Manufacturing · head to head
Kepware Server vs Sensemore

Kepware Server
Manufacturing
Industrial connectivity server translating 150-plus PLC protocols into OPC UA, formerly KEPServerEX
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Sensemore
Manufacturing
Low-cost wireless vibration and temperature monitoring with cloud analytics from a Turkish sensor manufacturer
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Kepware Server the base server is the small part of the bill; driver suites are priced by protocol family, and a mixed-vendor plant buys several, which is how a connectivity layer alone reaches tens of thousands of dollars.; Sensemore the company is small and young, so the failure-mode library behind its models is built on a much narrower installed base than SKF or Augury can draw on, and diagnostic specificity reflects that.
- They diverge on capability: Kepware Server covers 150-plus device drivers, Sensemore covers Wireless vibration sensors.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Kepware Server and Sensemore actually diverge.
| Attribute | Kepware Server | Sensemore |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Windows, Linux | Web, iOS, Android |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Manufacturing).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Kepware Server
- 150-plus device drivers
- OPC UA server
- IoT Gateway
- DataLogger
- Redundancy Master
- Security Policies
- Configuration API
- Kepware Edge
Only in Sensemore
- Wireless vibration sensors
- Handheld analyser
- Cloud platform
- Machine learning models
- Multi-sensor synchronisation
- Gateways
- Open API
- Alarm notifications
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Kepware Server
- Feeding a historian from a mixed plant of Allen-Bradley and Siemens PLCs without writing per-protocol driversnot Sensemore
- Publishing CNC machine state from FANUC and Haas controls to an OEE system over MQTTnot Sensemore
- Bridging legacy serial Modbus devices into an OPC UA architecture during a phased controller replacementnot Sensemore
- Running redundant collection servers so a cloud analytics pipeline does not lose data during Windows patchingnot Sensemore
Sensemore
- A cement plant that wants coverage across the whole motor fleet rather than only the critical shortlistnot Kepware Server
- A mid-market manufacturer where the Western vendors quotes exceed the maintenance budget entirelynot Kepware Server
- An integrator packaging condition monitoring into a broader plant automation projectnot Kepware Server
- A water utility instrumenting remote pumping stations where sending a technician to take readings is the main costnot Kepware Server
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Kepware Server
- The base server is the small part of the bill; driver suites are priced by protocol family, and a mixed-vendor plant buys several, which is how a connectivity layer alone reaches tens of thousands of dollars.
- KEPServerEX to Kepware Server 7 is a migration rather than an in-place upgrade, and driver entitlements do not always transfer cleanly, so budget for revalidating every channel.
- The full driver portfolio is Windows-only; the Linux product, Kepware Edge, supports a subset of drivers and is subscription-licensed by tag count, so an edge-first architecture cannot simply reuse the Windows configuration.
- Three names have been in circulation for the same lineage, and quotes, forum answers and integrator experience still mix KEPServerEX, ThingWorx Kepware Server and Kepware Server, which produces mismatched proposals.
- It is a translation layer with no storage, contextualisation or visualisation of its own, so it is always an addition to a historian or platform purchase rather than a substitute for one.
Sensemore
- The company is small and young, so the failure-mode library behind its models is built on a much narrower installed base than SKF or Augury can draw on, and diagnostic specificity reflects that.
- Support and spares are largely delivered through distributors, so response quality varies by country and buyers outside Turkey and the immediate region should verify local coverage before ordering.
- Pricing is not published and routes through integrators, which means the software cost is often bundled into a project price you cannot decompose.
- Long-term vendor viability is an open question for a venture-stage hardware company, and a sensor network is a ten-year commitment; an exit or wind-down would strand the installed hardware.
- Documentation and the analytics user interface are thinner than established competitors, so teams without vibration expertise get less guidance in interpreting what the platform flags.
Pricing, plan by plan
Kepware Server
On request- Kepware Server$undefined/year
- Base server as a perpetual licence with annual maintenance, or subscription
- Driver suites priced by protocol family and bought separately from the server
- Advanced plug-ins such as IoT Gateway, DataLogger and Redundancy Master licensed individually
Sensemore
On request- Sensemore platform$undefined/year
- Hardware purchased per monitoring point
- Cloud platform subscription quoted by sensor count
- Sold largely through distributors and system integrators
Which should you pick?
Choose Kepware Server if
- You need 150-plus device drivers.
- You work on Windows, Linux.
- You also want opc ua server.
Choose Sensemore if
- You need wireless vibration sensors.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want handheld analyser.
Questions people ask
- Is Kepware Server or Sensemore better?
- Neither clearly leads. Kepware Server starts at On request and Sensemore at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Kepware Server or Sensemore?
- Kepware Server starts at On request and Sensemore at On request.
- Does Kepware Server or Sensemore run on more platforms?
- Kepware Server runs on Windows, Linux. Sensemore runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- What is Kepware Server best used for?
- Kepware Server is most often used for feeding a historian from a mixed plant of allen-bradley and siemens plcs without writing per-protocol drivers, publishing cnc machine state from fanuc and haas controls to an oee system over mqtt, bridging legacy serial modbus devices into an opc ua architecture during a phased controller replacement, running redundant collection servers so a cloud analytics pipeline does not lose data during windows patching. Of those, feeding a historian from a mixed plant of allen-bradley and siemens plcs without writing per-protocol drivers and publishing cnc machine state from fanuc and haas controls to an oee system over mqtt are not what Sensemore is typically brought in for.
- What can Kepware Server do that Sensemore cannot?
- Kepware Server covers 150-plus device drivers, OPC UA server, IoT Gateway, DataLogger. Sensemore covers Wireless vibration sensors, Handheld analyser, Cloud platform, Machine learning models.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Kepware Server: Is KEPServerEX discontinued?
The name is. KEPServerEX and ThingWorx Kepware Server have been unified into Kepware Server, currently version 7, and the older names are being retired.
Sensemore: Where is Sensemore based?
Istanbul, Turkey. It designs and manufactures its own sensing hardware.
Kepware Server: Is a perpetual licence still available?
Yes for the Windows server, with annual maintenance. Kepware Edge on Linux is subscription-only.
Sensemore: Is pricing published?
No. Hardware and platform are quoted, usually through a distributor or system integrator.
Kepware Server: What drives the price?
The number and type of driver suites, not the number of tags on the Windows product. Kepware Edge is priced by tag count.
Sensemore: How does it compare on cost?
It is positioned below the established Western condition monitoring vendors, which is the reason most buyers evaluate it.
Kepware Server: Can I evaluate it before buying?
Yes. The runtime works for two hours at a time without a licence, indefinitely, which is enough to prove connectivity but not to run production.
Sensemore: Can I get the raw data out?
Yes, there is a REST API and MQTT support for pulling measurements into other systems.
Related pages
More on Kepware Server
Other head to heads
- Kepware Server vs Ignition
- Kepware Server vs Litmus Edge
- Kepware Server vs Augury
- Kepware Server vs Guidewheel
- Kepware Server vs Waites Sensor Technologies
- Kepware Server vs KCF Technologies
- Kepware Server vs Oden Technologies
- Kepware Server vs ABB 800xA
- Kepware Server vs Aras Innovator
- Kepware Server vs GENESIS Version 11
- Kepware Server vs AVEVA System Platform
- Kepware Server vs Markforged Eiger
- Kepware Server vs Materialise Magics
- Kepware Server vs MOVUS
- Kepware Server vs OpenBOM
- Kepware Server vs Oqton
- Kepware Server vs SKF Enlight Centre
- Kepware Server vs Erbessd Instruments
- Kepware Server vs Nanoprecise Sci Corp
- Kepware Server vs Petasense
- Kepware Server vs Poseidon Systems
- Kepware Server vs Samotics
- Kepware Server vs PROGNOST Systems
- Kepware Server vs eMaint
- Kepware Server vs Prodsmart
- Kepware Server vs Propel
- Kepware Server vs ProShop ERP
- Kepware Server vs Protolabs
- Sensemore vs Ignition
- Sensemore vs Litmus Edge
- Sensemore vs Augury
- Sensemore vs Guidewheel
- Sensemore vs Waites Sensor Technologies
- Sensemore vs KCF Technologies
- Sensemore vs Oden Technologies
- Sensemore vs ABB 800xA
- Sensemore vs Aras Innovator
- Sensemore vs GENESIS Version 11
- Sensemore vs AVEVA System Platform
- Sensemore vs Markforged Eiger
- Sensemore vs Materialise Magics
- Sensemore vs MOVUS
- Sensemore vs OpenBOM
- Sensemore vs Oqton
- Sensemore vs SKF Enlight Centre
- Sensemore vs Erbessd Instruments
- Sensemore vs Nanoprecise Sci Corp
- Sensemore vs Petasense
- Sensemore vs Poseidon Systems
- Sensemore vs Samotics
- Sensemore vs PROGNOST Systems
- Sensemore vs eMaint
- Sensemore vs Prodsmart
- Sensemore vs Propel
- Sensemore vs ProShop ERP
- Sensemore vs Protolabs
