Softwr

APIs · head to head

Skaleet vs Zeplo

Skaleet logo

Skaleet

APIs

Cloud-native core banking and payment hub with deployments measured in months

From
On request
Rated
-
Zeplo logo

Zeplo

APIs

Message queue as a URL prefix, adding retries and delays to any HTTP request

From
Free
Rated
-

The short version

  • Only Zeplo has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
  • Each has a real cost: Skaleet the installed base is in the tens rather than the hundreds, so the pool of consultants and systems integrators who know the platform is small and expensive.; Zeplo zeplo sits directly in the execution path of your background work, so an outage at a very small vendor means your jobs do not run at all, and there is no published SLA below Enterprise.
  • They diverge on capability: Skaleet covers Cloud-native core, Zeplo covers URL prefix interface.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Skaleet and Zeplo actually diverge.

Attributes where Skaleet and Zeplo differ
AttributeSkaleetZeplo
Starting priceOn requestFree
Pricing modelquotePer month by request count
Free tierNoYes
PlatformsWeb, REST API, LinuxWeb, Cloud

Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (APIs).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Skaleet

  • Cloud-native core
  • Payment hub
  • Card management
  • Lending
  • API-first
  • Configurable products

Only in Zeplo

  • URL prefix interface
  • Retries with backoff
  • Delayed delivery
  • Cron scheduling
  • Concurrency limits
  • Deduplication keys
  • Request logs
  • Team workspaces

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Skaleet

  • A banking group launching a digital savings or deposit brand in a new country within a yearnot Zeplo
  • A bank modernising payments to ISO 20022 without replacing its whole corenot Zeplo
  • A payroll or HR software company adding embedded banking to its productnot Zeplo
  • A payment service provider needing a ledger and accounts under its existing licencenot Zeplo

Zeplo

  • A Vercel or Cloudflare Workers application that needs retried background jobs without deploying a separate always-on workernot Skaleet
  • A team that wants a webhook receiver protected by a concurrency limit so a burst does not overwhelm a downstream APInot Skaleet
  • A small product needing cron jobs against HTTP endpoints without adding a scheduler to its infrastructurenot Skaleet
  • A developer adding idempotent retries to an unreliable third-party API call with a one-line URL changenot Skaleet

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Skaleet

  • The installed base is in the tens rather than the hundreds, so the pool of consultants and systems integrators who know the platform is small and expensive.
  • Speed references are mostly greenfield launches inside large groups, which is an easier problem than migrating an existing book off a legacy core.
  • It is European-centric, with payment rails and regulatory work concentrated on SEPA and EU requirements rather than global coverage.
  • As a smaller vendor carrying a bank core, it attracts hard concentration and viability questions in procurement that larger competitors do not face.
  • Pricing is unpublished and scaled by accounts and transactions, so a bank whose volumes grow faster than forecast faces cost escalation it did not model.

Zeplo

  • Zeplo sits directly in the execution path of your background work, so an outage at a very small vendor means your jobs do not run at all, and there is no published SLA below Enterprise.
  • The free Developer tier includes only 500 requests a month and one team member, so it is a demonstration allowance rather than a usable free plan for anything real.
  • Overage on the Developer tier is 20 US dollars per 100,000 requests, two hundred times the marginal rate on the Company tier, so exceeding the free allowance without upgrading is expensive.
  • Team members cost 15 US dollars each beyond the plan allowance, which is an odd charge on an infrastructure product billed by request volume.
  • Log retention is 30 days on both published tiers, so anything requiring longer audit trails on job execution has to be logged separately.

Pricing, plan by plan

Skaleet

On request
  • Skaleet Core Banking Platform$undefined/year
    • Subscription licence scaled by accounts and transaction volume
    • Payment hub licensable separately from the full core
    • Implementation and configuration charged as a project

Zeplo

Free
  • DeveloperFree
    • 500 requests a month included
    • $20 per additional 100,000 requests
    • 1 team member
  • Company$39/month
    • 1,000,000 requests a month included
    • $10 per additional million requests
    • Up to 3 team members
  • Enterprise$undefined/month
    • Volume discounts
    • Custom team size
    • Support with SLA

Which should you pick?

Choose Skaleet if

  • You need cloud-native core.
  • You work on Web, REST API, Linux.
  • You also want payment hub.

Choose Zeplo if

  • You need url prefix interface.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Web, Cloud.
  • You also want retries with backoff.

Questions people ask

Is Skaleet or Zeplo better?
Neither clearly leads. Skaleet starts at On request and Zeplo at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Skaleet or Zeplo?
Zeplo has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Skaleet and Free for Zeplo.
Does Skaleet or Zeplo run on more platforms?
Skaleet runs on Web, REST API, Linux. Zeplo runs on Web, Cloud.
Can I use Zeplo for free?
Yes. Zeplo has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Skaleet starts at On request.
What is Skaleet best used for?
Skaleet is most often used for a banking group launching a digital savings or deposit brand in a new country within a year, a bank modernising payments to iso 20022 without replacing its whole core, a payroll or hr software company adding embedded banking to its product, a payment service provider needing a ledger and accounts under its existing licence. Of those, a banking group launching a digital savings or deposit brand in a new country within a year and a bank modernising payments to iso 20022 without replacing its whole core are not what Zeplo is typically brought in for.
What can Skaleet do that Zeplo cannot?
Skaleet covers Cloud-native core, Payment hub, Card management, Lending. Zeplo covers URL prefix interface, Retries with backoff, Delayed delivery, Cron scheduling.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Skaleet: What was Skaleet called before?

TagPay. The company rebranded to Skaleet while keeping the same platform lineage.

Zeplo: How does Zeplo work?

You prefix your endpoint URL with zeplo.to and add query parameters for retries, delay, cron or concurrency. No SDK or broker is needed.

Skaleet: Can I buy just the payment hub?

Yes. The payment engine is licensable standalone and can sit over an existing core, which is a common first step.

Zeplo: What does it cost?

Free for 500 requests a month; 39 US dollars a month for a million requests, then 10 dollars per additional million.

Skaleet: How fast are real deployments?

Named European deployments have gone live in six to twelve months, including a Crédit Agricole savings platform live in Germany in eight months.

Zeplo: Is it suitable for critical jobs?

It is a small vendor in your execution path with no published SLA below Enterprise, so weigh that against the convenience.

Zeplo: Does it work with serverless platforms?

Yes, that is its main use, covering Vercel, Cloudflare Workers, Netlify and similar environments that lack long-running workers.

Share

Related pages

Other head to heads