Softwr

APIs · head to head

Skaleet vs Yodlee

Skaleet logo

Skaleet

APIs

Cloud-native core banking and payment hub with deployments measured in months

From
On request
Rated
-
Yodlee logo

Yodlee

APIs

Long-running financial data aggregation with deep transaction history

From
On request
Rated
-

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Skaleet the installed base is in the tens rather than the hundreds, so the pool of consultants and systems integrators who know the platform is small and expensive.; Yodlee ownership has changed twice in two years, from Envestnet to Bain Capital control and then to STG in 2025, so the roadmap is now set by a financial sponsor and long term product direction is harder to rely on than it was.
  • They diverge on capability: Skaleet covers Cloud-native core, Yodlee covers Account aggregation.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Skaleet and Yodlee actually diverge.

Attributes where Skaleet and Yodlee differ
AttributeSkaleetYodlee
PlatformsWeb, REST API, LinuxAPI, Web

Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (APIs).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Skaleet

  • Cloud-native core
  • Payment hub
  • Card management
  • Lending
  • API-first
  • Configurable products

Only in Yodlee

  • Account aggregation
  • Long transaction history
  • Investment and holdings data
  • Account verification
  • Transaction enrichment
  • Cash flow analytics
  • Document retrieval
  • International coverage

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Skaleet

  • A banking group launching a digital savings or deposit brand in a new country within a yearnot Yodlee
  • A bank modernising payments to ISO 20022 without replacing its whole corenot Yodlee
  • A payroll or HR software company adding embedded banking to its productnot Yodlee
  • A payment service provider needing a ledger and accounts under its existing licencenot Yodlee

Yodlee

  • A wealth platform that needs held-away brokerage holdings as well as bank balances to show a client their complete positionnot Skaleet
  • A lender doing cash flow underwriting that needs several years of transaction history rather than the ninety days newer aggregators returnnot Skaleet
  • A financial institution needing statement and tax document retrieval alongside transaction datanot Skaleet
  • A firm operating in several countries that wants one aggregator rather than a US provider plus a European onenot Skaleet

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Skaleet

  • The installed base is in the tens rather than the hundreds, so the pool of consultants and systems integrators who know the platform is small and expensive.
  • Speed references are mostly greenfield launches inside large groups, which is an easier problem than migrating an existing book off a legacy core.
  • It is European-centric, with payment rails and regulatory work concentrated on SEPA and EU requirements rather than global coverage.
  • As a smaller vendor carrying a bank core, it attracts hard concentration and viability questions in procurement that larger competitors do not face.
  • Pricing is unpublished and scaled by accounts and transactions, so a bank whose volumes grow faster than forecast faces cost escalation it did not model.

Yodlee

  • Ownership has changed twice in two years, from Envestnet to Bain Capital control and then to STG in 2025, so the roadmap is now set by a financial sponsor and long term product direction is harder to rely on than it was.
  • Parts of the connection estate still depend on credential based access, which banks and regulators are phasing out in favour of FDX APIs, so coverage will shift as institutions withdraw the older method and the migration is not under your control.
  • The platform predates modern API design and developers consistently find the integration heavier and the data model more idiosyncratic than newer aggregators, which lengthens build time.
  • Pricing is enterprise shaped with annual commitments and nothing published, so small and mid sized buyers have no anchor and cannot start without a sales cycle.
  • Investment data, document retrieval and analytics are licensed on top of core aggregation, so the capabilities that justify choosing Yodlee over a cheaper rival are the ones that raise the price above it.

Pricing, plan by plan

Skaleet

On request
  • Skaleet Core Banking Platform$undefined/year
    • Subscription licence scaled by accounts and transaction volume
    • Payment hub licensable separately from the full core
    • Implementation and configuration charged as a project

Yodlee

On request
  • Yodlee Data Platform$undefined/year
    • Priced by connected users, refresh frequency and data types
    • Investment and document retrieval licensed separately from core aggregation
    • Enterprise agreements with annual commitments

Which should you pick?

Choose Skaleet if

  • You need cloud-native core.
  • You work on Web, REST API, Linux.
  • You also want payment hub.

Choose Yodlee if

  • You need account aggregation.
  • You work on API, Web.
  • You also want long transaction history.

Questions people ask

Is Skaleet or Yodlee better?
Neither clearly leads. Skaleet starts at On request and Yodlee at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Skaleet or Yodlee?
Skaleet starts at On request and Yodlee at On request.
Does Skaleet or Yodlee run on more platforms?
Skaleet runs on Web, REST API, Linux. Yodlee runs on API, Web.
What is Skaleet best used for?
Skaleet is most often used for a banking group launching a digital savings or deposit brand in a new country within a year, a bank modernising payments to iso 20022 without replacing its whole core, a payroll or hr software company adding embedded banking to its product, a payment service provider needing a ledger and accounts under its existing licence. Of those, a banking group launching a digital savings or deposit brand in a new country within a year and a bank modernising payments to iso 20022 without replacing its whole core are not what Yodlee is typically brought in for.
What can Skaleet do that Yodlee cannot?
Skaleet covers Cloud-native core, Payment hub, Card management, Lending. Yodlee covers Account aggregation, Long transaction history, Investment and holdings data, Account verification.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Skaleet: What was Skaleet called before?

TagPay. The company rebranded to Skaleet while keeping the same platform lineage.

Yodlee: Who owns Yodlee now?

Private equity firm STG, which acquired it from Envestnet in a deal closing in 2025. Envestnet, itself taken private by Bain Capital and Reverence Capital in 2024, retained access through a partnership.

Skaleet: Can I buy just the payment hub?

Yes. The payment engine is licensable standalone and can sit over an existing core, which is a common first step.

Yodlee: Why choose Yodlee over Plaid?

Longer transaction history, deeper investment and held-away account coverage, and document retrieval. Those are wealth management and underwriting requirements rather than consumer fintech ones.

Skaleet: How fast are real deployments?

Named European deployments have gone live in six to twelve months, including a Crédit Agricole savings platform live in Germany in eight months.

Yodlee: Does it still use screen scraping?

Parts of the estate rely on credential based connections, which the industry is phasing out in favour of regulated APIs. Ask for direct API coverage by institution before signing.

Yodlee: Is pricing published?

No. It is quoted by connected users, refresh frequency and data types, with investment data and document retrieval priced separately.

Share

Related pages

Other head to heads