhere at exactly the point pressure peaks
  • Group classes mean less individual attention than one-to-one, which costs substantially more
  • Live scheduled classes require fixed weekly availability, unlike self-paced platforms
  • Priced per subject per month, so a student needing several subjects sees the total rise quickly

Skyward

  • No pricing is published anywhere, so the only way to learn what a district of your size pays is to enter a sales cycle, and comparative quotes across vendors are hard to obtain before a board meeting deadline.
  • State reporting depth is uneven: the packs are excellent in the states where Skyward has a large installed base and thin elsewhere, so a district in a low-penetration state inherits reporting work the vendor absorbs for others.
  • The third-party integration ecosystem is much smaller than PowerSchool's, so an edtech tool your teachers want may support the market leader first and Skyward months later or not at all.
  • Two product generations are still live and the migration from PaC to Qmlativ is a project in its own right, meaning a district can be paying for a modernisation programme rather than new capability.
  • Buying SIS and ERP from one vendor concentrates risk: a pricing increase, an ownership change or a product direction you dislike affects enrolment, payroll and the general ledger simultaneously, and unpicking that is a multi-year replacement rather than swapping one system.

Pricing, plan by plan

Skoolur

2000/month
  • Spoken English$2000/month
    • All class levels
    • Live group classes
    • Same teacher weekly
  • Group tuition$3000/month
    • Rate varies by class level
    • Small group classes
    • Free assessment
  • One-to-one$5000/month
    • Rate varies by class level
    • Individual attention
    • Same teacher weekly

Skyward

On request
  • Student Management Suite$undefined/year
    • Enrolment, scheduling, attendance and grading
    • State reporting
    • Family and student portals
  • School Business Suite$undefined/year
    • Finance, payroll and HR
    • Position control
    • Usually quoted alongside the SIS as a bundle
  • Municipality Edition$undefined/year
    • Finance and HR for local government
    • Quoted per organisation

Which should you pick?

Choose Skoolur if

  • You need consistent teacher.
  • You work on Web, Cloud.
  • You also want free assessment.

Choose Skyward if

  • You need qmlativ sis.
  • You work on Web, iOS, Android.
  • You also want school business suite.

Questions people ask

Is Skoolur or Skyward better?
Neither clearly leads. Skoolur starts at 2000/month and Skyward at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Skoolur or Skyward?
Skoolur starts at 2000/month and Skyward at On request.
Does Skoolur or Skyward run on more platforms?
Skoolur runs on Web, Cloud. Skyward runs on Web, iOS, Android.
What is Skoolur best used for?
Skoolur is most often used for parents wanting a consistent tutor rather than a rotating pool, students following an indian board curriculum from outside india, families wanting a diagnostic assessment before committing to tuition, supplementing school teaching in specific weak subjects. Of those, parents wanting a consistent tutor rather than a rotating pool and students following an indian board curriculum from outside india are not what Skyward is typically brought in for.
What can Skoolur do that Skyward cannot?
Skoolur covers Consistent teacher, Free assessment, Multi-board coverage, Group and one-to-one. Skyward covers Qmlativ SIS, School Business Suite, Position control, Family and student access.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Skoolur: What does Skoolur cost?

Spoken English is ₹2,000 per month across all classes. Group tuition runs ₹3,000 to ₹5,000 and one-to-one ₹5,000 to ₹8,000, both varying by class level. The site states there are no registration or material charges.

Skyward: Was Skyward bought by PowerSchool?

No. Skyward remains an independent company based in Stevens Point, Wisconsin, and competes directly with PowerSchool in the K-12 SIS market. It is one of the few SIS vendors of scale not owned by a private equity roll-up.

Skoolur: Which boards does it cover?

CBSE, ICSE, State boards, and international curricula including IB and IGCSE.

Skyward: Is pricing per student?

Yes, the student system is generally quoted per student per year with the finance suite priced separately, but no rate card is published and discounts vary heavily by district size and term length.

Skoolur: Is the teacher the same each week?

Yes, that is one of its stated differences from platforms that assign whoever is available for a given session.

Skyward: Can we buy just the finance and HR suite?

Yes. School Business Suite is sold on its own, and there is a municipality edition for city and county government with no school component.

Skoolur: What happens before enrolment?

A free 20-minute assessment establishes where the student actually is, and the recommendation follows from that rather than from a standard package.

Skyward: What is the difference between Qmlativ and PaC?

PaC is the older client-server generation and Qmlativ is the current browser-based product. New districts buy Qmlativ; existing PaC districts are being migrated.

Share

Related pages

Other head to heads