Cybersecurity · head to head
Saviynt vs Teleport

Saviynt
Cybersecurity
Cloud identity governance with privileged access in the same platform
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Teleport
Cybersecurity
Certificate-based access to servers, Kubernetes, databases and apps, replacing shared credentials and VPNs
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Saviynt implementation typically runs a year or more with a partner, and the cost of that work regularly exceeds the first year subscription, which is rarely in the initial business case.; Teleport pricing is not published and is described as active users plus protected resources, so an autoscaling estate cannot forecast the bill and finance teams discover the true cost only after the first true-up.
- They diverge on capability: Saviynt covers Identity governance, Teleport covers Short-lived certificates.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Saviynt and Teleport actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Saviynt
- Identity governance
- Access certification
- Segregation of duties
- Privileged access
- Cloud entitlements
- Third party access
- Access request
Only in Teleport
- Short-lived certificates
- Protocol coverage
- Session recording and replay
- Access Requests
- Device Trust
- Identity provider integration
- Machine identity
- FIPS and FedRAMP builds
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Saviynt
- An enterprise with an audit finding that privileged administrative accounts are excluded from access reviewsnot Teleport
- A healthcare system governing clinician access to Epic alongside corporate applications in one certification campaignnot Teleport
- A company that has to prove segregation of duties in SAP to an external auditor every yearnot Teleport
- A federal contractor needing an identity governance service with FedRAMP authorisationnot Teleport
Teleport
- Removing long-lived SSH keys and shared database passwords so that offboarding an engineer takes one action in the identity providernot Saviynt
- Producing session recordings and per-user database audit trails as direct evidence for SOC 2 or FedRAMPnot Saviynt
- Giving contractors or on-call engineers time-boxed, approved access to production instead of standing admin rightsnot Saviynt
- Replacing a flat VPN with per-resource authorisation across servers, Kubernetes and internal web appsnot Saviynt
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Saviynt
- Implementation typically runs a year or more with a partner, and the cost of that work regularly exceeds the first year subscription, which is rarely in the initial business case.
- Governance quality is limited by HR and application data quality, so organisations with inconsistent joiner records spend the early phases correcting source data rather than certifying access.
- Pricing is per governed identity, so counting contractors, service accounts and non-employee identities materially changes the bill and the definition is worth negotiating explicitly.
- The privileged access module is younger than the governance core and is not a full substitute for a dedicated PAM product in estates with heavy session recording or credential rotation requirements.
- Connectors to less common applications require custom development, and each one adds a maintenance burden that reappears every time the target application changes its API.
Teleport
- Pricing is not published and is described as active users plus protected resources, so an autoscaling estate cannot forecast the bill and finance teams discover the true cost only after the first true-up.
- The proxy is a hard dependency on reaching production, so it needs its own high availability deployment and a tested break-glass path or an outage in Teleport becomes an outage in your ability to respond to outages.
- The open source Community Edition omits Access Requests, Device Trust and the FIPS builds, which are exactly the controls an auditor asks about, so the free tier rarely survives a compliance review.
- Self-hosting means running and upgrading a certificate authority and its backing store, and Teleport releases frequently enough that upgrade work becomes a standing operational commitment.
- Coverage across protocols is uneven in depth, so teams with legacy systems, unusual databases or bespoke network appliances find gaps that still require the old VPN to remain in place alongside it.
Pricing, plan by plan
Saviynt
On request- Saviynt Identity Cloud$undefined/year
- Priced per governed identity per year
- Modules for governance, privileged access and cloud entitlements
- SaaS delivery with FedRAMP authorised offering available
Teleport
On request- Teleport Community Edition$undefined/year
- Open source, self-hosted
- SSH, Kubernetes, database and app access
- Session recording
- Teleport Enterprise$undefined/year
- Cloud-hosted or self-hosted
- Access Requests and approval workflow
- Device Trust and hardware key enforcement
Which should you pick?
Choose Teleport if
- You need short-lived certificates.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Kubernetes, Cloud.
- You also want protocol coverage.
Questions people ask
- Is Saviynt or Teleport better?
- Neither clearly leads. Saviynt starts at On request and Teleport at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Saviynt or Teleport?
- Saviynt starts at On request and Teleport at On request.
- Does Saviynt or Teleport run on more platforms?
- Saviynt runs on Web. Teleport runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Kubernetes, Cloud.
- What is Saviynt best used for?
- Saviynt is most often used for an enterprise with an audit finding that privileged administrative accounts are excluded from access reviews, a healthcare system governing clinician access to epic alongside corporate applications in one certification campaign, a company that has to prove segregation of duties in sap to an external auditor every year, a federal contractor needing an identity governance service with fedramp authorisation. Of those, an enterprise with an audit finding that privileged administrative accounts are excluded from access reviews and a healthcare system governing clinician access to epic alongside corporate applications in one certification campaign are not what Teleport is typically brought in for.
- What can Saviynt do that Teleport cannot?
- Saviynt covers Identity governance, Access certification, Segregation of duties, Privileged access. Teleport covers Short-lived certificates, Protocol coverage, Session recording and replay, Access Requests.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Saviynt: Does Saviynt replace a PAM vendor?
It can for time-bound privileged access, but organisations with heavy session recording, credential rotation or legacy server access requirements often keep a dedicated PAM product alongside it.
Teleport: Is the open source edition usable in production?
Yes, but it lacks Access Requests, Device Trust and FIPS builds, which most compliance programmes end up requiring.
Saviynt: Is there a FedRAMP authorised version?
Yes, Saviynt offers a FedRAMP authorised government cloud offering, which matters where that is an eligibility requirement rather than a preference.
Teleport: How is it priced?
Not publicly. The vendor prices on active users and protected resources and provides a quote after a sales conversation.
Saviynt: How is it priced?
Per governed identity per year, quoted. Define carefully whether service accounts and contractors count toward the identity total.
Teleport: What happens if Teleport goes down?
Nobody reaches the resources behind it, so you need a highly available deployment and a documented break-glass procedure.
Teleport: Does it replace our VPN?
For anything you put behind it, yes. Legacy systems and appliances it does not support will keep the VPN alive.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Saviynt vs One Identity
- Saviynt vs Delinea
- Saviynt vs Omada Identity
- Saviynt vs Infisical
- Saviynt vs Netwrix
- Saviynt vs BeyondTrust
- Saviynt vs Doppler
- Saviynt vs HashiCorp Boundary
- Saviynt vs Speakeasy
- Saviynt vs Chainguard
- Saviynt vs Fenergo
- Saviynt vs Tenable
- Saviynt vs Hanwha Vision
- Saviynt vs Idira
- Saviynt vs IVPN
- Saviynt vs Logto
- Saviynt vs Malwarebytes
- Saviynt vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Saviynt vs JumpCloud
- Saviynt vs HashiCorp Vault
- Saviynt vs Beyond Identity
- Saviynt vs Falco
- Saviynt vs Sysdig
- Saviynt vs Zscaler Internet Access
- Saviynt vs Akeyless
- Saviynt vs DataGrail
- Saviynt vs Envysion
- Saviynt vs Feedzai
- Teleport vs One Identity
- Teleport vs Delinea
- Teleport vs Omada Identity
- Teleport vs Infisical
- Teleport vs Netwrix
- Teleport vs BeyondTrust
- Teleport vs Doppler
- Teleport vs HashiCorp Boundary
- Teleport vs Speakeasy
- Teleport vs Chainguard
- Teleport vs Fenergo
- Teleport vs Tenable
- Teleport vs Hanwha Vision
- Teleport vs Idira
- Teleport vs IVPN
- Teleport vs Logto
- Teleport vs Malwarebytes
- Teleport vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Teleport vs JumpCloud
- Teleport vs HashiCorp Vault
- Teleport vs Beyond Identity
- Teleport vs Falco
- Teleport vs Sysdig
- Teleport vs Zscaler Internet Access
- Teleport vs Akeyless
- Teleport vs DataGrail
- Teleport vs Envysion
- Teleport vs Feedzai
